• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Human rights act

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the "Human Rights Act 1998" Ethical? The Human Rights Act 1998 is a United Kingdom Act of Parliament which received Royal Assent on November 9, 1998, and came into force on October 2, 2000. Its aim is to enforce UK law to the rights enclosed in the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act provides UK courts with a solution for breach of a Convention right, without the need to go to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. It also completely got rid of the death penalty in UK law. This Act makes it unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Law, unless the wording of an Act of Parliament means they have no other choice. It also requires UK judges to take account of decisions of the Strasbourg court, and to interpret legislation, as far as possible, in a way which is compatible with the Convention. Human rights are basic freedoms that all people in democratic countries are entitled to enjoy. ...read more.

Middle

like an individual's action, which in itself is pretty neutral in content and may be for the good of him/herself but may disturb the other person's rights, so it also goes against human rights. For example, an "artist's" rights are for the artist alone, as long as the person is an artist he has those rights, which others have to take into account and comply with fully. Art 2 Sec 1 states that "Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law." And on the other hand abortion is legal. Babies are human beings therefore the law should apply to them as well. Art 5 Sec 1 states "Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person." in conjunction with Art 6 Sec 1 stating "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. These sections of the act were breached on the "Stag Case" where he was unfairly convicted of murdered and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. ...read more.

Conclusion

One should not be judged by someone else's' actions. Hitler was Christian and yet no one mentioned a "war on Christianity". Art 12 states that "Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right." Although Gay marriages have been made legal recently, this section does not protect them or mention them at all which also break the law under article 14 which states that "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status." In conclusion to all the above, I would like to state that The Human Rights Act only protects a certain groups of people that interest the British government. I find the whole act very hypocritical and not well enforced. People should be treated as individuals according to their own circumstances and not as members of a certain group. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Jury Essay

    This is because section eight of the Contempt Of Court Act 1981 states that it is a criminal offence to talk about any matters discussed in private, so therefore no inquiry is allowed to be made into why the jury came upon their decision.

  2. EU law and Human Rights

    The various Acts of Parliaments, case laws and Statutes merely state what the citizens are NOT allowed to do rather then what they can. Thus, the citizens of UK have what is called residual liberties5 that are not to be found entrenched in any legislation.

  1. Can the Islamic approach to Human Rights be compatible withthe current International Human Rights ...

    rights, by stating that "..., in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom," (www.un.org). Yet, all articles except article sixteen do not distinguish people on the basis of gender, male and female.

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    Children Act 1989, is said to be a clear discrimination against fathers. Obviously there are fathers who do not deserve parental responsibility, just as there are married fathers and many married and unmarried mothers who do not deserve it. It may be more understandable why married mothers and fathers automatically

  1. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    Lord Goldsmith points out that the Attorney General recently stated that it is up to Parliament if they are to legislate in a manner incompatible with convention rights and that the UK domestic courts must follow the intention of Parliament.

  2. "Public policy has been slow to treat disability as a matter of equality, human ...

    Independence, an objective of this Act, can be interpreted in accordance with those who use the term. Governments see independence as being financial independence, and individuals not being dependent upon the Welfare State. The professional sector sees independence as the ability to undertake on full range of self care activities.

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    Denmark33, however, the Court decided that parents' Art. 8 rights were not infringed by Danish welfare authorities refusing to force 14-year-old girl to return home against her will, which seemingly protected child's right to own private life. The apparently inconsistent approach to child's Art. 8 rights in these contrasting cases is effectively explained by need to protect the

  2. Torts project - Payment of Compensation in Hit and Run Motor Accident.

    in respect of death to a third party, caused by or arising out of the use of a vehicle in a public place. During the material time, the vehicle was not 'in use' much less in a public place. As the accident did not occur when the vehicle was in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work