• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Juries are also used in certain civil cases such as defamation, slander and false imprisonment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Juries Juries are also used in certain civil cases such as defamation, slander and false imprisonment. When used in cases they have to decide weather the claimant has successfully proved his or her claim, they also decide the amount of money that is awarded in damages, this differs from the criminal court, where the only decision is whether the defendant is guilty or not. Jury are lay persons they are non-qualified in law. The jury system dates back to after the Norman Conquest in Britain and throughout centuries it has developed to become a fundamental part of the English legal system. The Magna-Charta recognised the persons rights to trial by the "Lawful judgement of his peers" this became a usual method of trying criminal cases the notable case of "Bushel 1670" established independent of the jury, in Bushels case where several of the juries refused to bring in a guilty verdict against Quakers who were charged with unlawful assembly they pleaded not guilty, the judge ordered to not accept the not guilty claim instead they were all fined and sent to prison they then appealed to the court ...read more.

Middle

*The high court in the Queen's Bench division for: Slander, Defamation and False Imprisonment. In the crown court they decide the verdict in serious criminal cases (murder, manslaughter). There are 12 jury members in panelled, the number can be reduced to 9 never lower than 9, they are required to bring a anonymous verdict but if after the period of time which the judge will decide they are not able to agree then the judge will give them position to bring a majority verdict this means a split of 11:1 or 10:2 if the jury is below 12 then the same circumstances still apply. When they give the verdict the spokes person for the jury (Foreman) must tell the judge what the split is. In the high court the jury role is different it must decide liability (wrongs and writes) they also have to decide damages which should be awarded. The 12 panel numbers and the case is brought before them would include defamation, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and allegations of fraud. ...read more.

Conclusion

However since 1977 more and more offences have moved to summary trial e.g. Criminal Damage where property must be worth more than �5000 for a case can be tried by jury. Selection of Jury The selection of jury is random from the electro register this is done to provide a cross-section of population. After various checks are carried out a further selection is made by the Court Usher who draws the name out of a hat, he draws at least 15 names that are eventually sworn in at trial. Those which are eligible: *Must be on electro roll *Must be at least eighteen *Must have lived in UK for five years Those on the roll and aged between sixty five and seventy have a choice to serve or not. Those aged over seventy do not qualify and some may be excused due to jobs or personal circumstances this group includes the judiciary workers (Barristers, Solicitors, Clerks), those involved in administration of justice (Police, Army, Solicitors, CPS and Sectaries involved with administration of justice), those who suffer from mental health, those on bail and anyone who has been in prison or received suspended prison sentence within the last ten years. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    Because this event was so close to his trial, I believe they "executed Socrates, the sophist, because he was clearly responsible for the education of Critias, one of the thirty anti-democratic leaders", that this was the real reason Socrates was brought into court.

  2. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    If a person is a member of a trade union or motoring organisation they can usually get free legal advice. This service is good, as it will tend to be specialised towards certain areas of law that affects the person, for example if one has a car crash; motoring organisations

  1. Is any act of statutory interpretation a arbitrary choice by a judge?

    Given the indeterminacy of language, spatial limits, and inevitable development of technology and society the capacity of the draftsmen is limited in fulfilling all these functions. To fulfil this difficult task of interpretation, judges had to thus devise some approach or guidelines of statutory approach.

  2. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    Antitrust enforcement is not a tug of war in which the egos of either the plaintiffs or defendants need to be satisfied. The show of remorse or lack thereof by Microsoft executives could not possibly define the remedy. It is hard to believe that the judge would really find a different remedy appropriate if Microsoft executives simply showed public remorse.

  1. THE ACCESS to JUSTICE ACT 1999 Civil Cases The state funding of civil cases ...

    if it is in the interests of justice to do so. 3) Eligibility There will continue to be both merit and means tests in civil cases with contributions being payable where appropriate. There is unlikely to be major changes in the means tests until greater funds are available (these though will have to come from savings within the scheme).

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    This is not idea because an independent inquiry. Many cases involve allegations of wrong doing by the police and the danger could be that the police close ranks and protect each other, which could make the investigation unreliable. The Criminal Cases Review Commission made a good impact on miscarriages of

  1. The English Court System

    Its judgements can affect both member states and individuals, and it is the referee between member states, institutions and individuals in disputes relating to EU law. The structure of the European Court of Justice sites in Luxemburg and it settles? disputes between Member States over Community matters.

  2. a) Explain the function of the CPS [14] b) evalate the effectiveness of the ...

    This was because everyone should be treated the same, so a person who commits a crime should be dealt with the same if one was in Cardiff and the other in Bristol. And this was when the independant and expert body was established.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work