• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law and Ethics in tourism

Extracts from this document...


To discuss about if Mary is right or not in this case it is necessary to analyze the Package Travel Regulations. According to Holiday Law: The law relating to Travel and tourism book (Grant, D., Mason, S. 2007) a contract is an agreement that the law will enforce. Before the contract is made the two parties must provide each other with something of value. There must be actually an agreement, if the parties have not come to an agreement then there will be no contract. In a contract the consideration by the client would be the payment for the holiday and the consideration by the tour operator would be the provision of the holiday itself. The consideration needs not actually be exchanged for the contract to be binding it is sufficient that each party has promised to provide the consideration in exchange for the other promise. Before 1992 there was no such requirement for package holiday contract and it was possible to make contracts without putting them into writing. ...read more.


According to regulation 9 all the information must be in writing and comprehensible to the consumer. In our case there is no writing contract between Mary and John. According to the "Law of Contract" book (Chandler, A., Brown I 2007) an offer may generally be revoked at any time before it has been accepted, provided that the revocation is communicated to the offeree. This is so even though the offeror has indicated that he will keep his offer open for a specified time. Where, however, the offeror has contracted to keep his offer open, revocation of that offer will amount to a breach of the contract of option. An offer cannot be revoked after acceptance. An unaccepted offer will be revoked when the offeror (or his agent) communicates to the offeree, in any manner his unequivocal intention to revoke the offer either expressly or impliedly. However, an offer may also be revoked without such a direct communication by the offeror to the offeree: * Where an offer is made to all the world, it may be revoked by giving the same notoriety to the revocation as to the offer. ...read more.


In principle there is no legal commitment until a contract has been concluded by the acceptance of an offer and, up to that point, either party is free to change his mind and withdraw from the negotiations by (Offord v Davies, 1862) In our case according to the above there was an offer but no acceptance, so John could any time legally and ethically withdraw his offer because the requested act of the acceptance was never completed by Mary. As a conclusion made by the above references Mary is not right in this case, because she refused John's offer, saying that the package price was too high therefore they did not have any agreement. So John was free to sell the package to anyone else. Additionally Mary was wrong insisting on saying that they already had a contract, because a contract has to be written. John in this case is right because he acted according to the regulations and laws. The only mistake he made in my opinion is that he should have informed Mary that he is planning to sell the package to Tommy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    payment of the whole and the subsequent case of Re: Selectmore had also suggested as much. An exception to the doctrine of consideration comes in the form of estoppels such as estoppels by representation or known as common law estoppels, promissory estoppels and proprietary estoppels.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    * Invitation to the tender is not an offer Local Government Act 1988 s.4(2) Spencer v Harding There was an "offer to sell by tender". Held such notice was invitation to treat. * Specific date to summit is stated on the advertisement of tender is no consider as an offer but the party on bound to consider the tender.


    Some of these defects may be easily remedied - others clearly cannot be. Thus some potential breaches may be described as minor whereas others would be fundamental. This is the type of term that it is not sensible to classify either as a warranty or as a condition.

  2. Advising a Client : Contract Law

    In the present case terms one and two of the contract state that "B shall supply the processing equipment in accordance with A's specifications" and "A shall ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the specifications shall comply with the requirements of T".

  1. health and safety legislation and regulation

    * Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992: require employers to provide appropriate protective clothing and equipment for their employees. * Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998: require that equipment provided for use at work, including machinery, is safe.


    The confidential information (customers) was widely known so no way could the information be described as a trade secret. Faccenda had no one else to blame but himself for the failure to include restraints in his employment contract. Bluebell Apparel v Dickenson (1978)

  1. "There are occasions where terms are implied into contracts which have never been discussed ...

    claimant was able to recover the full price of the car from the seller. This is assumed to be common sense. We would not want to be unprotected if we had bought something that was then reclaimed and there was no remedy available to us.

  2. Aspects of Contract and Business Law Case Studies

    Alex received the letter and accepted the job. He posted an acceptance letter that night saying that he would be the manager and accept the job. However Andy wrote a letter saying how he was withdrawing his offer or revoking his offer because of the reasons stated and this letter was posted in the evening.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work