• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Juries in NSW

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Juries in NSW Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. The role of the jury in NSW 3. The role of the jury in criminal and civil trials 4. Eligibility for jury service in NSW 5. Jury selection 6. The advantages and disadvantages of the jury system in NSW in 2005 7. Conclusion/recommendation 8. Bibliography The jury system plays a very important part in the running of the courts. The jury system is needed in both criminal and civil cases. There are advantages of the jury system as well as disadvantages. However, the jury system is still very important to the justice system. The role of the jury in NSW A jury is a group of people from the community with all sorts of backgrounds, beliefs, religions, education levels and ages, who listens to the evidence of the cases and helps the court to decide the outcome of the cases. Jury duty in NSW is a very important responsibility, providing a link between the justice system and the community. ...read more.

Middle

The plaintiff is the party that starts the case who is suing the other party, and the respondent is the party who is being sued by the plaintiff. The jury will listen to the arguments of both parties and come to a decision whether the respondent should pay or not to pay the plaintiff. If the jury decides that the respondent must pay the plaintiff, the magistrate or the judge will decide on the amount of money that should be paid to make up for the dept, injury, or damage. Eligibility for jury service in NSW Anyone in the community who is enrolled in the State electoral roll is eligible to participate in the jury service. The jury system gives people from the community a chance to participate in the justice system. Therefore people whose occupation involves around the government and legal system such as the governor, judge/magistrate, lawyer, police officer or prison officer cannot participate in jury service. ...read more.

Conclusion

- The decision is made by more than 1 person giving an opportunity for the accused to be not guilty - Jurors are not controlled by the government - Gives an opportunity to people from the community to participate in the justice system - The use of juries leaves the judges free from the pressure of deciding cases Disadvantages - All jurors must agree on the same verdict for the final decision-guilty or not guilty-even though they're against it - Some people are not allowed to participate - Some people may not understand the legal system - Juries cannot give reasons for the decision they made In conclusion, I think the jury system is an acceptable system because it plays an important part in the justice system. Not only it gives an opportunity to the community to participate in the justice system it gives an opportunity to the person accused to be judged equally by a number of people. Also the juries are independent and they are not controlled by the government, therefore it is a fair system. By: azntkfkd ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. 'Is the jury the

    Jury selection is seen to provide fairness and independence. Jurors are selected at random from the area local to the Crown Court. The random nature of the selection helps to guard against the risk of a jury panel being skewed in favour of one of the parties and to guard against the perception of this risk.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    fresh way, without knowing about the law and this makes for a fairer trial. On the other hand jury trials are seen to be expensive and time consuming as each point has to be explained carefully to the jury. On defence of the jurors, they only hear admissible evidence relevant

  1. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    The concept of just deserts has attracted criticism, as there is the suspicion that "the idea of desert cannot be distinguished from a principle of vengeance or the unappealing assertion that two wrongs somehow make a right." Although, there are two main advantages to desert based punishment.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    that an offender must satisfy to merely have access to a sentencing circle has led to accusations that the criteria for inclusion is overly restrictive and inconsistent among judges. Justices presiding over different jurisdictions have often relied on different elements for inclusion such as the Quebec judge who focuses exclusively

  1. Describe How The System Of Trial By Jury Operates

    returns to the back of the queue, although this is very rarely used. Juries are only used in about two percent of all cases heard within the United Kingdom every year. Jurors are selected to decide, based upon evidence if the defendant is guilty, or not guilty.

  2. English legal system

    They submitted that the grounds had been fully met via the conduct of the respondents and their associates and so in the interests of the public, SHAT would be better served re-letting the property. The appellants then brought forth the argument that an appeal judge could only interfere on a point of law in such a case as this.

  1. The Criminal Justice System: A Questionable Egalitarian Model

    For example, plea bargaining is a legal practice that is associated with the ability of prosecutors to take initiative in handling criminal cases. Plea bargaining occurs when a prosecutor negotiates with a defendant to accept a guilty plea for a lesser crime because it is uncertain that a costly jury

  2. U.S. newspaper can be sued in Canada.

    Paul Schabas, a Toronto lawyer representing the Post, said the ruling could set an important precedent. "It's an important issue because of the potential ramifications of foreign newspapers who publish, or make their material available on the Internet, as to whether they can be sued in other countries where they might not have expected to be sued."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work