• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain and comment on the main reforms made to the civil justice system after the Woolf Report.

Extracts from this document...


Assignment for English Legal System a) Explain and comment on the main reforms made to the civil justice system after the Woolf Report. It is essential to reform the legal system in order to maintain the contemporary and evolving society - without which the system cannot survive. Legislation made in the early nineteenth century was found to be unfit due to the rapid progressing society, however, the fact that laws appear out of date does not necessarily mean that they will technically cease to apply; such legislation still stands valid until it is repealed. During the power of the Conservative Government, Lord Woolf was appointed to carry out an extensive review of the civil justice system, which was created to resolve disputes between companies or individuals who felt that their rights had been affected. In July 1996, after two years of intensive research, the Access to Justice: Final Report was published by Lord Woolf in which he stated that the civil justice system should: (a) be just in the results it delivers; (b) be fair in the way it treats litigants; (c) offer appropriate procedures at a reasonable cost; (d) ...read more.


They felt that they were not able to litigate cases cost effectively, as the reform had intended, due to the lack of assistance within the administration of the courts, such as not being able to obtain urgent orders or contact them over the telephone. Overall, the developments made to the civil justice system subsequent to the Woolf report have proven to be predominantly effective. Quickfix Ltd has separate contracts with two companies, Roughs Ltd and Stokes Ltd, to purchase goods. Roughs have failed to deliver some of the goods and it has cost Quickfix �10,000 extra to replace these items and they wish to claim the �10,000 from Roughs. Stokes has delivered faulty goods and Quickfix wish to claim �80,000 from them. (b) Advise Quickfix on the type of court and procedure likely to be used for each of their claims In light of the facts, I would fiirst of all advise you to attempt to resolve matters by communicating with both companies. If this proves unsuccessful then correspond with both companies notifying them of your intention to take matters to court unless they respond within 7 days. On assumption that both companies have not responded to your notification, you may then proceed with the matter to court. ...read more.


After this stage, a pre-trial review will be held. The purpose of this is to determine a timetable for trial, arrange who will give evidence and in what order, the content of the bundle and a deadline for it to reach the court and finally the time allowed for trial. The fast track cases are usually dealt within one day lasting a maximum of 5 hours. After the trial has ended the court will send both you and the defendant with an order (judgement). This will have a detailed decision made by the judge together with any order of costs. If the judgement orders Roughs Ltd to pay the full amount of �10,000 plus costs but they refuse to pay then you must ensure that you enforce your judgement by notfiying the courts, as they will not take action unless told to. However, there will be a fee payable to court for this enforcement. In respect of the second claim the procedure will more or less be the same, however, as this claim is more than �50,000, it will be dealt by the High Court through the multi-track process. The High Court may decide to refer the matter to the County Court as it is relatively straight forward and holds no issues of public concern and it will be dealt with more quickly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is the name given to the process where parties in ...

    5 star(s)

    It would appear that the adversarial system goes against achieving the objectives of the civil justice system which was to provide for processes that were just, accessible, efficient, timely and effective. The motivation for having such a platform is clear enough : to encourage people to conduct their daily affairs

  2. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    This ensures that the quality and planning of advice given is of a better standard. Before this act there had been in some places no access to advice or any overall planning. It also ensures that between voluntary and private sectors there is a partnership to make sure that all are equally able to obtain Community Legal Service contracts.

  1. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    The fact of the matter is that Justice Roberts, whether intentionally or not, is being na�ve about the role that the court really performs. Dworkin has already shown us how the constitution is not interpreted per se but rather the moral principles embodied in it are re-examined.

  2. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    The Court of Appeal considered judicial intervention in plea arrangements in the greatly controversial case of R v Turner.7 In this case the defendant had changed his plea to guilty on reliance that counsel was conveying the stance of the judge when he said that a guilty plea was likely to result in a non-custodial sentence.

  1. Describe how civil disputes can be resolved without going to court (this does not ...

    What tends to happen is that parties feel they have finally had a chance to "tell their story"." Also, the parties and their lawyers are aware that an experienced and independent neutral, having heard all aspects of the case, has arrived at a conclusion that likely will be mirrored by a trial judge or a jury.

  2. Woolf Reforms

    The sheer length of proceedings also greatly affected the cost at the end. The court system was also found to be too complex; people needed a lawyer, increasing costs even further. Once the Civil Procedure Rules came into force each issue from Lord Woolf's report was addressed.

  1. Court proceedings.

    There is a danger that the jury has become a scapegoat for other failings in the prosecution of serious frauds. Other arguments are extremely difficult to assess, particularly in relation to whether or not juries are likely to be swayed by eloquent arguments and produce 'perverse' verdicts.

  2. Access to Civil Justice in This Age of Austerity

    But the Law Society and Bar Council have expressed that the government?s funding cuts could prevent the legal profession to continue providing pro bono assistance On the other hand, with regards to litigants in person Judges have and are already well used to dealing with litigants in person.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work