• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Illustrate the ways in which different sentences may be used to support different aims of sentencing.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Illustrate the ways in which different sentences may be used to support different aims of sentencing. Introduction There are many sentences available which judges can give in both the Magistrates Court and the Crown Court. These various options mean that they can specifically support a particular aim of sentencing, in this essay I will examine how the different types of sentencing is used to support an aim of sentencing. For example a lengthy custodial sentence will be given to an offender who the court feels needs retribution or an offender will be given a community service order if the court feels the person needs to repay society in some way. Custodial Sentences Custodial sentences can be given to support a number of things, firstly, the obvious aim of sentencing it looks to support is retribution, the idea that an offender must simply be punished for the crime that he has committed. However a custodial sentence must only be given if the court feels a community service order or a fine is not a strict enough punishment. ...read more.

Middle

Fines Fines are a less serious way of dealing with criminal offences than custodial sentences. Fines help with many aims of sentencing. Firstly, they act as retribution because the offender must pay an amount of money for the crime they have committed. This leads onto the fact that it also may help with reformation because once a person has paid the fine they see that committing an offence will lead to punishment and also would lead to a more serious fine or even a custodial sentence if the person repeats the crime again. A problem with fines is the numbers which go unpaid. The not paying of fines has two negative effects. Firstly the punishment becomes completely ineffective as the offender has completely ignored it or has no means of paying it and secondly it leads to an imprisonment for non payment of a fine. The Courts Act 2003 introduced a discharge of fines by unpaid work to solve this problem meaning that people with financial problems or with no way of paying the fine can work it off by doing community work. ...read more.

Conclusion

This type of sentence is intended to be used where punishment does not seem necessary and if an offender reoffends in the set time period the court can impose an additional sentence upon the offender as well as charging them for the new offence. Conclusion: To summarize my essay I would say that the current types of sentencing excellently deal with the aims of sentencing although there are some criticisms of these. An example of some of the criticisms of the types of sentencing and how they achieve these aims is that with custodial sentences, it is likely that the person would have been either under the influence of drugs or alcohol when committing the offence so they may not be deterred by the custodial sentence given. Another criticism is that repeat offenders will have previously experienced sentences and it would waste money to attempt to reform them when they have shown no clear means of any reformation in any previous sentences. However even though there are these criticisms I feel that these only represent a minority of offenders sentenced, and that the majority of sentences given to reach the aims they are intended to. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Using Cases to illustrate your points critically, decribe the Homocide Act 1957 and include ...

    Woolin stated that the jury are not entitled to "find" the necessary intention unless it was virtually certain that death or serious bodily harm would occur from D's action.

  2. Pros and cons of custodial and community sentences.

    Also prison conditions are poor and therefore there have been many cases of suicide over the last decade.

  1. Describe the aims of sentencing and other factors that should be taken into account ...

    The only problem is that the tariff system involves having fixed sums, and takes no financial situation of the offender. Therefore it is inevitable that a rich offender would be negligible paying a high fine e.g. �500, where as a poor individual may find it difficult.

  2. The Crown Procecution Service

    making is shown to be more wrong than right with prosecutions of more serious offences being discontinued as compared to less serious cases. This clearly shows CPS is not doing its job well. Also there are frequent complaints by both judges and magistrates of delay and inefficiency in case preparation by the CPS.

  1. The justifiable use of force in self-defence depends entirely upon the circumstances in which ...

    He illustrated that the test is mainly objective with a subjective twist and that reasonableness is extremely necessary. A key case in deciding whether the defendant used reasonable force is Martin (2002). The defendant lived alone on a farm and shot two men who had broken in after he had been plagued y burglars for years.

  2. Looking at the offences of Assault, Battery, Actual bodily harm and Grievous really serious ...

    This offence requires that there must be more than bruising, minor fractures and/or nosebleeds. Under section 47 of the Offences against the person Act 1861 it states that; Whosoever shall be convicted upon an indictment of any assault occasioning actual bodily harm shall be liable... to imprisonment for five years.

  1. provocation essay

    On the other hand the loss of self control does not have to be immediate but sudden so he might have suddenly 'lost it' seeing her there. This is a question for the jury. Even if they decide there was a sudden loss of self control Carl will also have to satisfy the objective test of provocation.

  2. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    There is also a possible differential approach to the same questions by different social groups, as different words mean different things to different groups; for example, the understanding of what constitutes a ?gang? would differ between middle class and working class groups.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work