• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Justice requires that prosecutions should be undertaken by a body which is fully independent and impartial'. To what extent does the CPS fulfil this role?

Extracts from this document...


'Justice requires that prosecutions should be undertaken by a body which is fully independent and impartial'. To what extent does the CPS fulfil this role? Until 1986, criminal prosecutions were officially brought by private citizens rather than the state: in practice, however, most prosecutions were brought by the police, though technically they were prosecuting as private citizens. This issue had been brought to ahead in 1970, when the law reform group, JUSTICE, criticised the role of the police in the prosecution process. It argued that it was not in the interests of justice for the same body to be responsible for the two very different functions of investigation and prosecuting. This dual role prevented the prosecution from being independent and impartial: the police had become concerned with winning or losing, when the aim of the prosecution should be to discovery the truth. As a result, there was a real danger of the police intentionally withholding from the defence evidence that might make a conviction less likely. The report also highlighted the fact that public policy and the circumstances of the individual were relevant considerations in the decision to prosecute, and that the English legal system was unique in Europe in allowing the whole process, from interrogation to prosecution, to be ...read more.


It is clear that there are various benefits of the CPS, including the fact that it appears to promote a higher degree of consistency in prosecuting throughout England and Wales; the establishment of the guidelines laid down should mean that 'weak cases' are discontinued before they reach court, therefore saving vital time and money; and due to the fact that such prosecutions are brought independent of the police, civil liberties should be respected and upheld and justice should prevail. However, it is important to acknowledge that despite these advantages, the CPS ran into difficulties from the very beginning, mainly because the Home Office had underestimated the cost of the new service: the salaries offered were low, therefore making it impossible to find sufficient numbers of good lawyers, resulting in a reputation of incompetence and delay. A further issue which raised concern involved the delicate relationship between the police and the CPS: the police resented the new service and its demands for a higher standard of case preparation from police. While the CPS saw a high rate of discontinued cases as a success story, the police saw this as letting offenders off the hook. ...read more.


Where the police do refer a case for prosecution, the CPS makes up its mind on the basis of information with which it is provided - it cannot ask for further inquiries to be made. Given that the police, once satisfied that the suspect is guilty, will tend to look for evidence that supports this conclusion, and see any material that points in another direction as mistaken, or irrelevant, the file may point a very partial picture of the true situation. In my view, although it is clear that various amendments have been made to improve the CPS and the criminal justice system, I support the view advocated by Sir Robin Auld, who argues that the CPS should be involved in criminal cases at an earlier stage and that it should be the CPS and not the police (with the exception of very minor or urgent cases) who decides the appropriate charge. Therefore, in my view, whether or not the CPS (or as it might been renamed in the near future, the Public Prosecutions Service, under plans put forward by David Blunkett) will become totally impartial and independent depends to a large degree on what further alterations are made to enhance the CPS's position and influence, such as the recent establishment of the Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate. James Yates ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays


    Thus it could take place, for example, in a police van. No search involving exposure of intimate parts of the body may take place in a police van. The Code of Practice states that such searches must be by a police officer of your sex and must be in the

  2. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    The other rule states there should be an absence of arbitrary power. If an MP, local authority or public body is found to have exceeded their power the court may declare such an action ultra vires. This ruling has been used in Congreve v Home Office.

  1. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    This open approach would allow for easier regulation and the communication of more accurate information to the defendant. On academic who believes that plea bargains should be made public is James Morton. In his article he states that 'what is desirable, as with any form of justice, is that it

  2. Woolf Reforms

    A further change to the civil courts system is that the civil courts are in the process of introducing a new computer system; it is intended that the courts will move from a paper-based system to one where many communications take place electronically, for example statements and evidence being exchanged via email.

  1. To what extent is it still true to say that legal justice in England ...

    In France any one who seems able to provide evidence against a crime or civil matter is then taken into custody without the right to a lawyer or a phone call. Although the French use "inner certainty" and "proof beyond reasonable doubt" when dealing with criminal and civil matters, their

  2. Explain and comment on the main reforms made to the civil justice system after ...

    Once the case is filed in court, the defendant will be served with a notice within 14 days. They then have the same amount of time to respond as to whether they intend to defend the matter or settle out of court.

  1. Court proceedings.

    The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice 1993 has, however, recommended that the Contempt of Court Act 1981 be amended so that properly authorised research can be carried out into the way juries reach their verdicts. The secrecy of jury deliberations also has the result that alleged irregularities in the jury's discussions cannot be a ground for appeal.

  2. Court Structure

    An appeal may also be against a sentence served. Criminal appeals are heard in the following courts: 1. The Crown Court hears appeals from the Magistrates Court. Appeals take the form of a complete re-trial, with witnesses, usually before a Circuit Judge, with two to four magistrates but no jury.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work