• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Juries are also used in certain civil cases such as defamation, slander and false imprisonment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Juries Juries are also used in certain civil cases such as defamation, slander and false imprisonment. When used in cases they have to decide weather the claimant has successfully proved his or her claim, they also decide the amount of money that is awarded in damages, this differs from the criminal court, where the only decision is whether the defendant is guilty or not. Jury are lay persons they are non-qualified in law. The jury system dates back to after the Norman Conquest in Britain and throughout centuries it has developed to become a fundamental part of the English legal system. The Magna-Charta recognised the persons rights to trial by the "Lawful judgement of his peers" this became a usual method of trying criminal cases the notable case of "Bushel 1670" established independent of the jury, in Bushels case where several of the juries refused to bring in a guilty verdict against Quakers who were charged with unlawful assembly they pleaded not guilty, the judge ordered to not accept the not guilty claim instead they were all fined and sent to prison they then appealed to the court ...read more.

Middle

*The high court in the Queen's Bench division for: Slander, Defamation and False Imprisonment. In the crown court they decide the verdict in serious criminal cases (murder, manslaughter). There are 12 jury members in panelled, the number can be reduced to 9 never lower than 9, they are required to bring a anonymous verdict but if after the period of time which the judge will decide they are not able to agree then the judge will give them position to bring a majority verdict this means a split of 11:1 or 10:2 if the jury is below 12 then the same circumstances still apply. When they give the verdict the spokes person for the jury (Foreman) must tell the judge what the split is. In the high court the jury role is different it must decide liability (wrongs and writes) they also have to decide damages which should be awarded. The 12 panel numbers and the case is brought before them would include defamation, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and allegations of fraud. ...read more.

Conclusion

However since 1977 more and more offences have moved to summary trial e.g. Criminal Damage where property must be worth more than �5000 for a case can be tried by jury. Selection of Jury The selection of jury is random from the electro register this is done to provide a cross-section of population. After various checks are carried out a further selection is made by the Court Usher who draws the name out of a hat, he draws at least 15 names that are eventually sworn in at trial. Those which are eligible: *Must be on electro roll *Must be at least eighteen *Must have lived in UK for five years Those on the roll and aged between sixty five and seventy have a choice to serve or not. Those aged over seventy do not qualify and some may be excused due to jobs or personal circumstances this group includes the judiciary workers (Barristers, Solicitors, Clerks), those involved in administration of justice (Police, Army, Solicitors, CPS and Sectaries involved with administration of justice), those who suffer from mental health, those on bail and anyone who has been in prison or received suspended prison sentence within the last ten years. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    This ensures that the quality and planning of advice given is of a better standard. Before this act there had been in some places no access to advice or any overall planning. It also ensures that between voluntary and private sectors there is a partnership to make sure that all are equally able to obtain Community Legal Service contracts.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    to a particular defendant and not all the facts relevant to the crime, with the result that verdicts may sometimes be based on an incomplete or even inaccurate picture of the events. Jurors may also argue that they receive little or no guidance to the nature of their duties.

  1. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    These cases have provided the Supreme Court to narrow the practical public policy implications of its original decision. We now have a situation where the court has created a complex public policy framework with many dimensions that both state and federal statutes must fall within.

  2. Describe how civil disputes can be resolved without going to court (this does not ...

    Where an employee has made a claim to an Employment Tribunal, a copy of the claim is sent to ACAS, and a conciliation officer will offer assistance in trying to resolve the dispute without the need of a full tribunal hearing.

  1. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    The Home Secretary is part of the Executive (government) and has links with the police forces. This was not right for a politician to be involved with legal matters. This is because they can have influences from the police, which wouldn't make it an un-fair case.

  2. Describe the use of the Practice Statement using the sources and other cases. [15 ...

    They had acquitted the defendant in the former case on the grounds that it was not an offence. However, in the latter case, the court upheld the defendant?s conviction for attempting to import class A drugs, as they explained that they had not interpreted the new law under the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 correctly.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    be piloted in cases where all parties consent?.[27] If the results of the pilot were to be successful then it is suggested that the Civil Procedure Rules are altered so that the system can be used in any appropriate cases.

  2. The English Court System

    Small claims court cases are resolved by trial, arbitration, settlement, or default judgment. Claims involve consumer purchases, landlord tenant relations, unpaid obligations and bills, and other types of property disputes. The jurisdictions of a small claim court are that that the small claim hearing is administrated by the court service at the local county court.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work