• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In relation to voluntary manslaughter discuss the suggestion that the current law is satisfactory and not in need of reform.

Extracts from this document...


In relation to voluntary manslaughter discuss the suggestion that the current law is satisfactory and not in need of reform. Diminished responsibility can be used as a defence if the defendant had an abnormality of mind, which was a cause of the killing. This is more satisfactory than having to use insanity for a defence, however there are still problems with it. The burden of proof should not be on the defendant, in most other defences the defendant only has to raise the issue and the prosecution has to disprove it. This should also apply to diminished responsibility. At the moment defendants pleading diminished responsibility are at a disadvantage which is not faced by those raising provocation. ...read more.


Also the law commission has pointed out that there is a disagreement on whether the concept of 'substantial impairment of mental responsibility' is a medical question. This should not be decided by doctors as this is a moral question. The wording can also confuse the jury and a lack of understanding leads to inconsistent decisions. There is also in many cases, an overlap of the defences diminished responsibility and provocation, as the jury has to take into account the defendants mental state when deciding if provocation should succeed. This can cause confusion when they put forward both defences, as for provocation the defence only have to raise the issue, but for diminished responsibility the defence has to prove it on the balance of probabilities. ...read more.


This means that a completely innocent person can be ruled as provocation and that the victim doesn't have to realise its actions are provoking. Provocation provides a defence for anger, but there is no defence for people who kill in fear or out of despair or compassion. Why is it that people can be excused because of anger when surely people who kill in fear or out of despair or compassion should have a defence? Some reforms have been proposed. One is that only 'gross provocation' would be accepted for provocation. This would prevent cases such as Doughty been successful. The partial defence should not be applied where the provocation was incited by the defendant for the purpose of providing an excuse to use violence or if the defendant acted in considered desire for revenge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is the current law on the non-fatal offences against the person satisfactory?

    4 star(s)

    severe of injuries would constitute "serious" injury, with the remainder being downgraded to the category of "intentional or reckless injury". The proposed new offences of "reckless serious injury" and "reckless injury" will require proof that the defendant foresaw "serious injury" and "injury" respectively.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    There are two main cases which highlight the problems of the all or nothing defence of self defence. The first is Clegg (1994), who was a soldier on duty at a check point in Northern Ireland, when a stolen car came at him at speed.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss whether the rules governing insanity as a defence in criminal law are in ...

    3 star(s)

    The first rule is that the defendant must have ?disease of mind? but here we are not talking about the medical definition. The cause of the disease of mind must be internal meaning that the likes of brain tumours don?t count.

  2. Critically consider whether the law governing involuntary manslaughter is in a satisfactory state.

    In Dalby (1982), Waller LJ said, obiter, that 'where the charge of manslaughter is based on an unlawful and dangerous act, it must be an act directed at the victim and likely to cause immediate injury, however slight.' This dictum particularly the reference to 'an act directed at the victim' is notoriously ambiguous.

  1. Murder and Voluntary manslaughter - analysis of cases and the plea of involuntary manslaughter.

    This was seen in the case of Pagett 1983. Legal Facts: Defendant armed with a shotgun and cartridges, shot at police who were attempting to arrest him. Defendant held a 16-year-old girl who was pregnant by him as a shield.

  2. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    As a result of her refusal to accept a blood transfusion, the victim died of her wounds. The court of Appeal rejected the defendant's argument that her refusal broke the chain of causation, on the ground that the accused had to take the victim as he found her.

  1. In relation to murder (including voluntary manslaughter), consider the suggestion that the current law ...

    prevocational cases. Intention is the only form of MR required for murder. Following the CJA "67 this is purely a subjective test, which may create problems. Intention can be direct or indirect. Direct intention is easily understood while indirect intention is unclear.

  2. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    He claimed he had been sleepwalking. At his trial, the judge left automatism to the jury, who acquitted him. The Supreme Court of Canada upheld these acquittals. The leading judge said that ?accepting the medical evidence, the respondent?s mind was and its functioning must have been impaired at the relevant time but sleepwalking did not impair it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work