• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

explain judicial precedent

Extracts from this document...


Judicial Precedent Judicial precedent refers to the source of law where past decisions of the judges create law for future judges to follow. Ratio decidendi is the reason for deciding, it creates precedent for judges to follow in future cases. The ratio decidendi is the core to the decision, it is binding on similar cases heard by later judges. Original precedent is where if the points of law have never been decided before then whatever the judge decides will form a new precedent. Stare Decisis is stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established. This makes the system consistent, fair and predictable, higher courts bind lower courts. Stare Decisis allow previous decisions to influence later in similar cases and ensures that higher courts bind lower courts. Obiter Dicta is other things said and judges in future do not have to follow it, It includes the judges thought processes, The judges explanation as to why one decision was arrived at rather than another and how the judge is going to apply the decision to the present case. ...read more.


two things, the existence of a dispute over a point of law between two contesting legal parties and the ability and the desire of both parties to pursue the matter further, if this is not the case, the legal point is not clarified and lives to be heard another day. Inferior courts are those below the high court level. They cannot establish precedent. They follow the rulings of the courts above them. The court of appeal civil and criminal are bound by their previous rulings to an certain extent. A ruling in young v Bristol aeroplane company led to a certain degree of flexibility. The house of lords is the highest court that sits in the UK. It sets precedent for all courts below it when dealing with English law. It does not always have to follow its own previous decision since the practice statement 1966 which allowed it some flexibility I this area. ...read more.


Advantages of precedent * Fairness - each case is treated the same if the facts are close enough to each other. * Consistency - There is consistency between cases that strengthens the system and also allows for some prediction of the result. * Saving time - The system Saves time for all those involved in the case. The arguments have already been analysed and decided upon. * Sources of law - Precedent produces a valuable source of law within which legal personal can operate. It provides a foundation for the legal system and is particularly useful for training lawyers. * Real life - case law is real life. Law that comes from this source is not subject to problems of drafting, which often occur with parliamentary legislation. * Inflexibility - instead of looking at each case afresh, Previous decisions have to be used. This might reduce freshness with which case is looked at. Disadvantages of precedent * Ridgity * Complexity * Illogical distinctions * Slowness of growth ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher


    4 star(s)

    You can also overrule the courts below you. In the Criminal Cases they follow the same pattern; the courts are bound to make any decision made by a court above it in the hierarchy. For example the Magistrates Court are bound by or have binding precedent from the Crown Court because it is higher up in the hierarchy.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial Precedent

    3 star(s)

    Obiter dicta are not binding but they are persuasive. Persuasive precedents are precedents which may be followed by judges in the future should they choose. Should a judge choose to follow the obiter dicta of an earlier case, that obiter dicta then becomes the ratio decidendi of the later case.

  1. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    (c) The House of Lords The house of lords was not included in the supreme court of judicature.

  2. Judicial Precedent

    The court decided that the word meant to be involved in a marital ceremony rather than being legally in a state of wedlock - otherwise it would have been legally impossible for anyone to commit bigamy, because the second marriage would not have been valid and therefore there would not have been a second spouse.

  1. Judicial Precedent

    The House of Lords is the highest criminal court, unlike in the civil courts system. It binds all the lower courts and since the 1966 Practise Direction it no longer has to follow its own previous decisions, although in practise it usually does so.

  2. AS LAW - Judicial Precedent

    They can come from 1) Courts lower in the hierarchy e.g. R v R (1991) In this case the law lords followed the same reasoning as the Court of Appeal in deciding that a man could be guilty of raping his wife. 2) Privy Council decisions.

  1. Law case study

    he deduced that "social workers may be the first point of contact for disabled people seeking to access their legal rights" (Social Work and the Law in Scotland, 2003, Pg. 115) Grandparents Charter The grandparents charter which at present is only a proposal is for giving wider recognition to the role played by grandparents.

  2. The doctrine of precedent comes from the Latin maxim stare decisis or stand by ...

    The House of Lords issued the 1966 Practice Statement as a way for them to depart from a previous decision when they thought it 'right to do so'. It was issued due to the 'rigid adherence of precedent' which could lead to 'injustice in a particular case and unduly restrict

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work