• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss. The idea of parliamentary sovereignty is that Parliament (or strictly, the Queen in Parliament) can make or unmake any law on any subject whatever, without any legal restriction. This idea was generally accepted as reality a hundred years ago, or even fifty years ago, but there must now be some doubt as to its truth. Parliament is certainly restricted by the UK's membership of the European Union, and other international treaties such as the European Convention on Human Rights may also have put some limits on its freedom to legislate. Nevertheless, the powers of Parliament are undoubtedly considerable. An Act of Parliament can determine the succession to the Crown, for example, and the Act of Settlement 1700 (which is still in force) transferred the line of succession from James II to Princess Sophia and her Protestant descendants. Similarly, the Abdication Act 1936 recognised the abdication of Edward VIII in favour of his brother who became George VI. Parliament can also alter its own composition and powers, as it did by the Parliament Act 1911 (which removed the veto powers of the House of Lords) ...read more.

Middle

When a bill has been passed in identical terms in both Houses, it is presented for the royal assent, when Commissioners acting for the Queen indicate her approval of the proposal by the Norman French phrase "La Reyne le veult" (the Queen wishes it). If the Queen wished to signify disapproval, the tactful phrase would be "La Reyne s'avisera" (the Queen will consider it), but the royal assent has never been refused to any bill passed by both Houses since 1704 (when Queen Anne refused her assent to the Scottish Militia Bill), and most constitutional lawyers now believe that in any but the most extraordinary circumstances the sovereign is bound to assent. Without any doubt, the greatest limitations on Parliamentary sovereignty now arise from membership of the European Union. There is room for debate as to whether this is a good or a bad thing, and/or whether the advantages of membership outweigh the perceived disadvantage of lost sovereignty, but any sensible person must surely admit that Parliamentary sovereignty has been curtailed. There are three main ways in which this is evident. First, there is now an external body (or bodies, perhaps) ...read more.

Conclusion

Campbell & Fell v United Kingdom (1984) 7 EHRR 165, ECHR A number of prisoners involved in a prison riot were charged with disciplinary offences under the Prison Rules, and were sentenced by the Board of Visitors to a substantial loss of remission. No legal representation was permitted at the disciplinary hearing, and subsequent consultations with the prisoners' solicitors took place in the presence of a prison officer. The Court said this was in breach of Art.6, guaranteeing the right to a fair trial. The Government subsequently changed the Prison Rules to allow legal representation in cases where the prison authorities could impose a substantial loss of remission. A further limitation of Parliamentary sovereignty, some might say, is the use of referenda to decide major constitutional issues. The first national referendum in 1974 asked whether the United Kingdom should remain in the European Community, and the Labour Party have all but promised a referendum on the single currency within the next five years. (In between times, there have been devolution referendums in Wales and Scotland.) Although Parliament retains the right to decide when and on what issue a referendum is to be held, and could in theory ignore the result, the reality is that there is a temporary transfer of power from parliament to the populace at large Claire Spencer Page 1 10/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    Flegg (1988)57. Once all three requirements are satisfied, the right claimed is converted by the fact of actual occupation into an overriding interest, binding on all purchasers of land58. Interestingly the Law Commission recommend a reduction in the number of overriding interests, but the retention of S.70(1)(g).

  2. Commercial law discussion - 'Transfer of Title by a Non-Owner'.

    The Court of Appeal held that, although the plaintiff had avoided A's title, A was still a buyer in possession of the car and that B had, obtained a good title from A when he bought from him in good faith and had taken possession of the car.

  1. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    legislation, and a declaration of incompatibility "does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of the provision". If it so wishes, Parliament may amend the offending legislation under section 10 of Schedule 2, which, in a sense, achieves an equilibrium between having regard for the ECHR and maintaining Parliament's legislative supremacy.

  2. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    When a declaration of incompatibility is made this does not mean that an automatic amendment is made as under section 10 of the act there is another discretion regarding whether or not to amend or repeal legislation via the fast-track procedure.

  1. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    This section of the Criminal Justice and Public Order act also give a police constable the power to search the premises where the arrested person was at the time of arrest. A police constable may search the premises if he/she has reasonable grounds to believe that evidence for the arrest is on the premises.

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    improvements in protection of children's and parents' rights in states like, among others, Netherlands and Switzerland103. However, such public hearing can still be restricted by legitimate aim and proportional actions, where protection of interests of others requires it104. Art. 9, 10 and 11 - the Court's application of these rights to children presents a serious weakness.

  1. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    interpretation that aided, to a degree, the protection of some basic freedoms.11 The Parliament occupies a central place in the legal system. There were no legal limits on the authority of the Parliament as they have the power to make constitutional changes by ordinary process of legislation.

  2. "The key provisions of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 are inconsistent, incoherent and unfair." ...

    so many offences, some of which may be very difficult to police, has led to some commentators criticising the so-called over-criminalisation of certain activities and of unnecessary state interference in domestic life. However, although this has been deemed unfair, the legislation is designed to protect the most vulnerable, those who

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work