• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

judges and jury's

Extracts from this document...


Describe the different roles of the judge and jury in a Crown Court trial. In England and Wales, serious criminal cases are tried "on indictment" by a judge and a jury in the Crown Court. The judge is a professional lawyer, but the jury consists of twelve men and women, with no previous connection with the case, chosen at random for this duty. The judge is responsible for matters of law and matters of procedure. Before the trial itself, the judge presides over a case management hearing to settle (with the lawyers) such matters as the expected length of the trial, the names of the witnesses to be called, any special facilities required such as video links or interpreters. If the defendant intends to plead guilty, of course, there is no need for a trial as such, and a date is set at once for a sentencing hearing. At the trial, the judge ensures that proper procedures are followed. Sometimes there are issues of law to be settled - the admissibility of particular evidence, for example, or the legal validity of a particular defence - and the judge rules on these matters as they arise. ...read more.


If the jury returns a verdict of "guilty", the judge alone is responsible for passing an appropriate sentence. The prosecuting lawyer tells the judge about the defendant's previous criminal record, and the defendant's lawyer makes a plea in mitigation, but the jury has no part to play in sentencing. (b) Identify and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using a jury to decide the verdict in a criminal trial. Lord Devlin once described the jury as "the lamp that shows that freedom lives" - a defendant is tried not merely by "the state", but by his or her fellow-citizens. Professional judges and even lay magistrates may become "case-hardened" and reluctant to accept explanations they have heard many times before: an innocent defendant may get a fairer trial from a group of ordinary people coming to the case with an open mind. Certainly the jury is far more representative of society at large than either judges or magistrates, being drawn at random from those aged between 18 and 70. That is not to say that each individual jury is representative: once in every two thousand cases, for example, the random jury will be all-male or all-female, and quite often it will be all-white even in areas with a significant black population. ...read more.


Similarly in R v Blythe, the jury refused to convict a man who supplied cannabis to his sick wife, having found this was the only way to ease the pain of her illness. But this can be taken too far: in R v Owen the jury acquitted a man who shot the careless driver who had killed his son. Jurors may also forget that their job is to try the case on the evidence, disregarding all prejudice and other irrelevant factors. In R v Young a man was convicted of murder after four jurors held a s´┐Żance in which they supposedly spoke with the spirit of the victim, and psychological experiments have shown that the defendant's personal appearance can influence the jury's decision. Another disadvantage of the jury system is that it imposes a heavy burden on ordinary people, who have to leave their job, their education or their family commitments for two weeks to sit in the Crown Court. Until quite recently busy people could be excused jury service, but the law has now been changed to make this much more difficult. It seems foolish that a highly skilled doctor, for example, must leave his life-saving work to decide whether a person is guilty of shoplifting. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    putting it together and creating a system in order to bring all the members together in a common market. One of the main reason for creating direct effect is to make the EC law effective and for integration to take place.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

    4 star(s)

    Who, then, in law, is my neighbour? The answer seems to be persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question."

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the extent to which judges are representative of society.

    3 star(s)

    The Human Rights Act 1998 has made judges more powerful than they've ever been before because they are now able to send an act back to parliament if it breaches human rights. Since the act was passed, judges have shown they are more willing to challenge the government on key issues such as detention without trial.

  2. The task of the jury is to weigh up the evidence presented to them ...

    Even though it is just one percent, this can mean up to 30,000 trials and that are usually the most serious offences, such assaulting a police officer or drunk driving are dealt with in the magistrates court while the most absurd theft can be tried in the Crown court.

  1. The role and appointment of judges.

    This should then result in the best candidates being appointed and is a fair and open system. c) The Office for Judicial Complaints was set up by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 to handle complaints about the personal conduct of all judges and to provide advice and assistance to the

  2. Free essay

    Legal personnel

    jury can compromise of unqualified and qualified citizens, who are required to try cases based on the facts that have been presented before them, in the court. To become a judge, it could be suggested that the academic route is the same as that of lawyers, because judges are selected from a pool of lawyers.

  1. Family Law

    Husband petitioned for divorce. Held; divorce granted as she had committed adultery and he found it intolerable to live with her. If the respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent, this may be used as one of the facts.


    After examining the dead body of culshaw, a pistol wad found in the head wound matched perfectly with a torn newspaper found in Toms' pocket. In 1816, a farm labourer was convicted of murdering a young maidservant in Warwick, England.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work