• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Juries are also used in certain civil cases such as defamation, slander and false imprisonment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Juries Juries are also used in certain civil cases such as defamation, slander and false imprisonment. When used in cases they have to decide weather the claimant has successfully proved his or her claim, they also decide the amount of money that is awarded in damages, this differs from the criminal court, where the only decision is whether the defendant is guilty or not. Jury are lay persons they are non-qualified in law. The jury system dates back to after the Norman Conquest in Britain and throughout centuries it has developed to become a fundamental part of the English legal system. The Magna-Charta recognised the persons rights to trial by the "Lawful judgement of his peers" this became a usual method of trying criminal cases the notable case of "Bushel 1670" established independent of the jury, in Bushels case where several of the juries refused to bring in a guilty verdict against Quakers who were charged with unlawful assembly they pleaded not guilty, the judge ordered to not accept the not guilty claim instead they were all fined and sent to prison they then appealed to the court ...read more.

Middle

*The high court in the Queen's Bench division for: Slander, Defamation and False Imprisonment. In the crown court they decide the verdict in serious criminal cases (murder, manslaughter). There are 12 jury members in panelled, the number can be reduced to 9 never lower than 9, they are required to bring a anonymous verdict but if after the period of time which the judge will decide they are not able to agree then the judge will give them position to bring a majority verdict this means a split of 11:1 or 10:2 if the jury is below 12 then the same circumstances still apply. When they give the verdict the spokes person for the jury (Foreman) must tell the judge what the split is. In the high court the jury role is different it must decide liability (wrongs and writes) they also have to decide damages which should be awarded. The 12 panel numbers and the case is brought before them would include defamation, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and allegations of fraud. ...read more.

Conclusion

However since 1977 more and more offences have moved to summary trial e.g. Criminal Damage where property must be worth more than �5000 for a case can be tried by jury. Selection of Jury The selection of jury is random from the electro register this is done to provide a cross-section of population. After various checks are carried out a further selection is made by the Court Usher who draws the name out of a hat, he draws at least 15 names that are eventually sworn in at trial. Those which are eligible: *Must be on electro roll *Must be at least eighteen *Must have lived in UK for five years Those on the roll and aged between sixty five and seventy have a choice to serve or not. Those aged over seventy do not qualify and some may be excused due to jobs or personal circumstances this group includes the judiciary workers (Barristers, Solicitors, Clerks), those involved in administration of justice (Police, Army, Solicitors, CPS and Sectaries involved with administration of justice), those who suffer from mental health, those on bail and anyone who has been in prison or received suspended prison sentence within the last ten years. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    those at the trial, the votes after Socrates' defence speech were very close, with a mere difference of eighty votes not on his side. When Socrates proposed "free maintenance by the state," and antagonised the jury, I began to see how he did not try his hardest to win the

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    to a particular defendant and not all the facts relevant to the crime, with the result that verdicts may sometimes be based on an incomplete or even inaccurate picture of the events. Jurors may also argue that they receive little or no guidance to the nature of their duties.

  1. THE ACCESS to JUSTICE ACT 1999 Civil Cases The state funding of civil cases ...

    if it is in the interests of justice to do so. 3) Eligibility There will continue to be both merit and means tests in civil cases with contributions being payable where appropriate. There is unlikely to be major changes in the means tests until greater funds are available (these though will have to come from savings within the scheme).

  2. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    are not familiar with the case, or with unrepresented defendants, it is wise for the defendant to have a copy of the judgment if they wish to have a McKenzie friend. Even if they are confident about their defence, it can be very useful to have someone with them to

  1. Is any act of statutory interpretation a arbitrary choice by a judge?

    The beginning of the 19th century saw the acceptance of the doctrine of Parliamentary Supremacy, and the relationship between the judiciary and the Parliament defined - Parliament is sovereign in making law and the role of the judge is to interpret.

  2. Describe the use of the Practice Statement using the sources and other cases. [15 ...

    In Stubbings V Webb, the 6 year limitation was instigated at the time of the report at aged 21 and the court refused a time extension. A V Hoare overruled this earlier case and decided that in certain exceptional circumstances the six year limitation could be extended since they realised

  1. a) Explain the function of the CPS [14] b) evalate the effectiveness of the ...

    the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure 1989 more reason to make change who was in charge of prosecution. The Phillips Commission 1978-1981 found there was no uniform system of prosecution in Wales and England which was essential for the consistency and fairness.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    but that does not instantly mean that the chances of the defendant being innocent are one in a million. When an expert witness provides evidence to a Jury in such a way it is very likely that they not question the reasoning that is given to them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work