• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the meaning of the term "causation"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Explain the meaning of the term ?causation? Sometimes the defendant?s actions have to result in a particular consequence. These are known as result crimes; an example would be assault occasioning actual bodily harm, where the conduct is assault and the result ABH. The rules of causation decide whether the defendants act caused the prohibited consequence. The court must establish both causation in fact, and causation in law. To determine factual causation, the ?but for? test is used. This says that but for the defendants conduct, would the victim have suffered the harm. ...read more.

Middle

Once factual causation has been established, the court must then establish legal causation. This asks whether the defendant made a significant contribution to the injury. In R v Blaue a Jehovah ?s Witness was stabbed and refused a blood transfusion, that would have saved her life. She later died, and the defendant was found guilty as he made a significant contribution to her death. If a victim acts in a foreseeable way such as in R v Roberts, where a woman was being sexually abused and jumped out of a car, then the defendant is liable, as there is no break in the chain. ...read more.

Conclusion

If there is a break in the chain of causation, the defendant may not be liable. This can be seen in R v Jordan, where a man was stabbed, and whilst in hospital died from a reaction to an injection. The medical negligence was said to be ?palpably wrong? and so was significant enough to break the chain of causation, this meant that the defendant was not guilty of murder, although could still be found guilty of wounding under s.18 offences against the person act 1861. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Looking at the offences of Assault, Battery, Actual bodily harm and Grievous really serious ...

    I am now going to see if she would be guilty of a section 20 offence. I am now going to look at the defence of Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH). Ann should be convicted of GBH because; this case has quite similar circumstances to that of Eisenhower (1984).

  2. Explain what is meant by the term causation in criminal law and assess how ...

    The court of appeal said to make D guilty v act had to be foreseeable and also had to be in proportion with the threat. The question asked was whether the victim?s conduct was: ?within the ambit of reasonableness and not so daft as to make his own voluntary act

  1. Explain what is meant by the term 'causation' in criminal law and assess how ...

    However, should religious grounds be enough to make the defendant liable for the consequence and not just the act committed? Here, the case of Deer could be relevant, as the defendant was still guilty even though the victim?s acts could have saved their life.

  2. Nina runs a burger bar. She puts up a sign in the window saying ...

    Nina's actions would fulfill both of these aspects of the test, as she clearly knew she was being dishonest through her advertising, and any reasonable person would also reach this conclusion. From all of this analysis, it is possible to conclude that Nina has committed an act of fraud under Section 2(a)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work