• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the three stories "A Vendetta" by Guy De Maupassant, "Crackling Day" by world's famous novelist Peter Abrahams and "The Gold Cadillac" written by Mildred Taylor the writers present different ideas of justice

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How writers present different ideas of justice in societies In the three stories "A Vendetta" by Guy De Maupassant, "Crackling Day" by world's famous novelist Peter Abrahams and "The Gold Cadillac" written by Mildred Taylor the writers present different ideas of justice in the societies in which their stories are set. Justice is the concept involving the fair, moral and impartial treatment of all persons - often seen as the continued effort to do what is "right." Justice is a particularly foundational concept within most systems of "law," and draws highly upon established and well-regarded social traditions and values.* The first story, a very popular novel "A Vendetta" written by the greatest French short story writer Guy De Maupassant is set in the Mediterranean Italy - the island Sardinia and its surrounding areas. The protagonist in the plot is an old woman, widow Saverini, also referred to as 'the old mother'. Mother Saverini had a son Antonio who was one day "treacherously stabbed by Nicolas Ravolati." The old woman wanted justice for her only son's murderer and decided to take revenge. In "A Vendetta" justice is achieved by revenge. Woman Saverini faced a dilemma because she was old and incapable of taking longer journeys but she promised her son a vendetta. "Your mother always keeps her word, you know she does." The author has used the theme of the "Italian Revenge," which appears especially in the south part of "the shoe," in which the story is set to justify why the mother was so concerned about the revenge, justice and equality. ...read more.

Middle

The white boys got away with their crime. Uncle Sam was very unhappy with his acting but he understood that this was the best case - the consequences could have been much worse for the whole family. On the next day he brought his nephew an orange, a bag of sweets and a picture book as a compensation, hoping that "You'll [nephew will] understand one day. This probably was the only just part of the whole plot - boy gets punished for something which was not really that bad but then he gets recompensed with presents. Peter Abrahams presents both justice and injustice in his short story. The unjust part is punishing the black boy in an extremely violent way for a crime which was not as serious as the punishment and the getting away with racism of the white boys. It was only just that the black boy got rewarded on the next day for the unjustly carried punishment. The third and last story studied is called "The Gold Cadillac" and is set in the north part of the North American continent. It shows a community of a neighbourhood consisting of black people. The main characters belong to a family made up of a couple with two children, uncles and aunts. Just like the previous short story, this one is also about racial discrimination against black people. ...read more.

Conclusion

I think that the most interesting, but at the same time deeply disturbing and depressing story is the second one explained in this essay - "Crackling Day" by Peter Abrahams. It gives me an insight into the South African culture and the evil system of apartheid. There is a lot to write about this story in terms of how justice and injustice are presented. In all three stories justice and/or injustice are presented in a specifically different way. In "A Vendetta" justice is achieved by the mother taking revenge in the climax, where the murderer is killed. This situation is a reference to the words that Matthew wrote in the Bible centuries ago - "Eye for eye, tooth for tooth." The murderer killed a boy but at the end the same situation happened to him - he got punished for murdering in exactly the same way as he murdered Antonio Saverini. In "Crackling Day" both justice and injustice appear. The boy gets insulted and hit by a guy of the other colour just for being black. He gets involved in a fight for his and his father's honour. When he comes back home he is punished for what he did; I think that the fact that he fought was well justified because he was deeply cursed and provoked to start the conflict. At the end justice is shown when the boy gets presents and apologies from his uncle for the violence, which was also justified, it could always be worse. *Source: wikipedia.com ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    States, research revealed that bargains were far superior for white defendants than they were for black defendants. By introducing a formal system it will not solve equal bargains as ethnic minority defendants are more likely to exercise their right to trial.18 It is well known that in criminal proceedings if

  2. The winslow boy

    Grace Winslow is Ronnie's mother she is very faithful to her husband, she keeps the children educated and makes sure they are well behaved. She does what Arthur tells her. Catherine Winslow, Ronnie's sister is a very independent and strong-minded girl who is in love with John and respects her family.

  1. What changes have been made to the novel Harry Potter to make the film ...

    This sentence was changed into a complex sentence in the film by the use of the coordinating conjunction "but" to make the speech flow naturally. The sentence "You can't have met many wizards then" was used in the film but in the novel the adverb of time "then" was omitted because it makes the sentence sound like a question.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    As aboriginal authors Monture-Okanee and Turpel describe: The person with authority to resolve conflicts among aboriginal peoples in their community must be someone known to them who can look at all aspects of a problem, not an unknown person set apart from the community in an 'impartial' way.

  1. Mandatory Minimums: A National Injustice

    The population in prisons has radically increased. From 1980 to 1999 the prison population has tripled. As Eric Schlosser notes, "California alone holds more inmates in its jails and prisons than do France, Great Britain, Germany, Japan, Singapore, and the Netherlands combined," (qtd in Easterbrook 57). This, along with the excessive prison terms, has contributed to the rise in the Federal Prison budget.

  2. "Examine why sexual offenders attract so much attention these days. How has the Criminal ...

    He identified a universal tendency for society to focus all its fears on one identified group. This he noted, shifts overtime in accordance with societies level of tolerance of certain behaviours. For example drug users and single parents were once the target of much condemnation, however currently, it is paedophiles

  1. How effectively does Gary Kilworth convey his Ideas on law and justice in his ...

    Narrative structure in Murderers Walk is in the style of the rules of a game which is ironic because in the story there are no rules, this suggests that Gary Kilworth believes rules are needed in society. If there are no rules then humanity will simply create some showing the power of imagination and that natural justice will prevail eventually.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    to the jury but this does not mean that the jury should trust the evidence any more than that of an eye witness. If the jury just sits and listens to the evidence without at any point considering its accuracy and validity then serious issues can arise.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work