• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Judicial Precedent

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a) Describe the system of judicial precedent Judicial precedent is the system where the judge makes the law, where decisions that are made by the judges in the cases before them form case law. In deciding each case the facts have to be established, in order to determine what truly happened, and secondly, how the law applies to those facts. This application of the law on certain facts is what makes case law. Once a decision has been made on how the law applies to a particular set of facts, similar facts in later cases should be treated in the same way, as to make the system fairer and to provide a small amount of predictability, making it easier for people to abide by the law. The judges listen to the evidence and legal argument of the case, and then prepare a written decision as to which party wins the case, based on what they believe the facts were, and how the law applies to those facts. This decision is known as the judgement, which is split into two parts. The ratio decidendi is Latin for 'reason for deciding' and is the explanation of the legal principles on which the judge has made a decision; it is part of the judgement, known as binding precedent, and is what forms case law. ...read more.

Middle

The High Court can produce precedents for the lower courts, unlike the Crown Court who does not create binding precedent unless a High Court judge is sitting, and then it may be persuasive. The County Court, of the civil courts, and Magistrates Court, of the criminal courts, are the inferior courts. They are not bound by their own previous decisions and neither can make precedent, either binding or persuasive. The system of judicial precedent has some advantages and disadvantages. It provides an element of certainty, meaning litigants can assume like cases will be treated the same. It can respond to real situations, which are more based on theory and logic. The system is flexible, case law can make changes far more quickly that parliament can. However, there are thousands of decided cases that future cases can be based on, detracting from judicial precedents certainty. Judges could make illogical distinctions between cases, by making minute distinctions, again taking away the certainty of the system. There is dependence on chance, as important changes may not be made to the system as no new precedents can be created. Overall the system of Judicial Precedent is a fair one. ...read more.

Conclusion

It provides some degree of certainty upon which individuals can rely upon conduct of their affairs, as well as a basis for orderly development of legal rules. In Jindal Iron and Steel Co. Ltd v Islamic Solidarity Shipping Co. Jordan Inc (2004) the House of Lords was invited to overrule itself using the Practise Direction but it declined to overturn a 1957 precedent, because it had stood for 50 years, had worked and had not produced unfair results and an enormous number of transactions had taken place assuming it was the law. This is a perfect example of judges' creation limits. The first major use of the Direction was in the case of British Railways Board v Herrington (1972). In this case the House of Lords overruled a previous decision that stated that occupiers do not owe a duty of care to child trespassers. The House of Lords is reluctant to use the Practise Direction with regard to criminal cases, as it believes there is a special need for certainty in criminal cases. These means of creation possibilities within the system of judicial precedent provide a firm, legal support to the law, adding some flexibility where it is needed. Rebecca Turner Assignment 2.2 08/04/2009 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    AS LAW -JUDICIAL PRECEDENT

    4 star(s)

    A binding precedent is only created when the facts of the second case are sufficiently similar to the original case and the decisions was made by a court which is senior too, or in some cases the same level as, the court hearing the later case.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial Precedent

    3 star(s)

    Decisions of lower courts in the court hierarchy are also persuasive precedent. Also decisions of courts in other countries are persuasive precedent. In R v R (1991), the Court of Appeal and then the House of Lords followed a previous decision made by the Scottish Courts that a man can be guilty of raping his wife.

  1. explain judicial precedent

    This begins what can be lengthy and very expensive process. Normally only the rich or those backed by an organisation such as Union or professional will do this. Appeals where precedent is most likely to be set. An appeal from the county court of high court can go to the

  2. unit6 end of unit assignment civil litigation

    This case will probably be allocated to the fast track under Part 28,and the directions that would follow are standard directions concerning disclosure of documents, exchange of witness statements, and exchange of experts' reports), and a date for filing the Listing Questionnaire.

  1. AS LAW - Judicial Precedent

    Persuasive Precedent. These are not binding on the court, however a judge may consider such a precedent and decide that it is the correct principal to follow. On other words, he is persuaded that he should follow it. They can come from 1)

  2. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    Magistrates' courts: although these are essentially criminal courts, magistrates also have a civil jurisdiction, e.g. the making of affiliation orders and authorising the recovery of small debts. Their main civil jurisdiction is concerned with domestic proceedings and applications for matrimonial relief such as separation and maintenance orders- see the domestic proceedings and magistrates' court act 1978.

  1. Assess the constitutional significance of the decision of the House of Lords

    seen as 'antithetical to the instincts and traditions of the people of the United Kingdom.' The exceptional power to derogate from those rights also reflected British constitutional history. There have been times of great national emergency when habeas corpus has been suspended, (Napoleonic Wars, WWI and WWII).

  2. Juvenile Justice

    When the parliament reauthorises the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, it should press the states to end this barbaric practice. States classified ever larger numbers of young offenders as adults. Today, laws in more than 40 states authorize adult courts to try children as young as 14.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work