• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how judges construe legislations and describe how they use the rules of construction.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Explain how judges construe legislations and describe how they use the rules of construction. Question 2 Explain the statement that "not all agreements are contracts". Composition of a contract A contract is founded on agreement which arises from offer and acceptance. When one person makes an offer and another person accepts that offer, there is a contract. If no or not a properly acceptance exits, there is no contract. Consequently, not all agreements are contracts. General Rule -- Communication of the acceptance The general rule is that an acceptance must be communicated to the offeror. The acceptance is generally only validly communicated when it is actually brought to the attention of the offeror. The operation of this rule was illustrated by Denning LJ v. Miles Far East Corp. In the case, he said that if an oral acceptance is drowned out by an overflying aircraft, such that the offeror cannot hear the acceptance, then there is no contract unless the acceptor repeats his acceptance once the aircraft has passed over. ...read more.

Middle

At the same time Y has performed a socially useful act in returning the dog and he should be rewarded for so doing. On the other hand, in the case of bilateral contract which imposes mutual obligations upon the parties, the effect of such a rule would be to subject the accepting party to obligations of which he was unaware. However, the rule which has been adopted in England is that a person who, in ignorance of the offer, performs the act or acts requested by the offeror is not entitled to sue as on a contract. An offer cannot be accepted by someone who is ignorant of the existence of the offer or by someone who does not have the offer in his mind when he does the act which he alleges constitutes the acceptance. 2. Acceptance by Silence The general rule is that acceptance of an offer will not implied from mere silence on the part of the offeree and that an offeror cannot impose a contractual obligation upon the offeree by stating that, unless the latter expressly rejects the offer, he will be held to have accepted it. ...read more.

Conclusion

3. Uncertainty of an agreement In order to constitute a valid contract, the parties must express their agreement in a form which is sufficiently certain. There are two types of uncertain agreement: Vagueness and Incompleteness. --Vagueness In the case of Scammell and Nephew Ltd v. Ouston, where the parties entered into an agreement to buy goods on 'hire purchase'. It was held that this agreement was too vague to be enforced because there were many different types of hire purchase agreements in use, these agreement varied widely in their content and it was not clear what type of hire purchase agreement was envisaged. As a result, the courts are reluctant to find that an agreement is so vague that it cannot be enforced. --Incompleteness The agreement may be incomplete because the parties have failed to reach agreement upon a particular tissue. Conclusion The above situations are no contract. The valid contract has a properly communication of offeror and offeree. In order to have a valid agreement, the offer and acceptance should exist clearly. Otherwise the contract cannot be enforced by court. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    In the past, when it had seemed inequitable for the courts to strictly demand consideration in some cases, the judges will go to much lengths to search and sometimes even create consideration, they exercise some degree of discreet and have not gone as far as to outrightly claim that even

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    It was held that the plaintiff's first telegram was not a counter-offer but only an enquiry, so a binding contract was made by the plaintiff's second telegram. C. Revocation * The offer may be revoked by the offeror any time before it is accepted.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In this Assignment I am going to describe the requirements of a valid contract ...

    3 star(s)

    It is very essential that: * Goods sold whether new or second hand must be as described- e.g. If clothes are said to be 100% made with cotton then it should be 100% cotton. * Goods sold must of satisfactory quality- must be of the quality and standard in which it is said to be.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    If the claimant can purchase replacement goods or performance, specific performance will not be offered. Cohen v Roche [1927] 1 KB 169. An auctioneer failed to deliver a set of Hepplewhite chairs sold to the buyer. The buyer was successful in claiming that there was a breach of contract, but the court refused to order specific performance.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    Therefore there was no binding contract. While acceptance must be communicated by the offeree, revocation of offer may be communicated by any third party who is adequately reliable informant. If the offer was made to the entire world, such as Carlill's case, the revocation must take form that is similar to the offer.

  2. Contract Practice for Alpha construction LTD.

    1. Minutes of Meetings 2. Summary of Decisions 3. Agreed Decisions 4. Research Notes ________________ THEME 1 mEETING aGENDA and mINUTES ________________ Meeting Agenda 1.1 Project: Hertfordshire School of Construction Ltd Date: 17 February 2004 Time: 13:00 Location: Marylebone Campus, Library Present : Taha Sheikh-Noor (TSN), Courtney Bramwell (CB), Shazad Mahmood (SM)

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    It was held that the man had accepted the terms of the offer in the advertisement and was entitled to the coat. Sheena accepted the terms of the offer for the mini disc player and therefore she is entitled to buying the mini disc player for � 10.

  2. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    Bannerman v White (1861) 10 CBNS 844. A buyer negotiating for the sale of some hops asked if they had been treated with sulphur, saying that if they had he would not even bother asking the price. The seller stated that sulphur had not been used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work