• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain How the Human Rights Act Incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into English Law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain How the Human Rights Act Incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into English Law First to explain how the European Convention on Human Rights is incorporated into English law we must understand what the European Convention on Human Rights actually is. When the European Convention on Human Rights was drafted the United Kingdom played a major role in the drafting of it and was the first country to ratify it. The European Convention on Human Rights is a treaty that countries signed which contains articles on basic human rights. Before these rights were incorporated into English Law the rights in the treaty had very little effect domestically in the United Kingdom. One effect it had was that if a defendant had exhausted all the available options domestically an appeal could go to the European Court on Human Rights in Strasbourg. This was of little use as it would not only take a long time for the case to get there, but if the United Kingdom was found to be violating the defendants Human Rights the court could only offer compensation of �10,000. ...read more.

Middle

This does not go as far as entrenching our Rights but it does set them out in an act which means they are actually part of our law. Entrenching our rights is like for example the American Constitution where their rights are entrenched as it takes, for it to be changed, more than 3/4 of the states to agree to it. This means it is so hard to change that the rights are as such entrenched. No Law made in American can violate the constitution. Our rights are not entrenched because all it would take is for an Act of Parliament to wipe out the Human Rights Act and also Acts of Parliament can violate the Human Rights Act because under section 19 all a Bill needs is a statement of incompatibility in the bills 2nd reading for it to pass to become an Act (For Example the Anti Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill was in violation of Human Rights and all Parliament needed to continue with the Bill was a statement of incompatibility for it to continue, although it was rejected by the House of Lords, possibly due to the fact that it violated Human Rights). ...read more.

Conclusion

Although if this is not possible the domestic legislation will be used rather than the European Convention on Human Rights. This is different before as before the Human Rights Act the European Convention on Human Rights could only be used if the wording of the act was ambiguous. s.4 - Courts can issue a declaration of incompatibility if a piece of domestic legislation is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. s.6 - Makes it unlawful for a public body to act in a way that is not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, unless allowed to do so by primary legislation. s.7 - Allows a defendant to use their rights in domestic courts if the European Convention on Human Rights has been breached. This is so cases don't need to be brought to Strasbourg although it is still possible to do that if domestic options have been exhausted. s.19 - This is the statement of incompatibility whereby Parliament can still pass an Act as long as a statement is made in the 2nd reading that the Bill is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. These are how the Human Rights act incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into our Law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    Art 13; the right to an effective domestic legal remedy in the event of breach of the Convention rights/freedoms. This was not incorporated, as it was believed that the ECHR and HRA provided for this just by being in existence.

  2. 'The Human Rights Act 1998 has a significant impact on

    upon the legality of the exercise of public powers 'if proceedings are brought on an application for judicial review it is a claim which seeks to review the unlawfulness of the enactment or a decision, action or failure to act in relation to the exercise of a public function.'11 Clayton and Tomlinson argue that since section 7(3)

  1. Can the Islamic approach to Human Rights be compatible withthe current International Human Rights ...

    Nevertheless, there is such an increased trend in violation of the women lives, even though few of them are not specifically subject to the women or just appeared as an abusing to community or men. Bunch, indicated this fact by provoking as follows: "Significant numbers of the world's population are

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    The present author submits that the Court's decision is understandable, as perhaps disregarding gravity element in Art. 3 completely would be too far-reaching, which proves the argument of ECHR's relative unsuitability for children, especially in modern progressive society. However, significantly the European Commission's reference to UNCRC, particularly Art.

  1. The right to a fair trial is one of the key points established within ...

    There has been no fair hearing, both in having it in a reasonable time and it has not been independent. There has been no presumption of innocence and from what I can gather from the transcripts there have been no cross-examinations made.

  2. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    of national legislation, even if adopted subsequently, and it is not necessary for the court to request or await the prior setting aside of such provisions by legislative or other constitutional means.40 The European Community law takes precedence over national law.

  1. Are the Human Rights Act 1998 and the doctrine of Parliamentary supremacy compatible?

    It is C. A. Gearty's belief that with the enactment of the Human Rights Act, Parliament intended to retain their supremacy.6 Which of course makes sense as there is no logical reason why Parliament would knowingly do away with such a valuable power. Through the reading of the Human Rights Act 1998, evidence to

  2. Assess the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on UK law.

    The UK has one of the worst records in Europe; only Italy has a worst record, of breaching Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights. A Bill of Rights would protect UK citizens against such breaches. There are advantages of having a Bill of Rights, the main two being restricting the executive and the attitude of the judiciary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work