• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How are human rights protected in the UK system? What is the basic relationship between the UK courts and Strasbourg?

Extracts from this document...


How are human rights protected in the UK system? What is the basic relationship between the UK courts and Strasbourg? When considering how human rights are protected in the UK, it is important to consider how traditional approaches to human rights protection have proved ineffective. The Diceyan approach stated that common law protected human rights, allowing people to be as 'free' as they like, as long as the law allowed them to be (i.e. Entick v Carrington [1765). This reliance on common law proved to be ineffective in protecting human rights for a number of reasons. If the common law allows citizens to be 'free' to anything not prohibited by law, the same applies to the Government, which may violate individual freedom in this manner (i.e. Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner). Additionally, while Parliament in previous centuries could provide a 'watchdog' on executive power, this is no longer the case in the 20th/21st century where the party system has lead to majority based governments that can enact statutory legislation with minimal restrictions. ...read more.


The addition of the Human Rights Act (HRA) [1998] allowed for Convention rights to be enforced in the domestic courts, thus removing the need for an individual to go Strasbourg to enforce their Convention rights and incorporating the ECHR into domestic law. The Act has been a substantial addition to the protection of human rights. Despite the government's insistence that the HRA would not allow courts to strike down primary legislation, section 3 allows courts to make declarations of incompatibility with the ECHR (as observed over the Mental Health Act 1983). This feature counters the modern concern of an overtly powerful government. It does not diminish parliamentary power to pass Acts of Parliament, but legislation ruled incompatible is highly damaged and will require revision or suffer from wide technical difficulties. The Human Rights Act, while not being a comprehensive protectorate of human rights, is nonetheless essential in this respect and adds extra weight to the Diceyan concept that common law can protect individual rights. ...read more.


Firstly, the European court ensures that Human rights as stated in the ECHR are adhered to by States under its jurisdiction. Secondly, this has lead to legislative changes in the UK system based on cases ruled in breach of the ECHR (i.e. Dudgeon v UK lead to the Homosexual Offences Order 1982). However, this seemingly powerful influence of Strasbourg is not comprehensive as the UK government has the ability to not give European Court decisions any effect (i.e. Adulaziz v UK, Brogan v UK). It can be argued that the relationship between the UK and Strasbourg 'skeletal' in nature, as the UK has ensured it retains 'parliamentary sovereignty' and ultimate power over how individual rights are treated. The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (detention without trial of terrorist suspects) highlighted the government's ability to deviate from Convention principles. Despite this, it is indisputable that the HRA, the ECHR and the Strasbourg institutions act as vital checks and remedies to the potential abuses of human rights in the UK, where the legislature is underlined by the concept that it is unequivocally 'supreme'. John Tippett-Cooper ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    the english legal system unit1 assignment4

    4 star(s)

    a judicial system that relies heavily on oral trials, judges need clear argument and guidance to lead them to the correct decision. Such a service can only be provided by a select group of professional advocates. (b) Q: What are the advantages and disadvantages of there being a Ministry of Justice in the UK?

  2. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    The defendant claimed that this went against his convention right of the presumption of innocence under Article 6(2). The House of Lords held that section 22(4) prohibited a person convicted of a criminal offence before commencement from relying on the convention at an appeal after commencement.

  1. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    Each of the above division also exercises certain jurisdictions through the medium of a divisional court, i.e. a court composed of two or more judges. The jurisdiction of the divisional courts of the family and chancery division is purely appellate (i.e.

  2. Human Rights

    Furthermore, Australia has no coercive powers to ensure that witnesses from other nation states attend court to give evidence, and so prosecutions can only proceed with the willingness of the witness. Lastly, the frequent, recent breach of child prostitution overseas by Australian citizens in itself displays the ineffectiveness of the legislation.

  1. EU law and Human Rights

    Calls for reform of this sort of old-fashioned law came loud and clear, especially in light of the phenomenal achievements of the ECHR which gave their counterparts across the continent access to a whole multitude of rights which British people can only ASSUME they have6.

  2. "Public policy has been slow to treat disability as a matter of equality, human ...

    However having said that, the right to a decent education is one which is a fundamental human right, and if the education system is sociologically assessed it more than a mere academic institution, it is one which plays a primary role in our socialisation into society and realisation of our citizenship roles.

  1. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    Kebilene [2002] 2 AC 326, 367, "that the carefully and subtly drafted Human Rights Act preserves the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty". Jack Straw, at the Bill's second reading in the Commons, propounded that "what the HRA makes clear is that Parliament is supreme, and that if Parliament wishes to maintain


    The extent of their note issues was also limited by the public's willingness to hold their notes. Unwanted notes were returned to the issuing bank and converted into specie. Bank notes were well received by the public and became the principal means of payment in British North America.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work