• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How satisfactory is the current law of murder?

Extracts from this document...


How satisfactory is the current law of murder? During this essay the law of murder will need to be analysed and assessed in order to answer the question of it's current state. Whilst analysing the law of murder the Actus Reus and the Mens Rea along with any other problems will need to be dealt with. However we need to realise what the law of murder is and how it came into affect. Murder is a special law as it is a common law offence or rather a judge made law. What this means is that the law has been made over the years when cases arise. Due to this the law has been improvised and changed through the years due to the circumstances. Most pieces of legislation are acts of parliament that are produced by the parliament (House of Lords, House of Commons and the Queen), however judges have made this piece of legislation. The law of murder first can be claimed to be unsatisfactory or misleading due to the very fact that it is judge made law. This causes problems, as there are no guidelines to stick to, this led to many different outcomes occurring when sentencing and the law being called overcomplicated. ...read more.


So to find Malice Aforethought or Mens Rea it was stated in R v Vickers (1957) and R v Cunningham (1981) that, intention to cause GBH (grievous bodily harm) is enough to establish the MR of Murder not even to cause the death is necessary. This can cause problems, as it is not fair to accuse people of murder if they did not intend to kill, along with this if they are wrongfully accused they will face life imprisonment. Furthermore the test of 'Foresight of Consequences' allows more people to be sentenced for murder. This test is were the jury put themselves in the defendant's shoes. In R v Woolin the jury had to find the MR for murder if they felt that "At the material time the defendant could foresee as virtually certain that death or serious harm could occur". This can be criticised, as the jury only really need to find if the defendant wanted to cause serious harm, not murder. So the jury are using non-fatal guidelines of intention to cause GBH on a fatal offence. Many people have claimed that this test is to find intent that may not be there however in the case of Matthews & Alleyne (2003) ...read more.


The new proposals can be said is a step towards improvement as now the jury and judge have more options when sentencing. This makes it fairer as juries can now give more guilty verdicts without thinking that the sentence is too harsh and letting them off. However it will be hard to find defendants for first degree murder as the requirement is that they have the intention to kill. Along with this, critics have claimed second degree murder is a ticket to getting a lighter sentence, as the defendant needs to claim they were reckless. In retaliation the Commission said, "Taking a risk even a high risk of killing someone is recklessness and very serious but it is not the same as the deliberate taking of a life." The law of Murder has flaws in it however it is also quite good. The Actus Reus of Murder is fine and could be left to use without reform, as there are not many problems. However regarding the Mens Rea there is constant debate, and it needs to be reformed. As Jeremy Horder said, "the judiciary need to adapt to the 21st century," this could be done if the proposals of the law commission are adopted. The law has been around for over 50 years and will need reform to make it easier to use in the future. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Some good points made, especially on the proposed reforms. Some of the points about the the present law could be more accurately described.
Rating ***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 18/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Common Law and Equity

    5 star(s)

    Another problem with the common law was that it failed to offer satisfactory remedies; they could not give out injunctions and therefore had no way of making a person keep his promise, or stop him from carrying out the act again.

  2. Common Law and Equity Essay

    The judges acted as a "sifting process" where they would return to West minister and discuss the various laws that have been operated around the country. This enabled the judges, over a period of roughly 200 years, to take the best local laws and apply them throughout the land.

  1. Customer Service Legislation

    * A right to 4 weeks' paid leave a year. This can also reflect onto customer service. If an employer does not conform to these rules then their employees will be overworked so this can lead to ineffective customer service, which can ultimately lead to a loss in sales.

  2. Why was the Apprenticeship system brought to an end in 1838 in the British ...

    Also, the cost of living was much higher than in Britain. Death and disease stalked the magistracy. A few days before his death, Magistrate Everard told a colleague in Jamaica that he frequently fell asleep on his horse from sheer fatigue.

  1. Explain the distinction between the law and morals and consider the importance of the ...

    Often it is the possession of effective political powers which finally determines which and whose definition of morality is reflected in the law. Over many years a debate has been growing over whether the law should support morals. There are two ideas that link in to this natural law and positivism.

  2. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    The current situation is that physical inspection may not uncover all overriding interests, as seen in cases such as Pettitt v. Pettitt (1970)32 and William & Glyn's Bank v. Boland (1981)33 it is these 'undiscoverable' minor interests that are a problem in our modern system.

  1. Common Law and Equity

    So equity could order A to perform his contract and sell B the vase. Equity was very flexible, unlike the rigid, formal common law, and it was not bound to the common law so it could grow and expand. Equity could aid and supplement the common law where it was restricted.

  2. 'Delegated legislation is a necessary evil'. How far is this an accurate assessment of ...

    Even though delegated legislation allows bodies and government ministers to make the law, Parliament and the courts still maintain control over delegated legislation. One of the main controls of Parliament lies in the parent or enabling act. This act has to be carefully drafted so that when the power is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work