• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Juries are also used in certain civil cases such as defamation, slander and false imprisonment.

Extracts from this document...


Juries Juries are also used in certain civil cases such as defamation, slander and false imprisonment. When used in cases they have to decide weather the claimant has successfully proved his or her claim, they also decide the amount of money that is awarded in damages, this differs from the criminal court, where the only decision is whether the defendant is guilty or not. Jury are lay persons they are non-qualified in law. The jury system dates back to after the Norman Conquest in Britain and throughout centuries it has developed to become a fundamental part of the English legal system. The Magna-Charta recognised the persons rights to trial by the "Lawful judgement of his peers" this became a usual method of trying criminal cases the notable case of "Bushel 1670" established independent of the jury, in Bushels case where several of the juries refused to bring in a guilty verdict against Quakers who were charged with unlawful assembly they pleaded not guilty, the judge ordered to not accept the not guilty claim instead they were all fined and sent to prison they then appealed to the court ...read more.


*The high court in the Queen's Bench division for: Slander, Defamation and False Imprisonment. In the crown court they decide the verdict in serious criminal cases (murder, manslaughter). There are 12 jury members in panelled, the number can be reduced to 9 never lower than 9, they are required to bring a anonymous verdict but if after the period of time which the judge will decide they are not able to agree then the judge will give them position to bring a majority verdict this means a split of 11:1 or 10:2 if the jury is below 12 then the same circumstances still apply. When they give the verdict the spokes person for the jury (Foreman) must tell the judge what the split is. In the high court the jury role is different it must decide liability (wrongs and writes) they also have to decide damages which should be awarded. The 12 panel numbers and the case is brought before them would include defamation, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and allegations of fraud. ...read more.


However since 1977 more and more offences have moved to summary trial e.g. Criminal Damage where property must be worth more than �5000 for a case can be tried by jury. Selection of Jury The selection of jury is random from the electro register this is done to provide a cross-section of population. After various checks are carried out a further selection is made by the Court Usher who draws the name out of a hat, he draws at least 15 names that are eventually sworn in at trial. Those which are eligible: *Must be on electro roll *Must be at least eighteen *Must have lived in UK for five years Those on the roll and aged between sixty five and seventy have a choice to serve or not. Those aged over seventy do not qualify and some may be excused due to jobs or personal circumstances this group includes the judiciary workers (Barristers, Solicitors, Clerks), those involved in administration of justice (Police, Army, Solicitors, CPS and Sectaries involved with administration of justice), those who suffer from mental health, those on bail and anyone who has been in prison or received suspended prison sentence within the last ten years. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    The Department of Justice did not perform a cost-benefit analysis to show that conduct remedies were not sufficient and that a breakup was necessary. The government also failed to justify why it was ready to compromise a few weeks' earlier on behavioral remedies and now claimed that structural remedies were necessary.

  2. THE ACCESS to JUSTICE ACT 1999 Civil Cases The state funding of civil cases ...

    and thus it is hoped that it will release funds to support the other cases and thus give better coverage for the public. The 1999 Act does make provision for the Lord Chancellor to fund cases which otherwise would be excluded (as an exception)

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    He could have proclaimed 'freedom of speech,' proposed banishment, or a fine. Socrates also had a family, which would be without a father, and would lack provisions. But, it was said that Socrates hardly provided for his family, and left them poor, because of his need to prophesise.

  2. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    Citizens' Advice Bureaux's are available throughout the country and offer a substantional amount of free legal advice to everyone. This service is very useful for free legal advice as Citizens' Advice Bureaux's are placed within many very accessible areas around the country.

  1. Is any act of statutory interpretation a arbitrary choice by a judge?

    Traditionally, the courts had taken a 'literal approach' to statutory interpretation. The origin of its use is traceable from the words of Lord Tenterten CJ in Brandling v Barrington (1827). "It is much better and safer to rely on and abide by the plain words, although the Legislature might possibly

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    One way to describe the process in a trial is that ?In effect, the evidence was given through a discussion in which all of the experts, the advocates and the Court participated.?[25] This system means that the control of the debate is taken away from the Judge and the Lawyers and focuses instead upon the experts themselves.

  1. The English Court System

    The clients can only claim £5,000 for claims that don’t involve personal injuries and up to £1,000 for reimbursement that involve personal injuries. In addition, the claim has to be adjudicated by a judge in the court and court fees can be recovered.

  2. a) Explain the function of the CPS [14] b) evalate the effectiveness of the ...

    They appealed this until they finally had enough evidence to none of them had committed the crime. Therefore the 6 were finally freed in 1991 which was 16 years after they were convicted. That example shows clear evidence that the police were too close to the case and this gave

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work