• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain and Comment on the role of the Criminal Cases Review Commission.

Extracts from this document...


Explain and Comment on the role of the Criminal Cases Review Commission [20] June 2001 On 14 March 1991 the then Home Secretary announced the establishment of a Royal Commission on Criminal Justice to be chaired by Viscount Runciman of Doxford. The Royal Commission was charged with examining the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in securing the conviction of the guilty and the acquittal of the innocent. In making the announcement, the Home Secretary referred to such cases as the Birmingham Six and Judith Ward which had raised serious issues of concern to all, and the undermining of public confidence when the arrangements for criminal justice failed. It was felt that the Home Secretary was not sufficiently independent from the Government in order to review cases fairly. The Royal Commission's report was presented to Parliament in July 1993. ...read more.


The Criminal Cases Review Commission took over the investigation of miscarriages of justice in April 1997. Some of the first cases it investigated were alleged miscarriages of justice from over 40 years ago, such as the case of Derek Bentley. Bentley was hanged for murder in 1953, while his co-defendant, Craig, who actually fired the fatal shot, was not hanged due to his youth. Over the years there have been many attempts to have the case re-opened but it was not until the Criminal Cases Review Commission took over the investigation that the case was referred back to the Court of Appeal. In July 1998 the Court of Appeal held that the summing-up of the judge at the trial had not been fair and it quashed the conviction. Whenever the Commission considers that there is a real possibility that a conviction or sentence would not be upheld, it will refer the case. ...read more.


In the first four and a half years of work the Criminal Cases Review Commission received almost 4,500 applications and had dealt with about 3,500 of these. The Commission had referred 145 cases to the Court of Appeal. 73 of these had been heard and the convictions quashed in 55 cases. It is important that claims that there has been a miscarriage of justice should be dealt with as quickly as possible so that any injustice can be put right and so that, where the claim is rejected, everyone concerned can know where they stand and get on with their lives. "I believe that the Criminal Cases Review Commission will come to play a key role in enhancing public confidence in the integrity and effectiveness of the criminal justice system as a whole, as Parliament intended, and I look forward to seeing it do so." -Jack Straw, Home Secretary, 2001 Pg. 1 04/12/03 Nasima Begum 12A ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

A good, comprehensive essay, summarising the role of the CCRC.

The essay is a little dated now, however. The Commission has been criticized for the length of time it takes to examine cases, and the way it produces statistics.

Further, the Innocence Network has recently issued a report on the effectiveness of the commission which might bear briefly mentioning: http://www.innocencenetwork.org.uk/ccrcreport

4 Stars

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 09/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is the name given to the process where parties in ...

    5 star(s)

    This may deter litigants from doing all they can at the pre-action stage and may simply comply with the requirements of the Pre-Action Protocol by indulging in formalities only. To tackle the root of the problem we would have to look into alternative ways to settle disputes rather than depending solely on adversarial trials.

  2. International Institutions and Human Rights. The three international institutions and their impact on ...

    Women, children, and families are also addressed in several articles, because these groups face specific issues. In addition, Article 29 indicates that humans and governments have responsibilities to each other, to ensure that human rights are preserved and protected. (http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-universal-declaration-of-human-rights.htm)

  1. Free essay

    Critically discuss whether the criminal courts of England and Wales require substantial reform. Firstly ...

    In other words if there is a doubt in the minds of any of the Magistrates or Jury in the crown court the defendant must be found not guilty. However, they can only be punished if they are found guilty and once this has happened then he/she is a criminal.

  2. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    a set of basic rights and principles which are best for all members of society, since nobody will be willing to disadvantage a section of society if they might find themselves a member of it. Law, on the other hand, is difficult to define.

  1. Free essay

    Law and Justice

    This means that as there is no knowledge of people's gender, religion, age or social class, no pre-conceptions will exist. Rawls believes that this ignorance is the only way to reach fair decisions and for justice to be served. Michael Allen also suggests this, as in 'Criminal Law' he states

  2. Demonstrate your understanding of both the UK civil and criminal court systems and their ...

    This is why the burden of proof is different. In civil court the plaintiff is required to prove his case "on the balance of probabilities". This means that the judge or jury believes that it is more likely than not that you were wronged.

  1. Describe the routes of appeal for the defence from both the Magistrates Court and ...

    would not be upheld (s13 Criminal Appeal Act 1995). The cases described below was been heard by the Court of Appeal following referral by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, on the grounds that there is a real possibility that the conviction, finding, verdict or sentence may not be upheld.

  2. 'Juries are anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard.' To what extent do you think that this ...

    A jury is used very rarely in civil cases and hears cases involving fraud, defamation of character or malicious prosecution. When a case is heard in the High Court requires twelve as discussed earlier.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work