• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how judges construe legislations and describe how they use the rules of construction.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Explain how judges construe legislations and describe how they use the rules of construction. Question 2 Explain the statement that "not all agreements are contracts". Composition of a contract A contract is founded on agreement which arises from offer and acceptance. When one person makes an offer and another person accepts that offer, there is a contract. If no or not a properly acceptance exits, there is no contract. Consequently, not all agreements are contracts. General Rule -- Communication of the acceptance The general rule is that an acceptance must be communicated to the offeror. The acceptance is generally only validly communicated when it is actually brought to the attention of the offeror. The operation of this rule was illustrated by Denning LJ v. Miles Far East Corp. In the case, he said that if an oral acceptance is drowned out by an overflying aircraft, such that the offeror cannot hear the acceptance, then there is no contract unless the acceptor repeats his acceptance once the aircraft has passed over. ...read more.

Middle

At the same time Y has performed a socially useful act in returning the dog and he should be rewarded for so doing. On the other hand, in the case of bilateral contract which imposes mutual obligations upon the parties, the effect of such a rule would be to subject the accepting party to obligations of which he was unaware. However, the rule which has been adopted in England is that a person who, in ignorance of the offer, performs the act or acts requested by the offeror is not entitled to sue as on a contract. An offer cannot be accepted by someone who is ignorant of the existence of the offer or by someone who does not have the offer in his mind when he does the act which he alleges constitutes the acceptance. 2. Acceptance by Silence The general rule is that acceptance of an offer will not implied from mere silence on the part of the offeree and that an offeror cannot impose a contractual obligation upon the offeree by stating that, unless the latter expressly rejects the offer, he will be held to have accepted it. ...read more.

Conclusion

3. Uncertainty of an agreement In order to constitute a valid contract, the parties must express their agreement in a form which is sufficiently certain. There are two types of uncertain agreement: Vagueness and Incompleteness. --Vagueness In the case of Scammell and Nephew Ltd v. Ouston, where the parties entered into an agreement to buy goods on 'hire purchase'. It was held that this agreement was too vague to be enforced because there were many different types of hire purchase agreements in use, these agreement varied widely in their content and it was not clear what type of hire purchase agreement was envisaged. As a result, the courts are reluctant to find that an agreement is so vague that it cannot be enforced. --Incompleteness The agreement may be incomplete because the parties have failed to reach agreement upon a particular tissue. Conclusion The above situations are no contract. The valid contract has a properly communication of offeror and offeree. In order to have a valid agreement, the offer and acceptance should exist clearly. Otherwise the contract cannot be enforced by court. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    cause of action as well as in the case of Pascoe v Turner [1987]. It should be noted that the case of Jordan v Money [1854] established that the representation must be of a fact. The common law estoppels operate upon representation or promises of existing fact while equitable estoppels

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    W refused to sell and H sued for breach of contract. Lord Langdale MR held that if the defendant's offer to sell for �1,000 had been unconditionally accepted, there would have been a binding contract; instead the plaintiff made an offer of his own of �950, and thereby rejected the offer previously made by the defendant.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In this Assignment I am going to describe the requirements of a valid contract ...

    3 star(s)

    - then the bulk order has to be of the same quality as the sample. A seller who does not comply with these terms will be in breach of the implied terms and the purchaser, consumer will have rights. Supply of Goods and Service Act 1982 This is another example of legislation that creates implied term with potential customers.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    If the claimant can purchase replacement goods or performance, specific performance will not be offered. Cohen v Roche [1927] 1 KB 169. An auctioneer failed to deliver a set of Hepplewhite chairs sold to the buyer. The buyer was successful in claiming that there was a breach of contract, but the court refused to order specific performance.

  1. Legal advice for Equipment Hire Limited.

    contract as Sunil may not have told EHL that he was hiring the ladder for personal use. Nevertheless EHL would still have to pay compensation for Sunil's broken leg as they were negligent in hiring the defective ladder under section 2.1 of UCTA 1977 which also applies to business customers.

  2. Offer and Acceptance

    or a request, which isn't actually killing the offer, due to it sometimes is difficult to tell whether a counter-offer has taken place, sometimes it is merely a request for information, shown in the case of Stevenson v McLean (1880)

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    Offeror and offeree An offeror is the negotiating because he controls the terms and conditions of the offer i.e. he controls the price and how long the offer stands. An offeree is the person who is prepared to accept the offer.

  2. Assess the problems that arise through terminating and offer

    The builders were under the instruction from the architects and they were told to issue an order for the shop fitters, they did this under their standard form which mentioned that the shop fitters would not get paid until the builders had themselves been paid.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work