• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

"Examine why sexual offenders attract so much attention these days. How has the Criminal Justice System responded to societies anxieties?"

Extracts from this document...


Victims, Public Protection and Risk "Examine why sexual offenders attract so much attention these days. How has the Criminal Justice System responded to societies anxieties?" In preparing for this essay it has been identified that sexual offenders are not a homogenous group of individuals and that this is an umbrella term used to describe a range of behaviours ranging from acts of voyeurism and exhibitionism, to more serious acts of pedophilia and rape. For the purpose of this essay I have chosen to focus on the more serious forms of sex offending which in my opinion, are the cause of much of the current attention. In order to understand why sexual offenders attract so much attention I will begin by considering today's society and the emergence of post-modernist values and the preoccupation with risk. I shall then go on to consider the factors which have influenced this current climate. These include the media and its portrayal of high-profile cases like that of Sarah Payne and Sidney Cooke, actions taken in the USA to manage dangerous offenders and the introduction of new offences of 'grooming' spurred by the growth of the internet. Following this I shall concentrate on how the Criminal Justice System has responded to society's anxieties and public protection needs. I will consider the range of strategies implemented to manage and reduce risk, including new legislative provisions, the creation of a Sex Offender Register, development of risk assessment tools, Multi-Agency working and accredited programmes. Finally I will consider the effectiveness of such interventions and whether the current preoccupation with public protection and management of offenders has been introduced at the expense of this category of offenders, who are now at risk of over inclusiveness and erosion of their human rights. Social Theorists have noted a shift from what was once a 'modernist' society to one with post-modernist values (Beck 1986, Giddens 1990 & Garland 1985). ...read more.


Recently, the Criminal Justice Act (2003) has introduced Extended sentences for Public Protection (EPP) and Indeterminate sentences for Public Protection (IPP) to further restrict liberty in the interest of public protection. Decisions on who may be sentenced to such will be dependent upon the level of risk they pose, and whether or not they can be managed in the community. The Criminal Justice Act (2003) also introduced 'grooming' as a criminal offence, following heightened awareness of the dangers of this. The aim is to proactively monitor those who make contact with children online in order to engage in sexual activity offline and to intervene to protect the child before any physical or sexual harm is caused. The Sexual Offences Act (2003) also modernises the law on sexual offences and introduces new offences designed to protect complainants of either gender who suffer from mental disorder. Multi-Agency Public Protection Panel Panels (MAPPPs) have been introduced under the Criminal Justice Court Services Act (2000) to create a seamless approach to the management of sexual offenders (Home Office 2001a). Police, probation and prison officers (following implementation of the Criminal Justice Act 2003), have a statutory duty to implement inter-agency arrangements for the assessment and management of 'the risks posed by sexual and violent offenders' (Home Office 2001a). The government now allows representatives of local communities to sit in on MAPPPs meetings so that a local community view on risk management can be expressed. Furthermore MAPPPs are required to produce and publish annual reports of their activities both of which demonstrate a marked attempt to ensure greater accountability (Kemshall 2003, p90). To reduce the likelihood of sex offender recidivism a number of Interventions have been introduced under the Sexual Offences Act (2003). These include; Sex Offender Treatment Programmes (SOTP) run in prisons which aim to assess and treat all sexual offenders serving a sentence of four or more years (Craissati, 1998). ...read more.


Also, risk levels are not static, therefore offenders must be subjected to regular risk reviews in order to proactively identify any changes in the level of risk they pose. In order to conclude, it has been identified that we are currently living in a post-modernist society obsessed by risks which threaten our existence. These risks have been further exacerbated by globalisation and the onslaught of saturated and distorted messages of risk. Also by the creation of moral panics spurred via our sensationalist media portraying sexual offenders as 'mad, sad or bad' and a dangerous risk to society which has elevated them into the position of 'folk devil'. This has led to the creation of a wealth of legislative provisions, including the introduction of a Sex Offender Register, extended sentences, multi-agency working and the formation of new sexual offences. Interventions have also been designed in an attempt to reduce the risk of re-offending, including accredited programmes, restriction orders and increased use of electronic monitoring. However, in adopting these new ways of working we have had to swallow a number of principles including innocent until proven guilty, proportionate sentencing, avoidance of double jeopardy and balance of individual and community rights, including right to know and offenders right to privacy. Primary support appears to be in the willingness of successive governments to endorse a populist, tabloid driven agenda in order to promote itself as an effective organisation. Whilst this may appease the public, such attempts to curb sexual offences by incarceration and placing restrictions on liberty may not be as effective as perceived. In my opinion, greater provisions for management in the community may prove to be more effective and could aid the successful re-integration of this category of offenders. However, this will not be achievable until the media finds another group of individuals on which it can focus its attention, or until we have a better understanding of sexual offenders making us less fearful and more tolerating of such offenders. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Non-fatal Offences?

    3 star(s)

    These words are not for the 21st century and can cause confusion, therefore resulting in an injustice verdict. Accompanying, this even lawyers and judges say assault when they actually mean battery. Thus one could argue that the current law on non fatal offences is not satisfactory.

  2. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    In Fraser (1982) 2 Cr App R (S) 449 the Court of Appeal decided to bring into force a two stage approach to sentencing. They decided that a sentencer must look at how grave or serious an offence is,

  1. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    States, research revealed that bargains were far superior for white defendants than they were for black defendants. By introducing a formal system it will not solve equal bargains as ethnic minority defendants are more likely to exercise their right to trial.18 It is well known that in criminal proceedings if

  2. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    It would therefore seem as though Cone's black theology certainly had a Rawlsian understanding of justice. Rawls also goes further to talk about a maximin rule of game theory where one must choose the distribution pattern that favours the least well off.

  1. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    Only those with disposable incomes below the limit laid down for the type of legal aid required, were eligible for help.

  2. Explain and comment on the main reforms made to the civil justice system after ...

    If the defendant is intending to defend the claim then they must submit the grounds of defence to the courts within 14 days. The court will then serve both you and the defendant with an N150 form, which is known as the 'Allocation Questionnaire' and contains particulars of the claim.

  1. Why do young people join gangs and other subcultures? How does a criminal sub ...

    Families (2006) Why do young people join gangs and other sub cultures? Hackerman pointed out four overarching reasons why young people join gangs: American Counselling Association (2002) Family issues These issues can range from the absence of a male role model to inadequate supervision or an unhealthy level of permissiveness in the home.

  2. Evaluate how effectively governments and our legal system have recognised and responded to the ...

    Legislation was placed within all the states (except Tasmania) for the protection of the Aboriginals. The main features of this legislation were the segregation of the non-indigenous society, the establishment of the reserves to facilitate this and the state control.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work