• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain How the Human Rights Act Incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into English Law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain How the Human Rights Act Incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into English Law First to explain how the European Convention on Human Rights is incorporated into English law we must understand what the European Convention on Human Rights actually is. When the European Convention on Human Rights was drafted the United Kingdom played a major role in the drafting of it and was the first country to ratify it. The European Convention on Human Rights is a treaty that countries signed which contains articles on basic human rights. Before these rights were incorporated into English Law the rights in the treaty had very little effect domestically in the United Kingdom. One effect it had was that if a defendant had exhausted all the available options domestically an appeal could go to the European Court on Human Rights in Strasbourg. This was of little use as it would not only take a long time for the case to get there, but if the United Kingdom was found to be violating the defendants Human Rights the court could only offer compensation of �10,000. ...read more.

Middle

This does not go as far as entrenching our Rights but it does set them out in an act which means they are actually part of our law. Entrenching our rights is like for example the American Constitution where their rights are entrenched as it takes, for it to be changed, more than 3/4 of the states to agree to it. This means it is so hard to change that the rights are as such entrenched. No Law made in American can violate the constitution. Our rights are not entrenched because all it would take is for an Act of Parliament to wipe out the Human Rights Act and also Acts of Parliament can violate the Human Rights Act because under section 19 all a Bill needs is a statement of incompatibility in the bills 2nd reading for it to pass to become an Act (For Example the Anti Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill was in violation of Human Rights and all Parliament needed to continue with the Bill was a statement of incompatibility for it to continue, although it was rejected by the House of Lords, possibly due to the fact that it violated Human Rights). ...read more.

Conclusion

Although if this is not possible the domestic legislation will be used rather than the European Convention on Human Rights. This is different before as before the Human Rights Act the European Convention on Human Rights could only be used if the wording of the act was ambiguous. s.4 - Courts can issue a declaration of incompatibility if a piece of domestic legislation is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. s.6 - Makes it unlawful for a public body to act in a way that is not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, unless allowed to do so by primary legislation. s.7 - Allows a defendant to use their rights in domestic courts if the European Convention on Human Rights has been breached. This is so cases don't need to be brought to Strasbourg although it is still possible to do that if domestic options have been exhausted. s.19 - This is the statement of incompatibility whereby Parliament can still pass an Act as long as a statement is made in the 2nd reading that the Bill is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. These are how the Human Rights act incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into our Law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    Art 13; the right to an effective domestic legal remedy in the event of breach of the Convention rights/freedoms. This was not incorporated, as it was believed that the ECHR and HRA provided for this just by being in existence.

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    The present author submits that the Court's decision is understandable, as perhaps disregarding gravity element in Art. 3 completely would be too far-reaching, which proves the argument of ECHR's relative unsuitability for children, especially in modern progressive society. However, significantly the European Commission's reference to UNCRC, particularly Art.

  1. Can the Islamic approach to Human Rights be compatible withthe current International Human Rights ...

    routinely subject to torture, starvation, terrorism, humiliation, mutilation, and even murder simply because they are female. Crimes such as these against any group other than women would be recognised as a civil and political emergency as well as a gross violation of the victims' humanity."

  2. 'The Human Rights Act 1998 has a significant impact on

    that meets the UK's ECHR obligations.8 Although, the Act does not enable courts to strike down legislation which is incompatible with the Convention, clause 3 requires the courts to read legislation in a way that 'so far as possible' gives effect to the Convention rights.9 Using the test on what

  1. Assess the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on UK law.

    This in turn would be a powerful incentive for a government to avoid introducing such legislation in the first place. The provision in s.19 of the Human Rights Act 1998, requiring ministers to state whether a Bill conforms with the 1998 Act, this will discourage the executive in some circumstances

  2. Discuss the extent of the states obligations under articles 2 and 3 of the ...

    The extent of the public authority's obligation, however, is limited to that which is reasonable5. In6 Mr Justice Cazalet made clear that Article 2 does not require the prolongation of life in all circumstances. He said, "There does not appear to be a decision of the European Court which indicates

  1. Statutory Interpretation

    The ECJ employs a "rule of effectiveness" which means that preference should be given to the construction which gives a rule its fullest effect and it takes a contextual approach, referring to the general scheme of the Treaty, or other Treaty provisions.

  2. The right to a fair trial is one of the key points established within ...

    Of particular concern is clause 21(2) (c), which states that a person is a suspected international terrorist if he or she "has links with a person who is a member of or belongs to an international terrorist group." A "link" with a member of a terrorist group may be too

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work