• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Identify and comment on the advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives compared to a claim through the civil courts.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1(b) Identify and comment on the advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives compared to a claim through the civil courts. Many have argued that the Civil Courts of the U.K. are not an efficient means of implementing justice, therefore, there are Alternative Dispute Resolutions. Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration and Tribunals are all options that can be chosen instead of Civil Courts, and they are chosen for a number of reasons. The Civil Courts are avoided by some people because of the delays involved with cases in the County Court averaging 20 months whereas, cases in the High Court average up to 3-4 years. This is a big difference compared to the matter of months needed to finalise a well-run arbitration and also to the swift completion of the Mediation, Conciliation and Tribunals. The fast-track scheme has been developed to tackle this problem, it allows for claims of under �15000 to have a hearing within 30 weeks making it noticeably quicker. Perhaps the biggest flaw of the Civil Courts is the cost involved, whereby sometimes the costs may actually exceed that of the damages/claim amount awarded and the total cost for both sides' averages at around 75% of the total compensation in the High Court. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the Arbitrators are allowed to get advice from the Courts on any point of law which they are not certain about, however, the QB divisional court has the power to intervene if the arbitrator acts ultra vires (beyond their power). Many independent Mediators and Mediation services report that in more than four out of five cases, the parties are able to settle all issues in dispute to their mutual satisfaction. As compared to court, where the losing party is almost always angry, this can be considered a success. Unlike the courts, it is very informal, this could be seen as part of the reason why it so successful. People feel more comfortable in the environment as they have less pressure on them, which makes it easier for the two in dispute to discuss matters properly. In Court, they are pushed into a win-lose situation and for normal people, the procedures may seem quite complex, making Courts, on the whole, a very daunting place to speak in. However, there are several reasons why the Court system is still needed, not least because the Courts are seen as a sign of authority and to abandon them would give people the wrong idea. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, a person dissatisfied with the purchase of a home computer may find himself seated across the table from the computer store's district manager, who not only knows more about computers, but has also been trained extensively in negotiating techniques. This makes it hard for the weaker party to put across their argument, leaving them vulnerable, whereas in Court a Barrister or Solicitor could represent them. When it comes to Tribunals, there is an unfair imbalance between parties that are represented and those that are not. It is unfair to people who are not represented and cannot get legal aid to come up against a rich corporation. Since richer parties are allowed to employ skilled representation they are consequently more likely to win. Clearly, there are advantages and disadvantages to all of the dispute resolutions including the Civil Courts and so it would be impractical to have some without the others. The ADR's provide cheap and fast options to the Civil Courts, however, it could be argued that disputes are not always fully resolved and that many of the disputes that are resolved are not done so fairly. Hence, it shows that the Court provides a more stable and rewarding sense of justice that cannot be exploited as much as the ADR's can be. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is the name given to the process where parties in ...

    5 star(s)

    claims and encouragement of a culture of openness between the parties by having earlier and fuller exchange of information to facilitate pre-action investigation and to encourage early settlement. However pre action protocols have also resulted in the front loading of costs.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Describing the Rules and Aids to Statute interpretation. Including Advantages and Disadvantages.

    4 star(s)

    or if the result would lead to an absurdity, the statements relied on are clear etc. As well as; other statutes dealing with the same subject matter, official reports like a Royal Commission or Law Commissions etc that may have preceded the Act and practice- the decisions in another similar case can be a guide to interpretation.

  1. The Civil Justice System Describe the main Civil Courts and their jurisdiction.

    These are the Small Claims procedure, Fast Track and Multi Track systems. The Small Claims procedure is designed to be relatively cheap, simple and fast. Claims under £5000 (£1000 for personal injury) are heard using the Small Claims procedure and the claimant and defendant are encouraged to represent themselves to lower costs.

  2. Disputes - Is ADR always more appropriate or does attending court sometimes providing a ...

    Person-centered- Parties are the centered. Act-centered- Law is the centered. Relationship-oriented- Parties expect relationship can be kept. Fact-oriented- Parties expect to find out the fact to prove who is right Future focused- Parties want their relationship can be to kept in future Past focused- Parties concern who was right.

  1. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    The fact of the matter is that Justice Roberts, whether intentionally or not, is being na�ve about the role that the court really performs. Dworkin has already shown us how the constitution is not interpreted per se but rather the moral principles embodied in it are re-examined.

  2. Describe how civil disputes can be resolved without going to court (this does not ...

    it into many of their contracts as an Scott v Avery Clause. It means that by which if the parties in the contract agree that if they have any dispute in relation to the contract, they will go to either conciliation or arbitration (which is explained in the next paragraph.

  1. Explain and comment on the main reforms made to the civil justice system after ...

    However, after set backs caused by the new Labour government, it was not until April 1999 that the proposals within the Woolf report were fully implemented. The 'main reform' made, as a result of the Woolf report, was the three track system; small claims track, fast track and multi track.

  2. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    o They must register with police. Suspended Prison Sentence o Adult may get suspended prison sentence, up to 2 yrs, 6 mths in Mags. o If no re offends then sentence is not served, if re offends then added to new sentence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work