• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of communication

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐THE DIGITAL AGE? WILL IT AFFECT YOUR CONTRACTS? The law of contract is imperative for the function of commercial activity as it seeks to protect businesses and individuals engaging in transactions. The formation of contract; the beginning stage of when a contract is being formed is governed by strict rules and terms to distinguish the different elements. The statutes regarding offers and invitations to treat are dominated by the 18-20th century where communication was distant and took a considerable amount of time. However, with the turn of the millennium; we have entered a ?digital age? where the use of technology is widespread and interactivity is encouraged which has affected the way we communicate. Thus the purpose of this article is to evaluate whether or not the law regarding the formation of contract must be reformed to accommodate modern methods of communication. The previous commonly used methods of communication were letters which does have problems in the formation of contract. This is because a contract can be terminated if; a reasonable time has passed or if there is a specified time and it has passed. In modern times, the major shift in communication is the fact that it has become instantaneous. For example, a telephone conversation has the same speed as a face to face conversation. Other modern types of communication include text messaging, social networking such as Facebook and Twitter or even Skype and email. ...read more.

Middle

It is the purchaser who makes the offer based on the invitation to treat provided on the website. However, to protect the consumer, the contract is voidable if the basic information described is not given in the invitation to treat. An incident in 1999 indicated the application of the common law rules of offer and acceptance to an advertisement on a website. A large electronic retailer mistakenly advertised televisions for £30 when the actual price was £300. Many customers contacted the retailer ‘accepting the offer’ but it was concluded that the advertisement was an invitation to treat, the purchasers were making the offer and the retailer was entitled to reject those offers. Moreover, the Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations 2000 state that if a commercial supplier is supplying goods or services to a consumer and the contract is made, for example by exchange of letters, faxes, emails, by teleshopping or by website trading then the consumer is entitled to a cooling off period in which the contract may be ended by the consumer. The consumer has the right to cancel the contract within seven working days of the consumer’s receipt of the goods. The Regulations do not alter the common law rules of offer and acceptance but do allow the consumer some protection when having made a valid contract then having second thoughts. When questioning whether the law on the formation of contract has to be reformed due to advancements in modern communication. ...read more.

Conclusion

Under the current law, the parties terminate offers by making counter offers so there is only one offer in existence from one party at any one time. If all offers stayed open for acceptance despite counter offers then a party could accept an offer that was made at the commencement of negotiations which may be minutes, hours or days before. An accurate record of all offers would be required to ensure there was no misunderstanding over what was being accepted. This would be an impractical way to run commercial life in the UK so the current law appears to be the only alternative. The postal rule has always ensued dispute as to its fairness. The rule appears to be unfair on an offeror who may never receive the letter of acceptance or it is late. The offeror is a party to a legally binding contract without realising. The offeror may have contracted with another party in the meantime so the courts have to deal with three innocent parties and can make a decision that will only be satisfactory to two parties or perhaps even one party. The postal rule is infact justified for the two reasons set out above. Moreover, the offeror is regarded as having the most power and ability to protect him/herself in this situation. If the offeror states the acceptance must, for example be received or must be by face-to-face communication then the postal rule can never apply. Therefore, the rule appears to be a fair compromise as far as it relates to the post. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    which came in later was not supported by a fresh consideration and yet it was argued that the previous request and the subsequent promise was deemed to be one transaction, and thus being a valid consideration after all. Another similar case which follows this line of thought would be Re:

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    auctioneer liable to the highest bidder in other separate contract Payne v Cave Sale by auction is only complete when the auctioneer announces its completion by the fall of the hammer. * Mere advertisement of an auction to be held is not an offer Harris v Nickerson The plaintiff is

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    s 1(3) Where any party to the contract has, by reason of anything done by any other party thereto in, or for the purpose of , the performance of the contract, obtained a valuable benefit (other than the payment of money)

  2. Contract Law

    Requirements of Acceptance Acceptance of an offer is the expression, by words or conduct, of assent to the terms of the offer in the manner prescribed or indicated by the offer. Thus acceptance may be expressed or implied (HBF Dalgety v Morton [1987]).

  1. Void and voidable Contracts.

    Karen has clearly asked the manager, who is an informed person, for the dimensions of the sofa. He has innocently misinformed her, thus inducing her to enter the contract. Therefore the contract is voidable and gives Karen the right to withdraw from the contract if she so wishes.

  2. Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the ...

    In respect of Sarah's claim for the bike ride prize, an acceptance which is wholly motivated by factors other than the existence of the offer has no effect. 17 As the act of riding to Oxford was performed in ignorance of the offer, as she was going to Oxford anyway, she cannot make a claim.

  1. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    2 Express terms, collective agreements, working rules, and statute. 3 Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1986] AC 80 4 Reigate v. Union Manufacturing Co [1918] 1 KB 592 5 G.H. Treitel, The Law of Contract 9th edition, Sweet & Maxwell (1995) 6 Luxor (Eastbourne)

  2. Invitation To Treat

    in the fact that only the former can be accepted so as to form a contract. Acceptance must be the communicated by the offeree to the offeror. Silence cannot amount to acceptance, neither can not doing anything - a positive act is required.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work