• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown court trial

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A, Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown court trial The right to trial by jury can be traced back to Magna Carta (The Great Charter of Liberties, 1215) and the independence of the jury from the judge was established in Bushell's Case (1670). In criminal cases, the jury make the decision whether the defendant is guilty or not guilt. However, this is approximately only 3% of all crimes, and these are heard in the Crown Court. In civil cases, the jury decide if the claimant has proved their case and the amount of damages (compensation). Nevertheless, it is a right in only four types of civil case, which are: defamation over �10,000, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and fraud. In other civil cases it is discretionary. To be on a jury you need to qualify. To qualify for jury service a person must be aged between 18 and 70, registered on the electoral roll, and they must have lived in the UK for at least five years since the age of 13. ...read more.

Middle

The method of selection has changed in the last few years. The old method involved sending out notices and questioning the possible jury so that they could be selected. On September the 4th 2000 juries began to be selected by computer. This was done to make jury service more attractive and stop thousands of people a year evading jury service. The computer selects jurors from electoral rolls, issues summonses and liases with courts on the number of jurors needed. This improved the lot of the juror by eliminating time spent hanging around waiting for trials and sometimes to be never called at all. It also centralised all requests to be excused jury service so that they are treated confidentially and fairly. The selection of juries can be challenged, by either challenging the array or challenging the course, i.e. if the defendant believes the jury is bias. B, Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using a jury to hear a criminal trial There are a great number of advantages and disadvantages of using a jury to hear a criminal trial. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, despite representing different cultures within society, certain individuals may be prejudice or biased. For example, against the police or racially prejudiced. Such as in the case ofR v Gregory (1993), where a juror showed racial overtones. Media coverage may influence jurors, eg R v Taylor (1993) - newspapers gave false impression of video sequence, and in addition to this, the more recent trial such as the Ian Huntley case. Jurors may not understand the case that they are trying. The Runciman Commission (1992) informed us that just under 10% of jurors admitted difficulty with a case. The juries usually have no legal knowledge or training. A disadvantage linked to this is that there is no intelligence test required. A person may not have to be "intellectual" to be on a jury, but surely a certain amount of intelligence is required for understanding of trials. Other disadvantages include the jury having a financial interest in the length of trials, that "nobbling" may occur, whereby the jury are bribed or threatened, and finally that it is a slow and expensive process, with 12 people needing expenses during the time the trial is on. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    so permitting the presiding judge to create a jury which included a number of people from ethnic minority backgrounds (Sanders & Young, 200:565). This suggestion, however, was never used as it was felt that race was not the only issue affecting juries, so there was no need to single out one issue over many.

  2. The jury system or right to a trial by jury is often described as ...

    However, following amendment of the Juries Act 1974 by the Criminal Justice Act 2003, such individuals are no longer considered ineligible for jury service9 (see recent Court of Appeal case R v Abdroikov; R v Green; R v Williamson10). A person summoned for jury service may be excused or have

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    Many of the jurors had seen these plays in their youth, and grew up with the feelings that Socrates was a 'bad character.' This is not just, because it meant that the jury were not willing to fully accept both sides of the argument, as they did not favour Socrates.

  2. Demonstrate your understanding of both the UK civil and criminal court systems and their ...

    In criminal court the burden is "beyond a reasonable doubt," which means the jury needs to be quite sure before they find someone guilty. Most Acts of Parliament constitute public law and when an individual breaks such a law it is, more-often-than-not, defined as criminal.

  1. Description of the jury system

    Governed by the Juries (Disqualification) Act 1984 and CRIMPO 1994, disqualification of jury service applies to certain people for certain periods of time. Any person who has served more than 5 years in custody is disqualified from jury service. Any person that has had a custodial sentence or suspended sentence

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    justice because they would review cases when new scientific evidence or arguement. Advantages of the CCRC are that in January 2011 statistics published showed that they had instigated 310 quashed convictions. This shows that without the CCRC many miscarriages of justice would not have been dealt with.

  1. Why was the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) created?

    Secondly the prosecution of offender should be independent, impartial and fair and most importantly been seen as being the last three points, along with this criticism they questioned how the police could be involved the investigation and prosecution when the prosecution should only be seeking out the truth and not just be concerned about winning or losing a case.

  2. The English Court System

    The Civil Division of the Court Appeal also deals with family cases. The Court of Appeal Criminal Division hears appeals from Crown Court, or from convictions in magistrates' court but where defendant has been sentenced by the Crown Court. It appeals against conviction on matters of law may be made

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work