• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In English law, a person will not be found to be criminally liable merely because he failed to act. 'It is not a crime to cause death or bodily injury, even intentionally, by any omission'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sunny Bhanot 16H 28th October 2002. Law Essay - OMISSIONS In English law, a person will not be found to be criminally liable merely because he failed to act. 'It is not a crime to cause death or bodily injury, even intentionally, by any omission'. (Stephen LJ - nineteenth century). The example that Stephen LJ used was where a person sees another man drowning but does nothing to help him, even though, if he had merely reached out his hand, the man who could not swim would have been saved, under English Law the person failing to act has committed no crime. There are limited exceptions to this rule, as where; * statue imposes liability (e.g. Road Traffic Act 1988) * a contract of employment (Pittwood 1902) * a public duty (Dytham 1979) * where there is a special relationship between the parties (Instan 1893, Gibbins and Proctor 1918) * where one party voluntarily accepts liability (Stone and Dobinson 1977) * Or where there is a dangerous situation that the person creating the danger fails to put right (Miller 1983). ...read more.

Middle

(ii) Where there is a special relationship between the parties; a party can be found guilty if he fails to do a duty imposed upon him by a virtue of a special relationship between him and the victim. An early case on this subject was Instan 1893, where a niece failed to obtain help for her, with whom she was living, the aunt contracted gangrene in her leg and died. The niece's conviction for manslaughter was upheld. Another case illustrating this is Gibbins and Proctor 1918, where a man and his common law wife were found guilty of homicide, after failing to feed the man's child, and she later died of starvation. The father had the duty to look after his child, and the woman even though it was not her child was held liable because she lived with the man and accepted his money for food. In Khan 1998, however, it was decided that drug dealers are not under any special duty to look after their clients and as a result a manslaughter conviction was quashed. ...read more.

Conclusion

To impose liability, therefore, the idea of a continuing act was used. The defendant had been told to stop his car and pull into the curb. As he did so he accidentally drove onto the policeman's foot. When he was shouted at to remove the car, the defendant swore at the policeman, told him he could wait and switched of the ignition. He was convicted of assaulting a police constable in the execution of his duty, but later appealed stating that no liability could be incurred by merely failing to act. The Court of Appeal held differently. The judges decided that driving onto the policeman's foot and then keeping the car there was one continuous act, not an act followed by an omission. Fagan's conviction was therefore upheld. I feel that the current principles governing liability for omissions are satisfactory and feel that there are enough exceptions for people not to be allowed to get away with criminal acts by using an omission as their defence. I feel it is satisfactory in the sense that those who are in the situation of seeing for example an assault case are too afraid or weak to intervene and help should not be held liable due to their incapability to physically help. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    But the courts have often relied on mechanisms of minimising the legal importance of the order, to reassure the mother, that her position will not be undermined. As Ward LJ put it in Re S25: " It is wrong to place undue and therefore false emphasis on the rights and

  2. Critically evaluate the partial defence of Provocation.

    since the previous to take this evidence into account was the principal ground for ordering a retrial. In the retrial of R v Humphreys (1995) a psychiatric report was not taken into account as a characteristic for the 'reasonable man' because the judge told the jury to exclude it.

  1. Torts project - Payment of Compensation in Hit and Run Motor Accident.

    if compensation has already been paid under Section 161, direct the person liable to pay the compensation awarded by it to refund to the insurer, so much thereof as is required to be refunded in according with the provision of sub-section 91); (b)

  2. In English

    However, the Court of Appeal also held in the case of R v Leonard Cheshire Foundation, that a charitable trust providing residential care to people with disabilities on behalf of local authorities was not carrying out public functions and therefore not caught by section 6 (3) (b) of the Act.

  1. Health Care Ethics and Law

    Sexual offences act 1993 10. Education act 1993 11. Criminal justice and public order act 1994 In general people with learning disabilities are treated the same as other people in law. People with learning disabilities who are competent have the right to make their own decisions in just the same way as anyone else.

  2. Investigate The Employment Of People With Disabilities

    Epileptic seizures differ with the type of condition and may consist of loss of consciousness, convulsive jerking of parts of the body, emotional explosions, or periods of mental confusion. Studies show that although epilepsy is not inherited, predisposition to the disorder is a hereditary trait responsible for some of the idiopathic cases.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work