• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss. The idea of parliamentary sovereignty is that Parliament (or strictly, the Queen in Parliament) can make or unmake any law on any subject whatever, without any legal restriction. This idea was generally accepted as reality a hundred years ago, or even fifty years ago, but there must now be some doubt as to its truth. Parliament is certainly restricted by the UK's membership of the European Union, and other international treaties such as the European Convention on Human Rights may also have put some limits on its freedom to legislate. Nevertheless, the powers of Parliament are undoubtedly considerable. An Act of Parliament can determine the succession to the Crown, for example, and the Act of Settlement 1700 (which is still in force) transferred the line of succession from James II to Princess Sophia and her Protestant descendants. Similarly, the Abdication Act 1936 recognised the abdication of Edward VIII in favour of his brother who became George VI. Parliament can also alter its own composition and powers, as it did by the Parliament Act 1911 (which removed the veto powers of the House of Lords) ...read more.

Middle

When a bill has been passed in identical terms in both Houses, it is presented for the royal assent, when Commissioners acting for the Queen indicate her approval of the proposal by the Norman French phrase "La Reyne le veult" (the Queen wishes it). If the Queen wished to signify disapproval, the tactful phrase would be "La Reyne s'avisera" (the Queen will consider it), but the royal assent has never been refused to any bill passed by both Houses since 1704 (when Queen Anne refused her assent to the Scottish Militia Bill), and most constitutional lawyers now believe that in any but the most extraordinary circumstances the sovereign is bound to assent. Without any doubt, the greatest limitations on Parliamentary sovereignty now arise from membership of the European Union. There is room for debate as to whether this is a good or a bad thing, and/or whether the advantages of membership outweigh the perceived disadvantage of lost sovereignty, but any sensible person must surely admit that Parliamentary sovereignty has been curtailed. There are three main ways in which this is evident. First, there is now an external body (or bodies, perhaps) ...read more.

Conclusion

Campbell & Fell v United Kingdom (1984) 7 EHRR 165, ECHR A number of prisoners involved in a prison riot were charged with disciplinary offences under the Prison Rules, and were sentenced by the Board of Visitors to a substantial loss of remission. No legal representation was permitted at the disciplinary hearing, and subsequent consultations with the prisoners' solicitors took place in the presence of a prison officer. The Court said this was in breach of Art.6, guaranteeing the right to a fair trial. The Government subsequently changed the Prison Rules to allow legal representation in cases where the prison authorities could impose a substantial loss of remission. A further limitation of Parliamentary sovereignty, some might say, is the use of referenda to decide major constitutional issues. The first national referendum in 1974 asked whether the United Kingdom should remain in the European Community, and the Labour Party have all but promised a referendum on the single currency within the next five years. (In between times, there have been devolution referendums in Wales and Scotland.) Although Parliament retains the right to decide when and on what issue a referendum is to be held, and could in theory ignore the result, the reality is that there is a temporary transfer of power from parliament to the populace at large Claire Spencer Page 1 10/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    Throughout the essay I have attempted to show, at times, flaws have been discovered in the operation of the legislation, and corresponding recommendations for reform by the Law Commission have been made. The need for such reforms reflects the imperfect nature of some areas of the legislation.

  2. There are a number of advantages and disadvantages for law making in the Westminster ...

    through the passing of bills between the House of Commons, House of Lords and finally the Royal Assent. Due to the complexity of English law this is not the only way in which law is created but is the main way.

  1. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    The traditional view to this is that there is 'no half way house'. A police constable also has the power to question someone before a search. They should make all efforts to reduce the embarrassment caused by the search. This could be achieved by carrying out the search in a secluded area.

  2. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    If one takes the view that orthodox notions of Parliamentary sovereignty hinge upon the presumption that courts will generally adopt a literalist approach to statutory interpretation, section 3 does, in effect, impact on Parliament's sovereignty, but not drastically (Loveland, 2003).

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    Meanwhile, freedom of information without positive restriction is still primarily in access to general sources of information only119. Perhaps one of Court's most disappointing decisions was that there is no reason to consider child's right to freedom of religion separately from parents', taken in Valsamis v.

  2. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty."12 Section 3 requires all legislation to be compatible with it and that if it does not there is discretion under section 4 given to the courts to make a declaration of incompatibility and therefore the particular legislation does not need to be followed.

  1. The Human Rights Act of 1998 is an act of parliament from the United ...

    In the United Kingdom there is no written constitution. Within it, individuals have been entitled to do whatever the law did not forbid. The doctrine of the sovereignty of Parliament, meant that Parliament was free to remove or control, individual liberties at any time, just by passing the legislation necessary.

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    Goldsmith gained an apology off the Eye and a contribution towards his legal costs. Should people have a right to privacy? Having thoroughly researched the subject of privacy and reviewed the evidence, I can appreciate that this is a very complex matter and I can understand why the law is so inconclusive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work