• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Justice requires that prosecutions should be undertaken by a body which is fully independent and impartial'. To what extent does the CPS fulfil this role?

Extracts from this document...


'Justice requires that prosecutions should be undertaken by a body which is fully independent and impartial'. To what extent does the CPS fulfil this role? Until 1986, criminal prosecutions were officially brought by private citizens rather than the state: in practice, however, most prosecutions were brought by the police, though technically they were prosecuting as private citizens. This issue had been brought to ahead in 1970, when the law reform group, JUSTICE, criticised the role of the police in the prosecution process. It argued that it was not in the interests of justice for the same body to be responsible for the two very different functions of investigation and prosecuting. This dual role prevented the prosecution from being independent and impartial: the police had become concerned with winning or losing, when the aim of the prosecution should be to discovery the truth. As a result, there was a real danger of the police intentionally withholding from the defence evidence that might make a conviction less likely. The report also highlighted the fact that public policy and the circumstances of the individual were relevant considerations in the decision to prosecute, and that the English legal system was unique in Europe in allowing the whole process, from interrogation to prosecution, to be ...read more.


It is clear that there are various benefits of the CPS, including the fact that it appears to promote a higher degree of consistency in prosecuting throughout England and Wales; the establishment of the guidelines laid down should mean that 'weak cases' are discontinued before they reach court, therefore saving vital time and money; and due to the fact that such prosecutions are brought independent of the police, civil liberties should be respected and upheld and justice should prevail. However, it is important to acknowledge that despite these advantages, the CPS ran into difficulties from the very beginning, mainly because the Home Office had underestimated the cost of the new service: the salaries offered were low, therefore making it impossible to find sufficient numbers of good lawyers, resulting in a reputation of incompetence and delay. A further issue which raised concern involved the delicate relationship between the police and the CPS: the police resented the new service and its demands for a higher standard of case preparation from police. While the CPS saw a high rate of discontinued cases as a success story, the police saw this as letting offenders off the hook. ...read more.


Where the police do refer a case for prosecution, the CPS makes up its mind on the basis of information with which it is provided - it cannot ask for further inquiries to be made. Given that the police, once satisfied that the suspect is guilty, will tend to look for evidence that supports this conclusion, and see any material that points in another direction as mistaken, or irrelevant, the file may point a very partial picture of the true situation. In my view, although it is clear that various amendments have been made to improve the CPS and the criminal justice system, I support the view advocated by Sir Robin Auld, who argues that the CPS should be involved in criminal cases at an earlier stage and that it should be the CPS and not the police (with the exception of very minor or urgent cases) who decides the appropriate charge. Therefore, in my view, whether or not the CPS (or as it might been renamed in the near future, the Public Prosecutions Service, under plans put forward by David Blunkett) will become totally impartial and independent depends to a large degree on what further alterations are made to enhance the CPS's position and influence, such as the recent establishment of the Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate. James Yates ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays


    Thus it could take place, for example, in a police van. No search involving exposure of intimate parts of the body may take place in a police van. The Code of Practice states that such searches must be by a police officer of your sex and must be in the

  2. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    would be acted on, that he would not enforce his strict legal right; the equitable principle of promissory estoppel makes that promise binding on him. A further example can be found in Miller v Jackson, in which the local cricket ground had been bordered by a number of new houses, and the claimant bought one of them.

  1. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    His existential approach to black theology led him to the conclusion that one cannot become black and free until one wills one's blackness (which in itself is freedom). Like King, Cone finds in the writings of Paul Tillich an articulation of the human existential condition, placing human existence before essence, or alternatively his blackness (oppression)

  2. Woolf Reforms

    The procedure for starting an action is therefore undoubtedly simpler than under the old system. The pre-trial procedure is the most important area of the civil process, since few cases come to trial. In order to push parties into behaving reasonably during the pre-trial stage, Lord Woolf recommended the development

  1. Court Structure

    Indictable-only offence. Theses are serious crimes that must be tried in the Crown Court such as manslaughter, rape and treason. Defendants under 18 will generally be tried at a Youth Court but there are some exceptions. 3. Offences triable either way. These offences may be tried in either court.

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    these cases would have been; The application of the defendant against the conviction or length of sentence, then it would go onto the initial review by the CCRC to see how long it will take and screening of the case, it then goes to do 3 more things where they instruct public bodies to produce or preserve information (e.g.

  1. Why was the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) created?

    The police would however employ prosecuting solicitors that would help advise them on prosecutions and to conduct the cases in the Magistrates courts. Many of the police forces set up internal departments for these prosecuting solicitors within their organisations, who were then given the responsibility of presenting the cases in court.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    In fact the statement that they must have ?more opportunity of judging? than the ordinary person makes it seem that a person with just slightly more knowledge than the lay person would be qualified to stand as an expert. In practice it is highly unlikely that a person who has

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work