• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the role of the ECJ.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the role of the ECJ. The European Court of Justice is needed to apply and police the rules of the European Union. The ECJ protects its members interests by enforcing EU law, however the ECJ cannot use EU law to expand the EU's powers; it has to abide to strict rules, or judgements based on the treaty commitments and laws that member states agree to. Even if the constitutional treaty is ratified, this will still be the case. Article 220 of the EC Treaty provides that the role of the ECJ is 'to ensure that, in the interpretation and application of the Treaty, the law is observed.' It makes sure that EU legislation is interpreted and applied in the same way in all EU countries, so that the law is equal for everyone. It ensures, for example, that national courts do not give different rulings on the same issue. ...read more.


The first being that it hears cases which decide if member states do not comply with the obligations under the treaty. An example of this is in the case of Tachographs in 1979, this is when the United Kingdom was told it had to use council regulation on the use of mechanical recording equipment (Tachographs) in road vehicles used for the carriage of goods. The other key function is preliminary rulings; this is when the court hears rulings from national courts, in order for preliminary rulings of points of European Law. This is of great importance, as all decisions made are naturally binding on all courts in member states. To request a preliminary ruling Article 234 under the treaty of Rome is required. And states the following "The court if Justice shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning: (a) the interpretation of treaties; (b) ...read more.


It has a total of 12 judges, of which there can be panels of six, four or three judges. There is 27 of the EU's national legal systems are represented. The Court is assisted by eight 'advocates-general' whose role is to present reasoned opinions on the cases brought before the Court. They must do so publicly and impartially. The Court may meet in plenary session, or create chambers of three or five judges. Only a single judgement is delivered in each case, signed by all judges, without any differing opinions. Therefore, all decisions are both unanimous and anonymous, preventing any attempt to attribute the result to the nationality of the judges deciding A newly introduced structure to the European courts by the treaty of Nice is the creation of specialised judicial panels. Allowing for the creation of specialised tribunal's means it is now possible, following a practice in the Member States, that a specialised EU tribunal could be created to deal with disputes in the field of employment and industrial relations. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    The question of whether Directives had horizontal direct effects arose in the case of Marshall v Southampton and South West Hampshire HA21. This case concerned the effect of Directive 76/207 on Equal Treatment of Men and Women in Employment. The ECJ held that the Directive had direct effects, and the

  2. Marked by a teacher

    LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

    4 star(s)

    The hotel may also be liable under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957, given that Beatrice is an invited visitor who has sustained injury due to the dangerous condition of the premises. Summary No substantial defences to these actions appear to be available, given the facts as they stand, thus the

  1. Evaluate police powers of arrest, detention and search.

    restored to them if the police are unable to gather sufficient evidence to sustain the person being charged with an offence. Powers of detention arise, more-often-than-not, following arrest but before the detained person is charged with any offence. However a person may be lawfully detained without actually being arrested.

  2. Law and Judicial creativity

    In this case, the defendant was convicted under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1965 by the High Court, but the House of Lords reversed this decision, claiming that the matter required a blameworthy state of mind. Courts are also able to distinguish between cases, which refers to cases having the same

  1. Free essay

    Legal personnel

    The former judicial appointments procedure for judges did not have a fixed criterion, so both the candidates and the clue what they were being judged on. It was also based on social networking, therefore leaving it open to class discrimination and as a result the majority of judges were white upper and middle class males.

  2. The task of the jury is to weigh up the evidence presented to them ...

    Breach of this section is counted as a criminal offence. There are a couple of advantages for secrecy and disadvantages. Advantages * It ensures people to speak their mind in the jury room * It stops unreliable disclosures by jurors and misunderstanding of verdict * It ensures the finality of

  1. Family Law

    to move on to Divorce, method by which a legal marriage is brought to an end. The operative legislation governing divorce is Matrimonial causes act 1973 S1 (1) states that; .....A petition for divorce may be represented to the court by either party to a marriage on the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.

  2. The Selection and Role of Juries

    The court clerk will select 12 out of the 15 potential jurors at random to sit on the jury. If any of the jury members know or recognise the parties to the hearing, they must inform the court. It is then the decision of the judge as to whether this jury member is to stand down or proceed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work