• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate how effectively governments and our legal system have recognised and responded to the following issues: Aboriginals and the Law including their right to self-determination

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate how effectively governments and our legal system have recognised and responded to the following issues: Aboriginals and the Law including their right to self-determination In the past century, there have been many changes in the law for Aboriginals. The government and the legal systems have responded to these issues in numerous ways. In the early stages of British settlement, the terra nullius doctrine was the government policy in regards to the Aboriginals. The term terra nullius means 'the land of no one.' The British claimed that the Aboriginal people did not have ownership of the land due to the British's belief that their social organisation was primitive and that there was no obvious system of law. Thus, misunderstanding and no knowledge of Aboriginal culture led the government to not effectively recognise the Aboriginal identity and their customary laws. ...read more.

Middle

Assimilation is the process by which a minority group abandons its own culture and adopts the cultural practices of the dominant group in society. Families were split and loss of cultural roots occurred. The British people saw the Aboriginal people as an inferior race who needed to be 'educated' and 'civilised.' These people were referred to as the Stolen Generation and Kevin will be talking about this topic in depth later on. In the 1960s, the assimilation policy was evidently seen as unsuccessful. Global events soon afterwards such as the civil rights movement in America led to Australia's recognition and long awaited support from the general community to improve the social standards of the Aboriginal communities. This led to the policy or reconciliation and self-determination beginning from the 1970s. According to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) ...read more.

Conclusion

However, this new accepting change in government policy was not very effective. Not much action was taken place and the federal parliament did not use their new law-making process for nearly 10 years. In 1968, the council of Aboriginal affairs was established towards funding for the improvement of education, housing and health of the Aboriginal people. In 1989, the establishment of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Commission dealed with issues specifically concerning them. ATSIC was abolished in 2004. In 1998, it was voted in Canberra that any new changes to the Commonwealth Constitution should acknowledge the 'original occupancy and custodianship of Australia by Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders.' Circle sentencing is part of the self-determination policy which is a method that allows elders and community leaders to determine an appropriate sentence will punish and educate the offender, and appease the victim. In general, despite legislation and changes, many Aboriginal communities continue to be disadvantaged and prejudiced in the Australian community. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    286. Nawrot (1988) 10 Cr App R (S) 239 stated that a public official is also vulnerable. In this case, the offender was sentenced to two years for assaulting a police officer, although this sentence was necessary as a deterrence as well as vulnerability. A breach of trust is also taken into consideration.

  2. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    Once appointed the Justices are independent of any direct force from the other two branches of government. How can the Senate predict what decision a justice may take 30 years hence? To highlight this point we only have to look at how vocal Presidents have been their regret over appointments.

  1. Ideas and issues in "the visit" and "a chronicle of a death foretold".

    In other words, they seek someone to stop them by telling the whole town of their intentions. "...,in reality it seemed that the Vicario brothers had done nothing right with a view to killing Santiago Nasar immediately and without any public spectacle, but had done much more than could be

  2. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    o Can be given to 12 - 31 yr old. But only for persistent if under 15. o Power for home secretary to extend to aged 10&11 if court says necessary to protect public. Detention for Serious Crimes o For Serious Offences, court can order longer periods of detention.

  1. "The Chamberlain Case highlighted many of the weaknesses in the Australian legal system

    Afterwards the jumpsuit was laid out on the ground to get a clear shot of the markings. This was the picture that was released to the press. This led people to believe that this was how the clothes were found.4 This should have never occurred because it caused the public

  2. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    justice, even if lawyers were choosing the high-value winnable cases and leaving many low-value cases without remedy. b) To what extent have the recent reforms in legal aid been motivated by financial concerns rather than a desire to ensure access to justice for all?

  1. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    The Court of Appeal considered judicial intervention in plea arrangements in the greatly controversial case of R v Turner.7 In this case the defendant had changed his plea to guilty on reliance that counsel was conveying the stance of the judge when he said that a guilty plea was likely to result in a non-custodial sentence.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    One positive aspect of this is that it would be impossible for the ability of an expert to be questioned as they will have already shown that they have the required knowledge and expertise to testify in a court of law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work