• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Everyone has the right to respect for their family life." Discuss this statement in light of s.8 of the ECHR and the case of EM (Lebanon (FC) (Appellants) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Extracts from this document...


"Everyone has the right to respect for their family life." Discuss this statement in light of s.8 of the ECHR and the case of EM (Lebanon (FC) (Appellants) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Introduction The European Convention on Human Rights was put in place to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe. The convention also established the European Court of Human Rights, if any person feels their rights have been violated under this convention then they may take the case to this court. The purpose of section eight of the ECHR is "to provide a right to one's family life, his home and his correspondence. This relates to the EM case study because EM felt her right to a family life would be violated if she was forced to return to Lebanon, as her family life would be torn apart as she would lose custody of her son, AF. ...read more.


For reasons such as this would interference by the state be completely justified. You are entitled to this right if you are an asylum seeker or immigrant, like for example in the case of EM. In the case of EM if she was to be returned to Lebanon she would then lose the right to a family life. She was not claiming that the United Kingdom were not allowing this right, however she was claiming that if she were to be removed from the country, then this would lead to her losing this right as she would lose the custody of her son. EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department In the case of EM vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department EM was an immigrant from Lebanon who emigrated to the UK in 2004 because once her son reached a certain age she would lose custody of him in Lebanon, this was due to the Muslim laws in place in the country at the time. ...read more.


Conclusion To sum up my essay I would say that I agree with the decision of the House of Lords because as said in court, the evidence is compelling that sending the mother and son back to Lebanon would completely tear apart the essence of their family life as the mother would be charged with kidnap and due to Lebanese law the child would be handed over to the father, and still if the father were found to be unfit as the parent, the son would be passed to the paternal grandfather or a member of the fathers family, not however the mother. I can see the reasons for the case against her because in a way once she would be back in Lebanon she would no longer have that right since Lebanon is not a member of the convention however essentially it would be down to the United Kingdom for not respecting EM's right to a family life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    The buyers issued a writ claiming damages for breach of the contract. The House of Lords held that the service of the writ should be set aside because the contract had not been made within the court's jurisdiction. Lord Wilberforce stated that the present case is, as Entores itself, the

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    This is referred to as the contra proferentum rule. Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance [1954] 1 QB 247. A motor insurance policy said the insurers would not be liable for any damage caused "whilst the car is carrying any load in excess of that for which it was constructed".

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    � Bills of exchange and cheques � Consumer credit contracts which relates to credit cards and hire purchase. Contracts which must be evidenced in writing Certain contracts may be made orally but in the court of law they are not enforceable as there is no proof to what either party will justify.

  2. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    Camilla seems to have made an improper threat to break the contract and Ildar may have found it impossible to find someone else to supply the plants at such short notice (three days). And of course it would have been a big blow for Ildar to loose a customer such

  1. health and safety legislation and regulation

    * Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992: require employers to provide appropriate protective clothing and equipment for their employees. * Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998: require that equipment provided for use at work, including machinery, is safe.

  2. Contract law - Case study.

    To prove this, Christabel has to prove that it was a fully oral contract which was formed right after the negotiations where the four essential elements of a contract already exist. Following that, Christabel has to argue that the document did not appear to be contractual.

  1. Case Analysis: Christine Brooks v. Cooke County Hospital District

    The employer cannot end the relationship by discriminating the employee on the basis of sex, color, national origin, race and religion. o Public policy: An employer may not terminate an employee for any reason that violates a state's public policy.

  2. In your own words summarise the views of Fenton Atkinson and Salmon L and ...

    Salmon then stresses the daughter's reliance in giving up her job and moving to England and considered that the original agreement made was intended by both parties to have contractual force. Both parties had intentions to have the legal right to respectively receive and pay the allowance of $200 a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work