• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective were the Liberal Reforms between 1906 and 1914?

Extracts from this document...


How effective were the Liberal Reforms between 1906 and 1914? Paul Davidson Before the 1900s most politicians thought that the poor had brought on their money problems themselves, and there was no health care, education, social services, unemployment benefit at all. If you were in poverty you would have to find your own way out of it, the government had no involvement in the problems among the poor of Britain. This was widely known as "Self Help". The huge scale of the Liberal party's victory in the 1906 general election guaranteed many new faces among the ranks of Liberal MPs, in favour of change in the field of social welfare. Between the years 1906 and 1914, the Liberals took steps to improve the health standards and the living and working conditions of the lower class. The main areas of people who the new legislation was targeted on was the working class under risk of poverty due to sickness or unemployment, their children and old age pensioners. The effectiveness of Liberal rule on these matters is not clear, as much of the legislation introduced to solve poverty problems, can be argued to be unsuccessful at what it was intended to achieve. The first task undertaken by the new Liberal government was the welfare of children. The issue of children too hungry or generally debilitated was well documented by 1906. By 1911, less than a third of all education authorities were using rates to support school meal provision and it had taken until 1914 for the Board of Education to make such provision compulsory. ...read more.


Nevertheless, it can be argued that they were very slow to reform, as the first payments were not made until the summer of 1912 for unemployment and the beginning of 1913 for health. The Friendly Societies, industrial insurance companies and doctors would all be affected by the intrusion of the state into this kind of benefit provision. The insurance companies and friendly societies collected millions of pounds a year from working-class families, which may explain why it took so long to negotiate suitable compromises and safeguards with the various companies. The National Insurance Act was in two distinct parts. Part one dealt with health insurance and part two with unemployment insurance. A sickness benefit of 10s per week for 13 weeks (7s 6d for women) and 5s a week for a further 13 weeks there after was the main entitlement. This act was a positive move by the Liberals towards reducing poverty, as due to health levels being so bad at the time many were left sick with no way of receiving money. On the other hand, this Act may not have been very successful due to a number of reasons. The fact that this scheme did not cover hospital treatment increased the risk of poverty. The Act only covered workers and not their families, which meant that there was still a risk of poverty if a member of the family needed medical treatment. ...read more.


They also failed to introduce direct measures to deal with the situation, such as government housing or a National Health Service. Therefore, Liberal legislation was successful on a small scale considering it did not effectively improve the poverty levels of the whole nation. Lastly, it can be argued that the Liberal rule was very successful in terms of the scale of task with which the new government was faced. The fact that the House of Lords was mainly Conservative meant that the Liberal legislation programme was regularly opposed, because Conservatives regarded Liberal policies as confiscation to property rights and a threat to any idea of individual responsibility. This can justify the amount of time taken to introduce various laws, such as the National Insurance Act and the Pensions Act. The amount of people below the poverty line at the time was estimated at being as high as one third of the population. A view that no other government could have dealt with the situation of poverty any more effectively at that time adds to the theory that the Liberals were as successful as they could have been under the circumstances. Liberal legislation between the years of 1906 to 1914 laid the foundations of a welfare state. The time spent in power may not have been long enough for the Liberal reform to make a clear improvement to the poverty situation due to the social state of the nation being so bad. This view shows that the Liberals were very successful at dealing with the situation if considering the magnitude of task they undertook. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Did the 'lower orders' generally benefit from the legislation-introduced by Tudor government to combat ...

    No allowances were made for the able-bodied man who was unemployed but genuinely wanted to work. The government continued to take no responsibility and assumed that employment was available for all that sought it. This inevitably put the non-vagrant, but able poor in an impossible position, unable to find employment yet forgiven by statute to beg.

  2. How successful were the Liberal Reforms of 1906-1914?

    Finally, the Children's act of 1908 introduced a consolidation of measures to deal with child neglect and abuse and set up juvenile courts and remand homes to remove child offenders from the adult courts and prisons. This Act ensured children were not living on the streets without food or education.

  1. Torts project - Payment of Compensation in Hit and Run Motor Accident.

    Notwithstanding anything contained), in the General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972 ( 57 of 1972 ), or any other law for the time being in force or any instrument having the force of law, the General Insurance Corporation of India formed under Section 9 of the said Act and

  2. Examine the extent to which liberal governments of 1906 -1915 succeeded in their aim ...

    It helped to improve the health of children but not the health conditions if adults or school leavers who were existing members of the Britain's workforce. In 1908 the government brought together all existing law relating to the protection of children under the 'Children's Charter'.

  1. Liberal reform 1906-1914

    Unemployment insurance covered far less workers: some 2.25 million, mainly in construction and engineering trades, which were susceptible to fluctuating employment levels. This insurance also required payment from the worker. Weekly contributions were 2.5d each from workers, employers and the Government, which entitled the workers to a payment of 7s a week for up to a maximum of 15 weeks.

  2. Indigenous peoples, almost without exception, have been dispossessed and disregarded by those who 'discovered' ...

    be held up as declarative of the law in the same way as might be expected in a domestic legal system. It can be said with some confidence that elements of state treatment of indigenous peoples have crystallised into customary international law8, including some rights to their traditional territories, and

  1. Explain Why the Liberal Government Introduced a Series of Reforms Between 1906-1914. What Reforms ...

    As I mentioned, the reforms benefited the young, the old, the unemployed, the workers and the sick. The majority of the reforms benefited the workers in 1909, and so the majority of them benefited them. The acts that benefited the workers were all very important, some more than others, and some were more successful than others.

  2. Judicial Reform and Bill of Rights.

    Despite this suggestion enhancing democracy in the country and possibly even enhancing sovereignty, there is the possible threat of the media influence corrupting voting behaviour and with the recent European elections, the imminent General election and the possibility of referendums on the Euro and other issues, British citizens may be less willing to contribute to the appointing of the judges.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work