• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In relation to murder (including voluntary manslaughter), consider the suggestion that the current law is unsatisfactory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In relation to murder (including voluntary manslaughter), consider the suggestion that the current law is unsatisfactory. In the proposals published in December 2005, the Law Commission says that the law governing homicide in England and Wales is a 'rickety structure set upon shaky foundations' and propose that for the first time, the general law of homicide be rationalized through legislation. The AR of murder being the unlawful killing of a human being can be unclear as there is no definition of death, nor a ruling as to exactly when it takes place, modern life support technology (life support machine) can make death a gray area whereas in the past they would have died. This was the case in Malchrek and Steele where the court decided obiter that death meant brain dead. This is not considered a problem as the rule of causation can be used to establish liability. CLR agreed that it's better not to have a strict definition of death. ...read more.

Middle

The LC said a person acts intentionally with respect to a result when, it is his purpose to cause it or although it is not his purpose to cause it, he knows that it would occur in the ordinary course of events if he was to succeed in his purpose of causing some other result. This can lead to confusion in a jury and lead to inconsistent verdicts. The LC proposes the D should have intention where s/he knows that the result would occur in the ordinary course of events. Murder carries a mandatory life sentence, which is where the judge has no choice but to impose this sentence. This means aggravating and mitigating factors can't be taken into account. The judge can't discriminate between different types of murder e.g. Cocker- who acted out of mercy. The HA 1957 had to create a partial defence to murder to give the judge some sentencing discretion in some situations. ...read more.

Conclusion

In Duffy it was said that the loss of temper must be sudden and temporary. This defence is seen as one that favors men as women in cases like Ahluwalia and Thornton act out of fear but don't have the defence of provocation. A sudden reform would be to remove the need for a sudden and temporary loss of control and simply return to a loss of control taking all the relevant factors into consideration. A new defence may be created called 'self preservation' that would take into account the way women react. In Holley the PC ruled that the jury should expect the level of control of an ordinary person of D's age and sex. Personal characteristics are only taken into account in deciding the gravity of the provocation. The LC proposes that the objective test should be based on a person of D's age and temperament. This supports the PC decision in Holley. If all the LC reforms were implemented, the criticisms would be addressed and the law on homicide will be improved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    So this brings me back to my earlier point - if parliament wont spend the time to change the law on murder to something which is a more reasonable sentence, then why cant it be change in cases, like it always has been?

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Reform of the law on murder.The law commission say it is rickety structure set ...

    3 star(s)

    However, this isn't clear as to what is legally right as technically it can be seen as legal by both ways. If you follow the thin skull rule, then the defendant must take the victim as he finds them and therefore it doesn't matter if they wish to seek medical

  1. Murder and Voluntary manslaughter - analysis of cases and the plea of involuntary manslaughter.

    is 'No'. She would have died anyway. Judicial Principle: Therefore the defendant was acquitted of murder because he did not cause his mother death as there was no factual cause of the death because the actual cause was natural and not affected by the defendants act The principle can also be seen in an unusual way.

  2. The law relating to the defence of insanity is out dated and unsatisfactory. Reform ...

    Another obvious criticism is that these rules which define insanity are a strictly legal term - there is no link what so ever between medical insanity and legal insanity, so the statement is accurate in suggesting reform in the interest of common sense.

  1. Law A2 unit 4 murder problem answer plan

    Also, the chain of causation can be broken by the actions of the victim, so the fact that Derek jumped in to the river could mean a break in causation as Charles may not have anticipated the fact that the chase may have lead to the river, and because Derek

  2. Law on women

    At their original trial the prosecution claimed that there was no sudden and temporary loss of control because it was thought that their actions were deliberate. The critics and campaigners said that the requirement for "temporary and sudden loss of control" was discriminative to women.

  1. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    This decision has been widely criticised however, as the underlying cause of the hypoglycaemia was diabetes. If he didn?t suffer from diabetes, he would not have been in a hypoglycaemic state, and so many argue that this case has been wrongly decided.

  2. Nina runs a burger bar. She puts up a sign in the window saying ...

    principle determinant of criminal liability given the other key elements being so wide. However, the Fraud Act 2006 contains no definition of 'dishonesty'. The Law Commission and Home Office intend that the Ghosh test, not Section 2 of the Theft Act 1968, should apply, and the Law Officers confirmed this in Parliament.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work