• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Human rights act

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the "Human Rights Act 1998" Ethical? The Human Rights Act 1998 is a United Kingdom Act of Parliament which received Royal Assent on November 9, 1998, and came into force on October 2, 2000. Its aim is to enforce UK law to the rights enclosed in the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act provides UK courts with a solution for breach of a Convention right, without the need to go to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. It also completely got rid of the death penalty in UK law. This Act makes it unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Law, unless the wording of an Act of Parliament means they have no other choice. It also requires UK judges to take account of decisions of the Strasbourg court, and to interpret legislation, as far as possible, in a way which is compatible with the Convention. Human rights are basic freedoms that all people in democratic countries are entitled to enjoy. ...read more.

Middle

like an individual's action, which in itself is pretty neutral in content and may be for the good of him/herself but may disturb the other person's rights, so it also goes against human rights. For example, an "artist's" rights are for the artist alone, as long as the person is an artist he has those rights, which others have to take into account and comply with fully. Art 2 Sec 1 states that "Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law." And on the other hand abortion is legal. Babies are human beings therefore the law should apply to them as well. Art 5 Sec 1 states "Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person." in conjunction with Art 6 Sec 1 stating "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. These sections of the act were breached on the "Stag Case" where he was unfairly convicted of murdered and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. ...read more.

Conclusion

One should not be judged by someone else's' actions. Hitler was Christian and yet no one mentioned a "war on Christianity". Art 12 states that "Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right." Although Gay marriages have been made legal recently, this section does not protect them or mention them at all which also break the law under article 14 which states that "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status." In conclusion to all the above, I would like to state that The Human Rights Act only protects a certain groups of people that interest the British government. I find the whole act very hypocritical and not well enforced. People should be treated as individuals according to their own circumstances and not as members of a certain group. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Jury Essay

    This is because section eight of the Contempt Of Court Act 1981 states that it is a criminal offence to talk about any matters discussed in private, so therefore no inquiry is allowed to be made into why the jury came upon their decision.

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    In response to a government paper on the situation, Families Need Fathers State: 'it is no longer reasonable to maintain any distinction between the legal position of married and unmarried fathers in relation to their children."34 It is reasonable to suggest that the law on fathers' rights is outdated.

  1. 'The Human Rights Act 1998 has a significant impact on

    Under Act 1981 section 31(6), the court may refuse to grant leave for an application or may refuse to grant relief sought by the claimant if it considers that granting of the relief 'would be likely to cause substantial hardship to, or substantially prejudice the rights of, any person or

  2. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    Although under section 3 (1) it states that all primary and subordinate legislation "so far as possible to do so...must be read and given effect in a away compatible with the Convention rights."17 This is not the only view.

  1. unit6 end of unit assignment civil litigation

    can be enforced by a warrant of possession which commands the county court bailiffs to enter upon the land, evict those in unlawful possession and give possession to the claimant. * Committal for contempt of court where the judgment is an injunction ordering the defendant to do or refrain from

  2. Can the Islamic approach to Human Rights be compatible withthe current International Human Rights ...

    given whilst some of Mohammad's wives asked him why the Qur'an only addressed itself to men, and some of the other believing women asked whether the verses about the wives were for them alone or for all women, as follows: "For Muslim men and women - for believing men and

  1. Describe and evaluate the impact of the children's rights perspective on social policy for ...

    as adults, while identifying at the same time they are vulnerable because of their age and are subject to the decisions and behaviour of adults. The rights set out in the Convention can be grouped into three broad categories; Protection: children have a right to protection from cruelty, abuse, neglect and exploitation.

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    Nielsen v. Denmark26 was a landmark case, which decided that a child's right to liberty was not infringed by mother's absolute custody and his placement in child ward27 without hearing the child. The surprisingly authoritarian decision for late 1980's, which Fortin believes again illuminated Convention's ill-equipment for children's rights and Court's inability

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work