• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ian, an investment broker, wasapproached by Victor who asked him whether he should invest in WonderElectronics Ltd. Ian said " You certainly should, Lord Wellybob is a director.It is a very sound company. It is my view that it will go from strength...

Extracts from this document...


Ian, an investment broker, was approached by Victor who asked him whether he should invest in Wonder Electronics Ltd. Ian said " You certainly should, Lord Wellybob is a director. It is a very sound company. It is my view that it will go from strength to strength. In fact, I own 5,000 shares myself which I can let you have.' Victor then bought the shares for �10,000 . The company went into liquidation a month later. The shares are now worthless. It now turns out (a) that Lord Wellybob resigned from his directorship a week after Ian's statement was made. (b) that Ian's statement regarding the prospects of the company was based on a report in a financial journal which was intended to refer to Wonder Electronics Ltd but gave the name of Wander Electronics by a printing error. Advise Victor; SUGGESTED ANSWER: In advising Victor it has to be determined whether he can sue Ian for misrepresentation on breach of terms of contract. Victor will first be advised whether he can sue for misrepresentation. Misrepresentation has not been defined as a statement of fact which is untrue and which induces the other to enter into the contract. ...read more.


And in consequence Ian would be liable for the misrepresentation. Next, one would advice Victor as to the nature of the misrepresentation in order to determine the available remedies. There are 3 types of misrepresentation: i) Fraudulent misrepresentation ii) Negligent misrepresentation iii) Innocent misrepresentation Fraud was defined by Lord Herschell in Derry v Peek as meaning that the representor made the false representation: i) knowingly or ii) without belief in its truth or iv) recklessly, careless whether it be true or false. Since Ian made the statements recklessly, knowing that Victor was relying on his expertise. But the burden of proof is on Victor and standard is very high, it requires evidence to allege fraud against Ian because the error in company name is as a result of printing error, be such it is not advisable for Victor to allege fraudulent misrepresentation. Furthermore the remedies for negligence under S2(1) M.A 1967 is more than the tortuous measure (out of packet rule) ie to put P into a position he would have been in had the representation been true. Watt v Spence, Roycot trust v Rogerson (1991) As to Negligence , it is defined as a false statement made honestly by a person who had no reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true ie failure to take reasonable care to ensure that the representation is accurate. ...read more.


If Victor wishes to sue for fraudulent misrepresentation (which is not advised to) he can either affirm the contract and claim damages for the tort of deceit or rescind the contract and claim damages or plead fraud as defense in an action against him for breach of contract. In cases of fraudulent inducement it has given exemption of remoteness test Doyle v Olby (lronongers Ltd), East v Nlourer (1991) but not in tort. Advise to Victor could not be complete if he is not advised whether he can sue Ian for breach of terms of contract. Victor has to prove that the 3 statement made by Ian are term of the contract and not mere representation. The courts have formulated the following guideline for this : i) time lapse between representation and conclusion of the contract . Routledge v Mekay (1954) ii) was the oral statement followed by a written contract Birch v Paramount Estates iii) Did the representor have special knowledge or skill Dick Bentley Production v Harold Smith (1965) iv) Important of the statement Bannerman v White The representation may also be treated as collateral contract, Evans and Sons Ltd v Andrea Mezarao . The act may regards Ian's statement as mere representations and therefore it's advisable for Victor to sue for misrepresentation, further by virtue of S1(a) M.A 1967 Victor can cue for misrepresentation even though the representation is a term of the contract. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    The acceptance is a counter-offer that offeror may accept or reject. He may accept by receiving the goods or services. Thus contract base on the counter-offer formed. 2) Offeror and offeree both purport to contract with reference to his own terms(which may conflict)17 B.R.S.

  2. unit3 law of tort

    And it can also be seen that Ken was aware of toxilcear lorries on his land as he was notified but he chose to take no action this may be due to the fact that the land was not in use, therefore , Ken neglected his duty to his own land and intern caused material damage to Leonard's land.

  1. Void and voidable Contracts.

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the finding of negligence. On the issue Lord Denning stated: '... it was a forecast made by a party, Esso, who had special knowledge and skill. They knew the facts. They had much experience and expertise at their disposal.


    Answer 4. The charterers were not entitled to do so. Diplock LJ "The question to be asked was did the delay deprive the charterers of substantially the whole benefit which it was the intention of the parties they should obtain from further use of the vessel under the charterparty."

  1. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    Camilla seems to have made an improper threat to break the contract and Ildar may have found it impossible to find someone else to supply the plants at such short notice (three days). And of course it would have been a big blow for Ildar to loose a customer such


    The victim is the innocent party and can approach courts and request a remedy. A remedy for a breach should hopefully be capable of putting the victim in the position he would have been should the breach not taken place.

  1. The theory of tenure requires that all land that is held for any estate ...

    This has shown that land was held for a variety of services. But whatever the nature of the services, all tenants had one thing in common, namely that they held land of a superior lord. Tenure connotes not merely the holding of land but also the holding of land from

  2. Discuss the role of hardship clauses in controlling liability by contract.

    relationship has not broken down irretrievably.8 In the absence of a hardship clause, it will be rare for a party to overcome hardship arising from change of circumstances by invoking the doctrine of frustration. In any event, frustration results in termination of the contract and releases the parties from their obligations under the contract.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work