• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How satisfactory is the current law of murder?

Extracts from this document...


How satisfactory is the current law of murder? During this essay the law of murder will need to be analysed and assessed in order to answer the question of it's current state. Whilst analysing the law of murder the Actus Reus and the Mens Rea along with any other problems will need to be dealt with. However we need to realise what the law of murder is and how it came into affect. Murder is a special law as it is a common law offence or rather a judge made law. What this means is that the law has been made over the years when cases arise. Due to this the law has been improvised and changed through the years due to the circumstances. Most pieces of legislation are acts of parliament that are produced by the parliament (House of Lords, House of Commons and the Queen), however judges have made this piece of legislation. The law of murder first can be claimed to be unsatisfactory or misleading due to the very fact that it is judge made law. This causes problems, as there are no guidelines to stick to, this led to many different outcomes occurring when sentencing and the law being called overcomplicated. ...read more.


So to find Malice Aforethought or Mens Rea it was stated in R v Vickers (1957) and R v Cunningham (1981) that, intention to cause GBH (grievous bodily harm) is enough to establish the MR of Murder not even to cause the death is necessary. This can cause problems, as it is not fair to accuse people of murder if they did not intend to kill, along with this if they are wrongfully accused they will face life imprisonment. Furthermore the test of 'Foresight of Consequences' allows more people to be sentenced for murder. This test is were the jury put themselves in the defendant's shoes. In R v Woolin the jury had to find the MR for murder if they felt that "At the material time the defendant could foresee as virtually certain that death or serious harm could occur". This can be criticised, as the jury only really need to find if the defendant wanted to cause serious harm, not murder. So the jury are using non-fatal guidelines of intention to cause GBH on a fatal offence. Many people have claimed that this test is to find intent that may not be there however in the case of Matthews & Alleyne (2003) ...read more.


The new proposals can be said is a step towards improvement as now the jury and judge have more options when sentencing. This makes it fairer as juries can now give more guilty verdicts without thinking that the sentence is too harsh and letting them off. However it will be hard to find defendants for first degree murder as the requirement is that they have the intention to kill. Along with this, critics have claimed second degree murder is a ticket to getting a lighter sentence, as the defendant needs to claim they were reckless. In retaliation the Commission said, "Taking a risk even a high risk of killing someone is recklessness and very serious but it is not the same as the deliberate taking of a life." The law of Murder has flaws in it however it is also quite good. The Actus Reus of Murder is fine and could be left to use without reform, as there are not many problems. However regarding the Mens Rea there is constant debate, and it needs to be reformed. As Jeremy Horder said, "the judiciary need to adapt to the 21st century," this could be done if the proposals of the law commission are adopted. The law has been around for over 50 years and will need reform to make it easier to use in the future. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Some good points made, especially on the proposed reforms. Some of the points about the the present law could be more accurately described.
Rating ***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 18/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Common Law and Equity

    5 star(s)

    The only remedy that the courts could offer were damages which was not always suitable. People became dissatisfied with the system as a result and started to petition the king as the 'fountain of justice' for a remedy. At first he dealt with the petitions himself but there were so

  2. Common Law and Equity Essay

    The judges acted as a "sifting process" where they would return to West minister and discuss the various laws that have been operated around the country. This enabled the judges, over a period of roughly 200 years, to take the best local laws and apply them throughout the land.

  1. Customer Service Legislation

    * A right to 4 weeks' paid leave a year. This can also reflect onto customer service. If an employer does not conform to these rules then their employees will be overworked so this can lead to ineffective customer service, which can ultimately lead to a loss in sales.

  2. Free essay

    How effective are domestic and international legal measures in dealing with human trafficking?

    One of the most problematic issues of eliminating trafficking is compliance with international law. Measures for compliance with international treaties include signature, ratification, and enforcement of international agreements. Once a state signs and ratifies a treaty, it is subject to monitoring by UN committees, which receive input from nongovernmental organisations.

  1. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    The current situation is that physical inspection may not uncover all overriding interests, as seen in cases such as Pettitt v. Pettitt (1970)32 and William & Glyn's Bank v. Boland (1981)33 it is these 'undiscoverable' minor interests that are a problem in our modern system.

  2. Commercial law discussion - 'Transfer of Title by a Non-Owner'.

    made by him...as mercantile agent shall...be valid as if he were expressly authorised by the owner...provided the person taking... (the goods)...acts in good faith, and has not at the time of the disposition notice that the person making the disposition has not the authority to make the same.'

  1. Explain the distinction between the law and morals and consider the importance of the ...

    relationship of civil partnership; it seems here that the Law has actually been proactive in introducing this. The law can be seen to be following morality in the case of R v R. In this case marital rape was ruled illegal and thus the law was changed so that a

  2. Why was the Apprenticeship system brought to an end in 1838 in the British ...

    In St. St. Kitts, the Vagrancy act of 1835 stated that " if an apprentice knowingly spread tales, reports or committed any acts of insubordination and was convicted, he could receive as many as sixty lashes or six months imprisonment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work