• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss. The idea of parliamentary sovereignty is that Parliament (or strictly, the Queen in Parliament) can make or unmake any law on any subject whatever, without any legal restriction. This idea was generally accepted as reality a hundred years ago, or even fifty years ago, but there must now be some doubt as to its truth. Parliament is certainly restricted by the UK's membership of the European Union, and other international treaties such as the European Convention on Human Rights may also have put some limits on its freedom to legislate. Nevertheless, the powers of Parliament are undoubtedly considerable. An Act of Parliament can determine the succession to the Crown, for example, and the Act of Settlement 1700 (which is still in force) transferred the line of succession from James II to Princess Sophia and her Protestant descendants. Similarly, the Abdication Act 1936 recognised the abdication of Edward VIII in favour of his brother who became George VI. Parliament can also alter its own composition and powers, as it did by the Parliament Act 1911 (which removed the veto powers of the House of Lords) ...read more.


When a bill has been passed in identical terms in both Houses, it is presented for the royal assent, when Commissioners acting for the Queen indicate her approval of the proposal by the Norman French phrase "La Reyne le veult" (the Queen wishes it). If the Queen wished to signify disapproval, the tactful phrase would be "La Reyne s'avisera" (the Queen will consider it), but the royal assent has never been refused to any bill passed by both Houses since 1704 (when Queen Anne refused her assent to the Scottish Militia Bill), and most constitutional lawyers now believe that in any but the most extraordinary circumstances the sovereign is bound to assent. Without any doubt, the greatest limitations on Parliamentary sovereignty now arise from membership of the European Union. There is room for debate as to whether this is a good or a bad thing, and/or whether the advantages of membership outweigh the perceived disadvantage of lost sovereignty, but any sensible person must surely admit that Parliamentary sovereignty has been curtailed. There are three main ways in which this is evident. First, there is now an external body (or bodies, perhaps) ...read more.


Campbell & Fell v United Kingdom (1984) 7 EHRR 165, ECHR A number of prisoners involved in a prison riot were charged with disciplinary offences under the Prison Rules, and were sentenced by the Board of Visitors to a substantial loss of remission. No legal representation was permitted at the disciplinary hearing, and subsequent consultations with the prisoners' solicitors took place in the presence of a prison officer. The Court said this was in breach of Art.6, guaranteeing the right to a fair trial. The Government subsequently changed the Prison Rules to allow legal representation in cases where the prison authorities could impose a substantial loss of remission. A further limitation of Parliamentary sovereignty, some might say, is the use of referenda to decide major constitutional issues. The first national referendum in 1974 asked whether the United Kingdom should remain in the European Community, and the Labour Party have all but promised a referendum on the single currency within the next five years. (In between times, there have been devolution referendums in Wales and Scotland.) Although Parliament retains the right to decide when and on what issue a referendum is to be held, and could in theory ignore the result, the reality is that there is a temporary transfer of power from parliament to the populace at large Claire Spencer Page 1 10/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Free essay

    How effective are domestic and international legal measures in dealing with human trafficking?

    for survivors, and human trafficking and to empower survivors to act as agents of social change. The Anti-Slavery project is an organisation that clearly illustrates the effective role that is being exercised in order to eradicate trafficking and slavery in this international community to thus prevent this crime from occurring.

  2. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    Section 4 ingeniously empowers judges to openly express their loyalty to the values laid out in the Convention while simultaneously avoiding any covert undermining of Parliament's intentions (Loveland, 2003). Lord Irvine (2003) praised section 4(6) for expressly protecting Parliamentary sovereignty - Parliament is under no legal obligation to amend incompatible

  1. Commercial law discussion - 'Transfer of Title by a Non-Owner'.

    In the same way, the defendant in the Bishopsgate case is under a hire purchase agreement and is not a buyer for the purpose of s25 because, in such a case, the defendant has only agreed to hire the

  2. Legislations and regulations in sport

    "Data Protection: The Government's Proposals" (CM 3725) was issued in July 1997 prior to the introduction of the Data Protection Bill which subsequently received Royal Assent on 16 July 1998. Its main provisions come into force on 1st March 2000. Scope of the Act 2. The Act defines personal data as that which relates to a living

  1. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    A challenge might, however, be possible on the basis that the State had failed in its duty under Art1 to 'secure to everyone within its jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention... The failure of English law to recognise, either under the common law, or statue, a right

  2. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    purchaser can take the land free of the minor interest, Clark v. Chief Land Registrar (1993)25. Inhibition26 is a powerful form of protection which inhibits any dealings with the registered land until an order of the court is obtained, or a specified event occurs. Used in bankruptcy or emergency situations.

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    8 rights are too often not respected70. It is regretful that this empowerment does not apply to administrative/disciplinary procedures - ward/secure accommodation order, expulsion from school - whereas Dutch legislation provides this71. Elsewhere, the Court has achieved remarkable results, like proclamation in Marckx v.

  2. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    will be liable for the damage caused and must compensate for such damages. A police constable can only stop and search a vehicle when in uniform as they do not have the authority to carry out a search when wearing civilian clothing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work