• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

If you were a suspect being questioned in a police station, which of your rights would you exercise and which would you waive? Which of your rights would you regard as the most important? Why?

Extracts from this document...


If you were a suspect being questioned in a police station, which of your rights would you exercise and which would you waive? Which of your rights would you regard as the most important? Why? For many suspects the process of questioning in a police station is very stressful with 60%1 confessing or making damaging admissions. The ability to take advantage of the right to silence and right to see a solicitor in theory should help to alleviate some of this stress and consequently prevent false confessions which may constitute towards the 60% of confessions. However, in practise the evidence appears to show otherwise. The right to see a solicitor has been practised more adequately recently with more people actually getting advice from a lawyer rather than a clerk. The right to silence has been adopted in a harsh manner, failing to protect innocent suspect. This bring me onto the second question of which right I would use if I was a suspect. This depends on whether I am a guilty or innocent of the charges in question. Furthermore, if I was guilty I would be more inclined to use the right to silence whereas if I was innocent I would be less inclined to use it since the courts are able to infer guilt from silence. ...read more.


Lengthy detention, particularly overnight, is the most feared consequence of arrest for most suspects4. Furthermore, it could lead to false confessions in order to avoid a lengthy stay. For these reasons if I was an innocent victim I would not use my right to silence but instead cooperate since the risks are too much. Although it is indisputable that the right of silence is an important right which should be retained in order not breech the European Convention of Human Rights, it is not the most important right. Its existence hinders extensive and effective interviewing since they are unable to obtain any answers from one who remains silent5. As previously explained it also benefits more experienced criminals who may be guilty, rather than vulnerable innocent ones. There are now also proper safeguards in the form of tape recording making the need for the right to silence less. A more important right is that of access to a solicitor. This right is one which would be beneficial whether I am guilty or innocent of the crime that I am suspected of. Under section 58 of Police and Criminal Evidence Act a solicitor Is supposed to make sure police stick to the rules, give legal advice and make sure due process is adhered too. ...read more.


Furthermore, this makes it even more guaranteed that he will receive a lawyer. In conclusion, rights are very important to suspects since the questioning process can be very stressful and can lead to them sometimes even believing that they are actually guilty8. The right of silence is not as important as the right to a solicitor. Although the right to silence "lies at the heart" of Article 6 (the right to a fair trial) of the European Convention of Human Rights, it is not an absolute right9 and could be retracted. Unfortunately the right of silence can not be adopted without the inevitable consequence of the court being able to infer guilt upon the individual in question. For this reason it is not the most important right and would not be advisable for an individual to use. Nevertheless, if the suspect is guilty of the crime in question he may be able to take advantage of this provision to stop himself from making any damaging admissions. Furthermore, this further adds weight to the argument that the right of access to a solicitor is more important than the right to silence. The right to a solicitor is more likely to help a defendant since it is highly probable that a qualified solicitor will be obtained which would help to prevent any false confessions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    But when the charge is murder, rape or manslaughter and the accused has a previous conviction for such an offence s.25 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA) states that bail should not be granted. Similarly, the presumption in favour of bail is reversed where someone is

  2. Describe with the aid of examples, the authorities, representative bodies or persons that exercise ...

    'Voluntary winding up' is initiated by a general meeting of the members of the company passing a resolution that the company shall be wound up. Our Companies Act distinguishes between a members' and a creditors' winding up. * A members' voluntary winding up occurs when the directors of the company

  1. Why do young people join gangs and other subcultures? How does a criminal sub ...

    * Obligation the gang appeals to a person's sense of community. * Coercion the gang uses physical and psychological intimidation. The youths who join gangs do so for a variety of reasons. Common motives include: * Camaraderie. * A sense of belonging.

  2. As the juvenile courts converge procedurally and substantively with the adult criminal courts, does ...

    it's decreasing, legislators still feel pressure to get even "tougher" on crime. Such "criminal justice" has resulted in the decreasing juvenile offenders caught within this vice between what is and what appears to be to, in fact, be more severely impacted as a group (Finley 1).

  1. Why do a high proportion of suspects not receive legal advice at the police ...

    Since PACE has been in place research studies have shown a significant increase in request levels for legal advice. Around a quarter of suspects requested legal advice in Brown's 1989 study. However, with legal advice at the police station being paid for by the government it is concerning that so

  2. Individuals have civil rights; people are entitled to be allowed to move freely and ...

    If the search is in public, the police can only request that the suspect removes his or her outer coat, jacket and gloves. The code of practice A contains details and guidance on when these powers should be used. In particular it stresses that police officers must not act just because of a person's characteristics.

  1. It is More Important to Acquit the Innocent Than To Convict the Guilty

    Stefan Kiszko was impotent, therefore it would have been impossible for him to commit the crime - the police knew this. He was eventually released as his innocence had been proved. However, this man�s life was destroyed because of a flaw in our criminal justice system.

  2. Explain the requirements of lawful arrest and detention

    Right to silence Advantage ? This right help detained people from getting into more problems. Some time you may be at the wrong place and the wrong time and the police suspect you being involved in the crime. Disadvantage ? Police will be more suspicious of them because if they

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work