• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Juries in NSW

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Juries in NSW Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. The role of the jury in NSW 3. The role of the jury in criminal and civil trials 4. Eligibility for jury service in NSW 5. Jury selection 6. The advantages and disadvantages of the jury system in NSW in 2005 7. Conclusion/recommendation 8. Bibliography The jury system plays a very important part in the running of the courts. The jury system is needed in both criminal and civil cases. There are advantages of the jury system as well as disadvantages. However, the jury system is still very important to the justice system. The role of the jury in NSW A jury is a group of people from the community with all sorts of backgrounds, beliefs, religions, education levels and ages, who listens to the evidence of the cases and helps the court to decide the outcome of the cases. Jury duty in NSW is a very important responsibility, providing a link between the justice system and the community. ...read more.

Middle

The plaintiff is the party that starts the case who is suing the other party, and the respondent is the party who is being sued by the plaintiff. The jury will listen to the arguments of both parties and come to a decision whether the respondent should pay or not to pay the plaintiff. If the jury decides that the respondent must pay the plaintiff, the magistrate or the judge will decide on the amount of money that should be paid to make up for the dept, injury, or damage. Eligibility for jury service in NSW Anyone in the community who is enrolled in the State electoral roll is eligible to participate in the jury service. The jury system gives people from the community a chance to participate in the justice system. Therefore people whose occupation involves around the government and legal system such as the governor, judge/magistrate, lawyer, police officer or prison officer cannot participate in jury service. ...read more.

Conclusion

- The decision is made by more than 1 person giving an opportunity for the accused to be not guilty - Jurors are not controlled by the government - Gives an opportunity to people from the community to participate in the justice system - The use of juries leaves the judges free from the pressure of deciding cases Disadvantages - All jurors must agree on the same verdict for the final decision-guilty or not guilty-even though they're against it - Some people are not allowed to participate - Some people may not understand the legal system - Juries cannot give reasons for the decision they made In conclusion, I think the jury system is an acceptable system because it plays an important part in the justice system. Not only it gives an opportunity to the community to participate in the justice system it gives an opportunity to the person accused to be judged equally by a number of people. Also the juries are independent and they are not controlled by the government, therefore it is a fair system. By: azntkfkd ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. 'Is the jury the

    Jury selection is seen to provide fairness and independence. Jurors are selected at random from the area local to the Crown Court. The random nature of the selection helps to guard against the risk of a jury panel being skewed in favour of one of the parties and to guard against the perception of this risk.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    fresh way, without knowing about the law and this makes for a fairer trial. On the other hand jury trials are seen to be expensive and time consuming as each point has to be explained carefully to the jury. On defence of the jurors, they only hear admissible evidence relevant

  1. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    The concept of just deserts has attracted criticism, as there is the suspicion that "the idea of desert cannot be distinguished from a principle of vengeance or the unappealing assertion that two wrongs somehow make a right." Although, there are two main advantages to desert based punishment.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    Moosenose: It is obvious to me that the community has become involved and has scrutinized her to the extent that the leaders in the community are able to make recommendations about what should be an appropriate sentence because of the special circumstances of the accused...The community therefore seems to

  1. Describe How The System Of Trial By Jury Operates

    Outline The Main Advantages And Disadvantages Of Using A Jury, Should The System Remain As It Is At Present? There are many advantages and disadvantages of using the jury system as it is at present, but many believe that an alternative to the jury system should be found.

  2. English legal system

    Sedley LJ then made a statement regarding section 77(6) of the County Courts Act 19849. The barrister for the appellants then went on to say that the breach in question in this case was very serious and it would be unreasonable to make an order in very exceptional cases.

  1. The Criminal Justice System: A Questionable Egalitarian Model

    For example, plea bargaining is a legal practice that is associated with the ability of prosecutors to take initiative in handling criminal cases. Plea bargaining occurs when a prosecutor negotiates with a defendant to accept a guilty plea for a lesser crime because it is uncertain that a costly jury

  2. U.S. newspaper can be sued in Canada.

    Paul Schabas, a Toronto lawyer representing the Post, said the ruling could set an important precedent. "It's an important issue because of the potential ramifications of foreign newspapers who publish, or make their material available on the Internet, as to whether they can be sued in other countries where they might not have expected to be sued."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work