• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"It would be hard to over emphasise either the contribution made by implied terms in building up a contract of employment or the flexibility and power this operation gives to the judges whose job it is to construe the contract" - Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


"It would be hard to over emphasise either the contribution made by implied terms in building up a contract of employment or the flexibility and power this operation gives to the judges whose job it is to construe the contract" - Discuss. Employment law is a very complex subject and greatly dynamic this is because law is always changing. More and more rules and regulations are brought about, more terms are being introduced as well this is because of flexibility of the judges. This occurs during a tribunal or employment law related case. When an offer of employment is been accepted unconditionally a contract of employment comes into play the terms of a contract can be written or oral as well as implied. Even though the written statement that exists is not the contract, this can still be used as evidence later on when a dispute occurs between the employer and employee. The terms can be found in a lot of places including job adverts, letters to the employee and staff handbooks. A written contract must be written up when the employee is at the same place of work for a month or longer, this will include the term and conditions of the employment. To change the existing contract of employment the employer must get consent either written oral or implied though a collective agreement this is an agreement between the employer and employee or their representative, it is no more than a "gentleman's agreement". ...read more.


No employers would employ him, as if he was part of the illegal operation. This was known as 'the kiss of death', as he was unable to find any employment. Therefore he took action against the bank. Courts decided employer had duty of care to conduct the business in a legally correct manner, since the business did not do so Malik was tainted by association, the courts agreed, Malik had been stigmatised by the bank and was awarded stigma damages because of the breech of implied term of mutual trust and confidence. In some circumstances under implied term to be used as a basis for a claim by the employee who has not been badly treated but treated less favourably by other employees in the case of Transco plc v O'Brien, the employee was sourced through an agency basis he was then made permanent, all full time offered new terms with the new company, but not O'Brien, court decided he was not treated badly but treated less favourable which was a breech of implied duty of mutual trust and confidence. Implied terms can be implied by conduct in the case Lotus Cars v Sutcliffe 1982 this was regarding redundancy pay and the number of hours worked per week. Sutcliffe became redundant, there pay was calculated by the number of hours meant to work which was 40 per week in the original contract, but in the staff handbook it referred to working a 45 hour week where the extra hours were normal extra time. ...read more.


Ltd; this case regarded dress codes in the workplace. Boychuk was an accounts clerk, she sometimes came into contact with customers and she always wore bright big badges referring to lesbianism, they included 'gay power'. Her employers ordered her to remove these badges or she will get dismissed, she refused and therefore dismissed. She claimed for unfair dismissal, courts looked at all the circumstances and decided it was fair. Since this case there have been discrimination laws, sex, race, gender, and disability and gender laws reassigned. Therefore of this case was decided today it would have been a very different outcome. In the implied term duty to give faithful service, employer is under no duty to disclose his own misconducts or any wrong doings but under a duty to disclose the misconduct of his/her subordinates, even if by doing so they criminate them selves. In conclusion implied terms are of customary practice, we see implied terms can be made because of the power of the judges' decisions and also the flexibility of the judges. This can be seen in the case of Malik explained in detail above. Since employment law is forever changing some of the cases above would have different outcomes if they went to court today. I feel as if the flexibility and power of the judge's makes less contribution to building up a contract of employment than implied terms, this is because implied terms are more frequently cited against employers. Word Count: 2,492 ?? ?? ?? ?? Law of the workplace assessment Louise Marshall 03001693 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    a fixed price and a price varying with the cost of labour and materials. The offeree purported to accept "your tender" and it was held that there was no contract as there was no way of telling which price term had been accepted.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    In this Assignment I am going to describe the requirements of a valid contract ...

    3 star(s)

    It is illegal for someone below the age of 18 to enter certain contracts. If someone below the age of 18 enters such a contract, this would mean that the contract will be invalid, in other words a contract made by a party who is of unsound mind or under influence of drink or drugs is "prima facie" valid.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The defendants agreed to transport the claimant's oil rig using either 1 or 2. Before performance the defendants allocated 2 to the contract with the claimant and 1 to other concluded contracts. 2 then sank. He contract was performed by a more expensive mode of transport.

  2. Free essay

    Outline how consumers are protected in contracts for the sale of goods, identifying relevant ...

    Breaching a condition will allow the other party to the contract to terminate it by 'repudiating' it and to claim damages. Breaching a warranty will only allow a damages claim and does not bring the contract to an end. Breach of contract A breach of contract is caused by a failure to perform a duty specified by the contract.

  1. Explain what is meant by an unfair term in a contract and describe and ...

    subject matter of the contract or which concerns the adequacy of the price or remuneration, as against the goods and services supplied in exchange, in so far as these terms are in plain intelligible language'6 It may seem peculiar that these terms are excluded from the fairness requirement , but

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    When a person tenders for a contract he is making an offer to the person who has advertised a contract as being available. An example would be if you wanted to borrow a loan you might obtain tenders from three different banks, you therefore receive three different offers and you then decide which one to accept.

  1. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    Instead of half share claimed by Benny, the possible remedies may be granted i.e. monetary compensation or given a licence to occupy for a limited period. Finally, equity may intervene to enforce certain kinds of informal agreements. Those relevant equitable doctrines already disclosed i.e.

  2. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    Since Camilla is doing more than she had originally agreed to do (she is providing decorative pots), it seems that there will be consideration for Ildar's promise of more money (Hartley v. Ponsonby(1857)). But even though Camilla has given consideration for Ildar's promise, Ildar may avoid paying if the promise was obtained by economic duress.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work