• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law and Justice

Extracts from this document...


What is meant by justice? Consider to what extent the law promotes justice. In England and Wales, a defendant is prosecuted under the Criminal Justice system for a crime. This is the clearest example that English law is based around the concept of justice. Lord Denning wrote: "If people are to feel a sense of obligation to the law, then the law must correspond as near as may be, to justice." This principle is essential to any legal system: if it fails to serve the public in a fair, just and reasonable way, it will not be observed. But what does justice mean, and to what degree, and by what methods is justice endorsed and promoted by the law. One of the fundamental tenets in which scholars have examined the law and justice is the theory of Natural law, primarily examined by Aristotle and St Thomas Aquinas. The BC Greek philosopher Aristotle, proposed the meaning of justice to be a method of allowing people to fulfil themselves as members of society. This principle came in two parts: distributive justice, the mechanism by which assets such as wealth and honours were allocated amongst a community, and corrective justice, the principles by which the state should correct unfairness and restore equality. ...read more.


Finally, there are the Rules of Evidence, which state that evidence used in court must have been obtained through fair means. For example, in the case of R v Watts, the conviction based upon previous convictions used as evidence was quashed, as the Court of Appeal judge that their prejudicial effect outweighed their value as evidence. These procedural rules promote justice, because they ensure to a reasonable degree that the vital processes which lead to a conviction, or a confirmation of civil liability, are fair, and free from prejudice which might invalidate them, and lead to miscarriages of justice. If the process by which law is executed is unjust from the start, then the outcome will always be so. Substantive justice involves several subcategories of the law. Firstly, rectifying mistakes as any system of law will have errors and miscarriages of justice which must have a method of repeal. The Prosecution have the chance to appeal a judges ruling on a point of law during a trial, and the Defence can appeal against the verdict or sentence afterwards. The Attorney-General can appeal against an unduly lenient sentence, and miscarriages such as those of the Birmingham Six and Guilford Four let to the establishment of the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which prevents further unfairness. ...read more.


None of this was properly assessed in court, leading to his unanimous conviction. The CCRC is now asking the CPS to consider reviewing similar cases where DNA is now available, and the defendant is still alive. In conclusion, the law does not promote justice as much as it should do, due to failures in a few key areas, such as sentencing, and various factors leading to the recent surge in miscarriages of justice. It should still be noted however that the legal system is by and large a fair mechanism for the execution of justice, with the Human Rights Act 1998 ensuring that it follows the ECHR, and with organisations such as the Criminal Cases Review Commission working to find and highlighted miscarriages of justice. The problem comes from the fact that a perfect justice can never be obtained, and there will never be a case in which all parties feel they have been treated in truly fair manner. This is why there comes a point where the courts must make a decision and abide by it, whilst balancing the interests of all parties involved, to achieve the best justice they can. It is easy in hindsight to condemn the courts for miscarriages of justice, without considering the stress that outside influences, and certainly the media, place on hasty convictions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Christopher Reading A2 Law ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and ...

    3 star(s)

    But, in actual fact they should be obeyed, as not doing so would result in social disorders taking place. The theory of utilitarianism takes a look at society as a whole nation, not an individual.

  2. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    Arbitration is similar to the court process in that each side puts forward their own argument and evidence, and, as mentioned above the arbitrator's decision is binding. There is no automatic right of appeal and, if a point of law is t issue, the case may not be suitable for hearing before an arbitrator Conciliation, Mediation and Negotiation (a)

  1. Critically evaluate the partial defence of Provocation.

    This principle was further developed in R v Ibrams (1982), where it was held that the existence of a 'cooling off period' between the act of provocation and the killing was evidence that the loss of self-control was not 'sudden and temporary'.

  2. Judicial Precedent

    the new one that reverses or overrules it is not a new law, nor a statement that the previous decision was bad law, but a declaration that the previous decision was 'not law', meaning it was the wrong answer. His view is that there is always one right answer, to be deduced from an objective study of precedent.

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    have little to do with the actual interests of the child, despite the constant 'so called' recognition that children are at the forefront of legal consideration. It appears that they are fundamentally concerned with doing away with the discrimination that unmarried fathers face as opposed to unmarried mothers.

  2. Law a2 notes

    Actus Reus D must: > Destroy or damage > Property > Belonging to another > Without Lawful Excuse Mens Rea > Direct Intention or recklessly Actus Reus Can be committed by act or omission Miller Meaning of damages/destroy Damages:

  1. AS LAW - Judicial Precedent

    These basic rules are essential if the doctrine of precedent is to operate at all. The other thing, which is essential, is that lower courts know all the legal reasoning behind decisions of the higher courts. They can only do this if those reasons are properly reported.

  2. The Nature of Law in Society

    Criminal laws are passed in order to ensure that every citizen knows the boundaries of acceptable conduct. For example it is a crime to break into a home because the act not only violates the privacy and safety of the home's occupants but it also shatters the collective sense that we are secure in our own homes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work