• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Human rights act

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the "Human Rights Act 1998" Ethical? The Human Rights Act 1998 is a United Kingdom Act of Parliament which received Royal Assent on November 9, 1998, and came into force on October 2, 2000. Its aim is to enforce UK law to the rights enclosed in the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act provides UK courts with a solution for breach of a Convention right, without the need to go to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. It also completely got rid of the death penalty in UK law. This Act makes it unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Law, unless the wording of an Act of Parliament means they have no other choice. It also requires UK judges to take account of decisions of the Strasbourg court, and to interpret legislation, as far as possible, in a way which is compatible with the Convention. Human rights are basic freedoms that all people in democratic countries are entitled to enjoy. ...read more.

Middle

like an individual's action, which in itself is pretty neutral in content and may be for the good of him/herself but may disturb the other person's rights, so it also goes against human rights. For example, an "artist's" rights are for the artist alone, as long as the person is an artist he has those rights, which others have to take into account and comply with fully. Art 2 Sec 1 states that "Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law." And on the other hand abortion is legal. Babies are human beings therefore the law should apply to them as well. Art 5 Sec 1 states "Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person." in conjunction with Art 6 Sec 1 stating "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. These sections of the act were breached on the "Stag Case" where he was unfairly convicted of murdered and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. ...read more.

Conclusion

One should not be judged by someone else's' actions. Hitler was Christian and yet no one mentioned a "war on Christianity". Art 12 states that "Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right." Although Gay marriages have been made legal recently, this section does not protect them or mention them at all which also break the law under article 14 which states that "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status." In conclusion to all the above, I would like to state that The Human Rights Act only protects a certain groups of people that interest the British government. I find the whole act very hypocritical and not well enforced. People should be treated as individuals according to their own circumstances and not as members of a certain group. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Jury Essay

    This is because section eight of the Contempt Of Court Act 1981 states that it is a criminal offence to talk about any matters discussed in private, so therefore no inquiry is allowed to be made into why the jury came upon their decision.

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    Children Act 1989, is said to be a clear discrimination against fathers. Obviously there are fathers who do not deserve parental responsibility, just as there are married fathers and many married and unmarried mothers who do not deserve it. It may be more understandable why married mothers and fathers automatically

  1. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    Lord Goldsmith points out that the Attorney General recently stated that it is up to Parliament if they are to legislate in a manner incompatible with convention rights and that the UK domestic courts must follow the intention of Parliament.

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    20 UNCRC). This approach was emphasised in Johansen v. Norway41, where the Court strongly asserted that child's best interests may outweigh parents' rights42, especially where parents' exercise of Art. 8 rights may harm child's health and development. This has been followed in other cases43; in Botta v.

  1. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    The section 2(1) provides for the direct effect of the Community law in the United Kingdom. However the English courts initially held that section 2(4) contains a rule of interpretation: that Parliament is presumed not to intend to override Community law unless Parliament states clearly and expressly that it intends

  2. Discuss the extent of the states obligations under articles 2 and 3 of the ...

    of the standards of Article 3, D's removal to St Kitts would expose him to a real risk of dying under most distressing circumstances and would thus amount to inhuman treatment in violation of Article 3. In addition to differing interpretations of individual rights, there are also some cases in which different rights appear to conflict.

  1. "Public policy has been slow to treat disability as a matter of equality, human ...

    As is characteristic to all forms of discrimination, whether it be based on class, colour, religion, sexuality, beliefs or any other form of discrimination, although eradication has been long overdue, a step in the direction has only recently been taken.

  2. 'The Human Rights Act 1998 has a significant impact on

    The key issue for discussion is that although, citizens of the UK are able to challenge public bodies for infringements of their human rights stringent limitations are imposed on the public's power to exercise their rights in judicial review proceedings.5 Limitations include for example, time restrictions by which claims must

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work