• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


HOW WOMEN'S RIGHTS HAVE DEVELOPED IN LAW CASE COMMENTARY BARCLAYS BANK V O'BRIEN (1994) Traditionally, society has regarded women as the inferior of the two sexes. It was believed that women should be 'kept' by their husbands, who being the chief bread maker should look after his wife and their finances. Up until recently women were not afforded special rights in equity that are available to them today. The case of Barclays Bank and O'Brien 1994 has been significant in establishing rights for wives who have been unduly influenced by their husbands into risking their property for the debts of their husbands. Lord Browne-Wilkinson's judgement has been subject to much criticism regarding the extent to which wives and near-wives should be protected by the law from their husbands influence. Two schools of thought have emerged from the case; one follows that, no special protection should be afforded to marry women, the second, called the 'special equity theory', considers that special rights should be available to those where the relationship between the debtor (husband), and surety (wife), is such that the surety relies upon the debtor. ...read more.


Therefore, the creditor should take measure to satisfy himself, that the surety has been 'properly obtained'. If the creditor fails to do so he has constructive notice of the wife's rights, and so in equity, the wife can set aside the transaction and her obligations will be un-enforceable. Lord Browne-Wilkinson stated that in order to avoid having constructive notice of the wife's rights, the creditor should advise her to seek independent legal advice. It should also be ensured that the wife understands the risks involved by attending a 'private meeting (in the absence of the husband)'. This suggestion was disputed by Mr Jarvis for the bank, as he stated that it would impose 'too heavy a burden' upon lendors. However this was rejected by his lordship as he held that wives still rely implicitly upon their husbands and recognised that written warnings are 'often not read' and may be intercepted by husbands. Creditors should therefore take measures to ensure that the wife is aware of the potential liability. He regarded this as 'good practice' and not too heavy a burden upon financial institutions. Lord Browne-Wilkinson's judgement also established the need to extend protection to cases where there is an 'emotional relationship between cohabitees'. ...read more.


Although through various studies it is apparent that lending practice is far from the duty imposed in O'Brien to hold personal interviews, most lendors do ensure that a wife enters into a transaction with 'real consent'. To some extent, creditors have adhered to the principles in O'Brien however problems arise where Lord Browne-Wilkinson has failed to define 'reasonable steps'. This leads it open to judgement and causes uncertainty, as there is no specific guideline, and can therefore be disputed in a court of law. Another major failing of His Lordships judgement was recognised by Maggie Conway in her text 'Equity's Darling'. In a survey she discovered that even with 'knowledge of the risks' involved and legal advice partners would find it 'refusal' to 'act as security to their spouse or partner' impossible. The Law unfortunately does not account for emotional black mail which women may be subjected to by their husbands or partners. In retrospect, the case of Barclays Bank and O'Brien and Lord Browne-Wilkinson's' judgement has excelled women's rights significantly compared with those which were available to them prior to the hearing of the case. Although there are various discrepancies between the ideals suggested by His Lordship and actual practice, there has been much appraisal for it in developing women's collective legal rights. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Explain the development of Equity.

    Equity provided a big increase in the number of remedies available to a wronged party, as at common law the only remedy available was monetary compensation, which was not always enough. The four most important remedies include injunction, specific performance, rectification and recission.

  2. Law case study

    drawn up by a solicitor, where he would qualify for legal aid and not incur any added financial costs. Family Law The Family Law (Scotland Act 2006 was introduced to the Scottish Parliament on 7th February 2005, it was given Royal assent in January 2006 and the Act commenced May the 4th 2006.

  1. Care Values and Practice Module

    day or two but the fact the staff have noticed her increasingly unhappiness indicates she was there longer for the staff to make such observations. The staff should have either declared their incompetence to deal with this situation or intensely gathered as much information on Tisha to accommodate her needs,

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    Indeed, the Court has progressively recognised paramountcy of children's rights - Art. 3 UNCRC55 - in accordance with national laws56, most recently in Yousef v. Netherlands57, which the author argues was discriminative, holding that as between unmarried father and child, child's Art.

  1. Assess the likelihood of Sid and Kenny avoiding personal liability for the debts of ...

    The principle established in Salomon v. A. Salomon Co Ltd, that a company is a legal entity entirely separate and distinct from the members of that company, and directors will not incur personal liability for acts done in their capacity as such.

  2. Which was the most significant Reform, 1830-1931, why?

    It also extended the franchise in boroughs to adult male heads of households, and in counties to males who owned, or held on long leases, land worth �5 a year, or who occupied land worth �12 on which they paid poor rates.

  1. A number of views have been expressed that 'marriage' between two heterosexual couples is ...

    merits special protection in society and [the Commission] sees no reason why a [government] should not afford particular assistance to families4. In Roosli v. Germany the Commission merely adopted the same reasoning as that in Simpson. The Commission found no reasoning to depart from Simpson, having regard to the German

  2. Judicial Reform and Bill of Rights.

    This is not the only report that criticises the Lord Chancellor; many different decisions has outraged people in the past, from the media when he suggested imposing bans on probing politicians to even Tony Blair. 1B There are many different ways in which the judicial system could be reformed, even though some of them do pose a number of disadvantages.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work