• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

judges and jury's

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the different roles of the judge and jury in a Crown Court trial. In England and Wales, serious criminal cases are tried "on indictment" by a judge and a jury in the Crown Court. The judge is a professional lawyer, but the jury consists of twelve men and women, with no previous connection with the case, chosen at random for this duty. The judge is responsible for matters of law and matters of procedure. Before the trial itself, the judge presides over a case management hearing to settle (with the lawyers) such matters as the expected length of the trial, the names of the witnesses to be called, any special facilities required such as video links or interpreters. If the defendant intends to plead guilty, of course, there is no need for a trial as such, and a date is set at once for a sentencing hearing. At the trial, the judge ensures that proper procedures are followed. Sometimes there are issues of law to be settled - the admissibility of particular evidence, for example, or the legal validity of a particular defence - and the judge rules on these matters as they arise. ...read more.

Middle

If the jury returns a verdict of "guilty", the judge alone is responsible for passing an appropriate sentence. The prosecuting lawyer tells the judge about the defendant's previous criminal record, and the defendant's lawyer makes a plea in mitigation, but the jury has no part to play in sentencing. (b) Identify and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using a jury to decide the verdict in a criminal trial. Lord Devlin once described the jury as "the lamp that shows that freedom lives" - a defendant is tried not merely by "the state", but by his or her fellow-citizens. Professional judges and even lay magistrates may become "case-hardened" and reluctant to accept explanations they have heard many times before: an innocent defendant may get a fairer trial from a group of ordinary people coming to the case with an open mind. Certainly the jury is far more representative of society at large than either judges or magistrates, being drawn at random from those aged between 18 and 70. That is not to say that each individual jury is representative: once in every two thousand cases, for example, the random jury will be all-male or all-female, and quite often it will be all-white even in areas with a significant black population. ...read more.

Conclusion

Similarly in R v Blythe, the jury refused to convict a man who supplied cannabis to his sick wife, having found this was the only way to ease the pain of her illness. But this can be taken too far: in R v Owen the jury acquitted a man who shot the careless driver who had killed his son. Jurors may also forget that their job is to try the case on the evidence, disregarding all prejudice and other irrelevant factors. In R v Young a man was convicted of murder after four jurors held a s´┐Żance in which they supposedly spoke with the spirit of the victim, and psychological experiments have shown that the defendant's personal appearance can influence the jury's decision. Another disadvantage of the jury system is that it imposes a heavy burden on ordinary people, who have to leave their job, their education or their family commitments for two weeks to sit in the Crown Court. Until quite recently busy people could be excused jury service, but the law has now been changed to make this much more difficult. It seems foolish that a highly skilled doctor, for example, must leave his life-saving work to decide whether a person is guilty of shoplifting. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    putting it together and creating a system in order to bring all the members together in a common market. One of the main reason for creating direct effect is to make the EC law effective and for integration to take place.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

    4 star(s)

    Hotel and its insurer would be best advised to settle the matter out of court to avoid the management time, expense and negative publicity that would be entailed in litigation. Peter vs MacGregor On the matter of Peter's stolen Olympus camera I'm relying on the provision provided under the Hotel

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the extent to which judges are representative of society.

    3 star(s)

    The report was conducted after there was a public uproar over an incident where a police officer had made the assumption that a black male stabbing victim was a criminal because of his skin colour. According to the report, ethnic minorities do not have faith in the criminal justice system

  2. The task of the jury is to weigh up the evidence presented to them ...

    Juries only decide cases heard in the Crown court, when among the 5 percent of uses heard there the defendant would most likely plead guilty in the cases meaning there is no need for a jury. The result is that juries actually only decide around 1 percent of criminal cases.

  1. The role and appointment of judges.

    The Commissioners consider all the information gathered on the candidates and select candidates to be recommended to the Lord Chancellor for appointment. Final checks are then done. For existing judges seeking promotion, this is with the Office for Judicial Complaints, to see that there are no complaints outstanding against the candidate.

  2. Free essay

    Legal personnel

    now paved the way for solicitors to acquire full rights of audience; provided they have completed the required training, (www.barcouncil.org.uk). Although the job of a barrister is demanding and they are not allowed to work in partnership with other barristers; even though they are permitted to share chambers.

  1. Family Law

    Any period or periods totalling less than six months will be disregarded. However, the court will consider an accumulative period of six moths or more. There is no requirement to actually name the person with whom the respondent has committed adultery.

  2. FORENSICS ON TRIAL

    After examining the dead body of culshaw, a pistol wad found in the head wound matched perfectly with a torn newspaper found in Toms' pocket. In 1816, a farm labourer was convicted of murdering a young maidservant in Warwick, England.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work