• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown court.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Law Gary Polmeer Juries a) Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown court. For all court appearances, jurors are selected randomly, by an official at the crown court from the electoral registers. In order to be selected for a jury the person must be: between the ages of 18-70; have lived in the country for at least 5years and be registered as a parliamentary elector. In 2003 a new act was passed, The Criminal Justice Act, this meant that everybody was eligible to be called for jury service. This new act does not excuse anyone in the legal profession, justice system or the health system. The only people who don't have to serve jury service are those who are disqualified. Disqualifications include: those who have served a prison sentence of 5years or more; those who have served a prison sentence in the last 10years; those who are currently performing community service; and those who are currently on bail at the time of being called for jury service. ...read more.

Middle

After this they have two hours to reach a verdict which has to be a unanimous decision, which the foreman will later announce in Court. During their two hours, the jury have to carefully review and discuss the facts of the case. However, if the jury are unable to agree on a decision unanimously the judge may accept a majority of ten to two or eleven to one. If the majority is less than this, the jury is given extra time to decide the final verdict - guilty or not guilty. Once the jury do come to a decision they don't have to give their reason for their choice and then the sentencing is left to the judge. Juries are only needed in cases where the defendant pleads 'not guilty' so their role is extremely important as their decision will affect the defendants for the rest of their life. b) Consider whether jury trials should be abolished. Many people have their own views on jury trials and whether they are good or should be abolished. ...read more.

Conclusion

This may lead to the defendant not receiving a fair trial which is the reason behind jury trials. Although there are many reasons why people wish to have jury trials abolished there are also many advantages to them. Many people feel that a jury trial is fairer as the defendant is tried by twelve random individuals and this leads to minimal biases as it is more than one person's opinion. The members of the jury, members of the general public, will also be able to relate to the defendant and their culture more and this leads to the defendant feeling he is being tried by his own peers making the whole court procedure more bearable. From these reasons I can see why people want to abolish the jury trials, but equally why there are many people who want to keep the traditional style of Crown Court cases. In my view they should keep the jury trials as the main factor I feel is how the defendant feels during the whole case as they may be innocent and would much prefer to be tried by a jury containing members of the general public. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    cases (James & Raine, 1998:42), to allowing judiciary to 'engineer' racially mixed juries (Sanders & Young, 2000:565), to a reformation of committal proceedings in Magistrates' courts (Davies et al, 1998:198). Since the Commission submitted its' report to the government in 1993, some of the recommendations have been implemented, and others ignored.

  2. ' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

    What matters is its practical significance. Juries verdicts have been called 'perverse' in the past. Juries refused to convict MS sufferers who use cannabis to ease their pain. Madness? It seems that in a case such as this the jury would be better equipped to judge. Possibly more understands, on the same wavelength so to speak.

  1. The jury system or right to a trial by jury is often described as ...

    26, Juries, 1. Constitution and Duties of Juries, para. 548 Juries Act 1974 s20(1) Juries Act 1825 s26 Juries Act 1974 s 9B Juries Act 1974 s 9(3) Muirhead v Evans (1851) 6 Exch 447 at 449 R v Abdroikov; R v Green; R v Williamson [2005] EWCA Crim 1986.

  2. Jury decision making: Discuss the effectiveness of jury decision making.

    both had the same results. Another study by Stewart (1980) found that white American university students were more likely to say that a black man was guilty of committing a crime than a white man even though the crimes were the same, leading us to believe that black defendants would receive harsher sentencing.

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    to the importance of various pieces of evidence and even giving some indication of the plausibility of various explanations of the same facts. The judge explains the need of the jury to reach a unanimous verdict if possible. The jury will then retire to then jury room having elected one

  2. Why do young people join gangs and other subcultures? How does a criminal sub ...

    They are known as double failures, thus retreating into a world of sex, drugs, and alcohol. Cloward and Ohlin further state that the varying form of delinquent subcultures depended upon the degree of integration that was present in the community.

  1. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    Unrepresented defendants have the right to have a 'McKenzie friend' in court with them. This person can sit with the defendant, take notes, and offer quiet suggestions, but is not allowed to address the court. This right was established in a case called McKenzie v McKenzie3, but since many courts

  2. Why was the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) created?

    system, so with this the Crown prosecution service was divided into 31 areas so that each area covered one or two police areas under the control of the DPP. By 1987 there was four regional directors that had been appointed to help with the running of the 31 areas, however

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work