• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown court trial

Extracts from this document...


A, Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown court trial The right to trial by jury can be traced back to Magna Carta (The Great Charter of Liberties, 1215) and the independence of the jury from the judge was established in Bushell's Case (1670). In criminal cases, the jury make the decision whether the defendant is guilty or not guilt. However, this is approximately only 3% of all crimes, and these are heard in the Crown Court. In civil cases, the jury decide if the claimant has proved their case and the amount of damages (compensation). Nevertheless, it is a right in only four types of civil case, which are: defamation over �10,000, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and fraud. In other civil cases it is discretionary. To be on a jury you need to qualify. To qualify for jury service a person must be aged between 18 and 70, registered on the electoral roll, and they must have lived in the UK for at least five years since the age of 13. ...read more.


The method of selection has changed in the last few years. The old method involved sending out notices and questioning the possible jury so that they could be selected. On September the 4th 2000 juries began to be selected by computer. This was done to make jury service more attractive and stop thousands of people a year evading jury service. The computer selects jurors from electoral rolls, issues summonses and liases with courts on the number of jurors needed. This improved the lot of the juror by eliminating time spent hanging around waiting for trials and sometimes to be never called at all. It also centralised all requests to be excused jury service so that they are treated confidentially and fairly. The selection of juries can be challenged, by either challenging the array or challenging the course, i.e. if the defendant believes the jury is bias. B, Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using a jury to hear a criminal trial There are a great number of advantages and disadvantages of using a jury to hear a criminal trial. ...read more.


However, despite representing different cultures within society, certain individuals may be prejudice or biased. For example, against the police or racially prejudiced. Such as in the case ofR v Gregory (1993), where a juror showed racial overtones. Media coverage may influence jurors, eg R v Taylor (1993) - newspapers gave false impression of video sequence, and in addition to this, the more recent trial such as the Ian Huntley case. Jurors may not understand the case that they are trying. The Runciman Commission (1992) informed us that just under 10% of jurors admitted difficulty with a case. The juries usually have no legal knowledge or training. A disadvantage linked to this is that there is no intelligence test required. A person may not have to be "intellectual" to be on a jury, but surely a certain amount of intelligence is required for understanding of trials. Other disadvantages include the jury having a financial interest in the length of trials, that "nobbling" may occur, whereby the jury are bribed or threatened, and finally that it is a slow and expensive process, with 12 people needing expenses during the time the trial is on. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    The use of the electoral roll as the means of selecting people for jury service naturally means that some of the population will be excluded, as not everyone is entitled to vote, let alone taking into account the various exceptions under the Juries Acts and so on.

  2. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    It's just that he's such a dumb son of a bitch. He's about the dumbest man I think I've ever run across...I never will know what got into me when I made that appointment, and I'm as sorry as I can be for doing it" (Miller in Bowles p191).

  1. Describe how civil disputes can be resolved without going to court (this does not ...

    1996 it states that if this happens then the party with an arbitrator can appoint him as the sole arbitrator of the proceedings. But only if that party gives the other party written notice and the party receiving does not react within seven days of that notice been served.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    Once the list of potential jurors is acknowledged, both the prosecution and the defence have the right to see that list. Jury vetting is used to check that jurors are suitable for the case. Routine police checks are made on prospective jurors to eliminate those disqualified.

  1. Court proceedings.

    To seek a specially composed jury for certain cases suggests that the ordinary random jury is not able to perform its task in the required way. If that is the case, then surely the whole jury system should be reformed, and not merely in certain cases.

  2. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    Athens was also known as a place for new ideas, and his ideas were instead criticised. He did worship the God Apollo, a recognised by the state, which also contradicts the charge that he did not believe in the orthodox gods.

  1. Why was the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) created?

    There were three main criticisms in this report; firstly that there was confusion between the functions and responsibilities of the police, the investigators and the prosecution and that there was conflict of interest between the two and the prosecution buyers.

  2. The English Court System

    Bringing an appeal is subject to obtaining ?permission?, which may be granted by the court below or, more usually, by the Court of Appeal itself. Applications for permission to appeal are commonly determined by a single Lord Justice, full appeals by two or three judges.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work