• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Human rights act

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the "Human Rights Act 1998" Ethical? The Human Rights Act 1998 is a United Kingdom Act of Parliament which received Royal Assent on November 9, 1998, and came into force on October 2, 2000. Its aim is to enforce UK law to the rights enclosed in the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act provides UK courts with a solution for breach of a Convention right, without the need to go to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. It also completely got rid of the death penalty in UK law. This Act makes it unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Law, unless the wording of an Act of Parliament means they have no other choice. It also requires UK judges to take account of decisions of the Strasbourg court, and to interpret legislation, as far as possible, in a way which is compatible with the Convention. Human rights are basic freedoms that all people in democratic countries are entitled to enjoy. ...read more.

Middle

like an individual's action, which in itself is pretty neutral in content and may be for the good of him/herself but may disturb the other person's rights, so it also goes against human rights. For example, an "artist's" rights are for the artist alone, as long as the person is an artist he has those rights, which others have to take into account and comply with fully. Art 2 Sec 1 states that "Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law." And on the other hand abortion is legal. Babies are human beings therefore the law should apply to them as well. Art 5 Sec 1 states "Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person." in conjunction with Art 6 Sec 1 stating "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. These sections of the act were breached on the "Stag Case" where he was unfairly convicted of murdered and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. ...read more.

Conclusion

One should not be judged by someone else's' actions. Hitler was Christian and yet no one mentioned a "war on Christianity". Art 12 states that "Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right." Although Gay marriages have been made legal recently, this section does not protect them or mention them at all which also break the law under article 14 which states that "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status." In conclusion to all the above, I would like to state that The Human Rights Act only protects a certain groups of people that interest the British government. I find the whole act very hypocritical and not well enforced. People should be treated as individuals according to their own circumstances and not as members of a certain group. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Jury Essay

    This is because section eight of the Contempt Of Court Act 1981 states that it is a criminal offence to talk about any matters discussed in private, so therefore no inquiry is allowed to be made into why the jury came upon their decision.

  2. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    Although under section 3 (1) it states that all primary and subordinate legislation "so far as possible to do so...must be read and given effect in a away compatible with the Convention rights."17 This is not the only view.

  1. unit6 end of unit assignment civil litigation

    An affidavit (sworn statement) is required setting out the judgment debtor's interest in the property and the fitness of the proposed receiver. The receiver will receive the money when it becomes payable and prevent it getting into the hands of the judgment debtor * Bankruptcy and liquidation where the judgment

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    But, the Government took the view that unmarried couples should not be permitted to adopt. However the amendment was accepted later, permitting unmarried couples to adopt. The Adoption and Children Act 2002, provides that an unmarried father whose name is entered on the birth certificate by joint registration or joint re-registration will automatically get parental responsibility for his child.

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    decide for him, which implies that it would not be so had he been older29. The case leaves us wandering what this age of autonomy should be. It may also explain why in A v. UK, heard about 10 years after Nielsen and UNCRC, the Court would not itself abolish

  2. Can the Islamic approach to Human Rights be compatible withthe current International Human Rights ...

    routinely subject to torture, starvation, terrorism, humiliation, mutilation, and even murder simply because they are female. Crimes such as these against any group other than women would be recognised as a civil and political emergency as well as a gross violation of the victims' humanity."

  1. Are the Human Rights Act 1998 and the doctrine of Parliamentary supremacy compatible?

    It is C. A. Gearty's belief that with the enactment of the Human Rights Act, Parliament intended to retain their supremacy.6 Which of course makes sense as there is no logical reason why Parliament would knowingly do away with such a valuable power. Through the reading of the Human Rights Act 1998, evidence to

  2. The European Convention of Human Rights

    Section 2 states that during court hearings, if a convention right becomes an issue then the court must consider past judgements by The European Court of Human Rights or opinions of The European Commission for Human Rights. Even though judges are not bound by these decisions they may use them as a guideline.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work