• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Jury decision making: Discuss the effectiveness of jury decision making.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

JURY DECISION MAKING: DISCUSS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JURY DECISION MAKING The processes by which a jury in a criminal trail decide whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty can be affected by many case factors. Many of which have been psychologically researched, and proven to have an effect on the verdict given. The main factors that may affect the verdict given by the jury are; exposure to pre-trial publicity about the case, the use of eyewitnesses and the characteristics of the defendant, including the defendants race, attractiveness and accent. These case factors can sometimes, and sometimes not have an effect of the verdict given by jurors. Pre-trial publicity can have a major effect on the decision made by jurors. This can happen before and also can carry on during the trial. Exposure to details portrayed in the media can lead the juror to form biased decisions based on biased or even incorrect media details or they can form their own personal opinions about the case and/or the defendant. An example of this s the trial of footballer Lee Bowyer who was on trial for a racist attack. The media had a huge effect on this trail to the extent that it had to be dropped due to certain articles in newspapers which could have affected the jury's decision. ...read more.

Middle

Accents to are said to have an effect, for example (Mahoney & Dixon, 1997)found that having a 'brummie' accent was seen as having low status and therefore were more likely to be found guilty out of many accents. Black people with a 'brummie' accent were the most likely to be found guilty out of everyone, regardless of other case factors. Another additional case factor is the use of eyewitness testimony. Research in this field has been dominated by Loftus. Her 1974 study into jury decision making using eyewitnesses the results were as follows: summary one two three No eye witness Evidence from eyewitness, but not challenged Eyewitness evidence, but had poor eyesight 18% 72% 68% % of jurors that found defendant guilty The validity of this experiment can be questioned along with almost every other study involving jury decision making, because practically all use mock setups. The consequences of this are that demand characteristics could affect results. Also the aim of the experiment many also be figured out contributing to this factor. There is also added pressure for the eyewitness evidence to be accepted rather than rejected as the above shows, which all can lead to us questioning the reliability of these studies, and consequently the effectiveness of eyewitness testimony. ...read more.

Conclusion

Check on how others feel * In order to be liked, many people take a position to someone else but a little more extreme Furthermore groupthink can also affect the process of deliberation; this is when it becomes hard for the group to make rational decisions. Symptoms of groupthink include: * Overestimation of the group, including an illusion of invulnerability as well as a firm belief in the inherent morality of the group. * Narrow mindedness, which manifests itself in collective rationalisations and stereotypes of out-groups. * Pressures toward uniformity. This finds expression in self-censorship, an illusion of unanimity, and direct pressure on dissenters. The effects of these factors may be insidious in that group members are not aware of its operation. In conclusion there are many case factors that affect the way a jury comes out with a final verdict, some points such as pre trial media coverage and race seem to dominate the effectiveness of jury decision making, however almost all of it is backed up by studies that are not ecologically valid and so the true effect of these factors cannot be backed up 100%. There are many flaws in jury decision making which has today lead to it being used les and less worldwide. Altaf Korimbocus ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    'There is no power to create specifically a racial or gender balance or indeed imbalance, on a jury, other than by the random selection process itself' (Davies et al, 1998:209). It has been declared by many academics that random jury selection will never 'guarantee a representative jury' (Sanders & Young, 2000:564).

  2. Evaluate the effectiveness of domestic law in protecting children in Australia.

    However, whilst there are statutes and sanctions in place to protect children, weaknesses still exist within the legal system. Firstly, in order to prove an ADVO or an APVO has been breached, it must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, which places the onus of proving the breach to the ones

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    5 of the Juries Act 1974 to challenge to the whole jury on the basis that it has been chosen in an unrepresentative or biased way. For example In 1987 R v Fraser the defendant was of an ethnic minority background, but all the jurors were white.

  2. Penal Studies for Professional Practice

    Additionally, under the current release policy, those sentenced to less than 12 months are not included in the arrangements for Automatic Conditional Release (ACR) or Discretionary Conditional Release (DCR) (Criminal Justice Act 1991) and therefore leave prison free of licences or conditions (Burnett & Roberts 2004, p218).

  1. Examine recent trends in the use of custody in respect of juveniles over the ...

    Some restorative justice supporters argue that any forceful response to offenders can 'backfire'. Braithwaite (1999b) argues: "prisons are schools for crime...offenders become more deeply enmeshed in criminal subcultures" (Johnstone, 2002, p.91). The establishment of the Youth Justice Board under the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act promised a transformation in youth justice.

  2. Principles on which sentencing decisions are based

    of a particular offender as occurred in Freeman (1989), where a persistent pick pocket was sentenced to five years' imprisonment for a theft on the London Underground. It seems unlikely that such an approach would be permissible under the CJA - 1991 because of the desert-based approach.

  1. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    Roberts paints a picture of the court that leaves it with ultimate governmental power (the power to judge against the constitution) but by no means the most powerful branch of government. For if the court simply took out its set square to see if all the sides of a statute

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    theory the judge would rule it as inadmissible and the jury would not take it into account when making their verdict. The case of Sally Clark shows just how important it is that correct expert evidence is provided to the jury.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work