• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effectively do the courts protect human rights?

Extracts from this document...


How Effectively Do The Courts Protect Human Rights? Before looking at this question in detail it is necessary to know what rights are. There are mainly two types of rights, the natural rights and the citizens' rights. The natural rights can be described as universal God-given and inalienable. These include rights to life, liberty and property. On the other hand, citizens' rights are those that are granted to citizens by the state. The United Kingdom does not have an entrenched "Bill of Rights" like the United States. This in theory means that there is no codified document setting out the various rights granted to the citizens of the United Kingdom. However, citizens' rights in the United Kingdom have been protected traditionally by a combination of statute law, common law and case law. Some of the most significant rights of a British citizen are freedom of expression, personal freedoms, political rights, right to own property and the right to freedom from torture. ...read more.


In some other cases a citizen might feel that they have been unfairly treated by a public body such as the NHS. In such cases the other cases of a similar nature are taken into account and all relative factors are considered. Cases of judicial review are not very common and are not usually successful. This is mainly due to the fact that there is a fusion of powers in the British political system. The Lord Chancellor who elects the judges is a member of the Prime Ministers cabinet and hence the judges might not be able to make a fair decision due to pressure from the government bodies. Also the judges cannot enforce their decisions. The European Court of Justice also helps protect the human rights. It is the main court of the European Union and interprets the Europe Union law and deals with disputes between the European states. However, it can also be used when citizens from the European states believe that their rights, guaranteed by the European law, have been neglected. ...read more.


However, chiefly it is the government majority that is decisive and makes the final decision. The House of Lords, although limited in its powers than the Commons, is also effective to an extent in protecting the human rights. It can delay legislation for a year and any amendments it proposes must be returned to the Commons for approval. For example, the Welfare Reform Bill in 1999. The reform to the membership of Lords in 1999 has potentially strengthened its independence. However, a strong determined government can easily get its way through the supremacy of the House of Commons. Lastly, the members of Parliament can also help to protect individual rights. They may take up cases of one or a group of their constituents. They are given fast access to ministers and senior civil servants. However, the government need not act on their requests. Hence, overall I can say that the courts are effective to an extent in protecting the human rights. However, it is due to several factors that I have mentioned above, some of which are more influential than the others. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    division, common pleas division, exchequer division, chancery division and probate, divorce and admiralty division, the high court of justice now consists of three division: queens bench division, the chancery division and the family division. Under s.4 of the Supreme Court act 1981, as amended by the constitutional reform act 2005,

  2. Examine the relationship between law and morals and consider whether the law should support ...

    He argues that criminal acts such as homosexuality (illegal when he was writing), abortion, and drug abuse do not harm innocents, only those who partake of their own free will. Since prohibition only pushes such activities underground, they should be decriminalised and left alone.

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    Very often, the Court has protected parents' privacy rather than child's own, as Eekelaar and Dingwall commented24. Olsson v. Sweden25 reflects this in that state interference with parents' Art. 8 rights required to be justified by strict necessity. Nielsen v.

  2. Law and Justice

    many over the needs of the few, disregarding social inequalities created in the process. The theorist Nozick believed that a truly just society should have the minimum possible right to intervene in the affairs of individuals; its function should be limited to ensuring the basic needs of society, such as prevention of crime, and the enforcement of contracts.

  1. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    a way which is compatible with Convention rights 'so far as it is possible to do so' Section 4- If such interpretation of primary legislation is not possible, a superior court may make a declaration that the legislation is incompatible with a Convention right, but this does not affect the

  2. "Public policy has been slow to treat disability as a matter of equality, human ...

    I believe this to be a positive step towards the overall aim of making the disabled population feel included in the mainstream social activities, for them to grow up within the society, rather than circle its periphery as they have done for far too long.

  1. Liberal reform 1906-1914

    A failure to introduce a set amount of working hours adds to this. The Liberals failed in their attempt to introduce an eight-hour day for the mining industry when they achieved power. It took two years to introduce an eight hour mining day in1908, and a further three to pass

  2. The European Convention of Human Rights

    Convention that are included in the Human Rights Act; this also includes the 1st and 6th protocols: the 1st is the right to protection of property, right to education and free elections and the 6th abolishes the death penalty. Convention rights that are not included although not covered by statute may still be effective in common law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work