• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law and Justice Essay

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Law And Justice Justice is hard to define, as it means differently to different people. Generally, it means fairness and equality. The dictionary definition would be the upholding of rights and the punishments of wrongs, by law. There are different doctrines relating to justice. Rules of Natural Justice are meant to ensure that trials are fair and that both parties must have the opportunity to put their case forward and to have both sides of the story, an example of this is seen, in R v Bingham where defendant was convicted after a chair of magistrates said that he always believed a police officer in cases where evidence consisted of a policeman's word against defendant's. Aristotle taught that fairness is the basis of justice that we find in two forms. Distributive Justice regarding the allocation of assets where the aim of justice is to achieve proportion. ...read more.

Middle

Its functions should be limited to the basic needs such as protecting the individual against force, theft and fraud. The problem with this theory is that some can not afford training for a good job. Marx believed that the law is made to protect the middle class and their property from the working class. He thought everyone should be equal. Utilitarian's ( Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill) is based on a principle of utility, approving every action that increases human happiness and this approving every action that diminishes it. A law is just if it results in a not gain in happiness even at the expense of minorities. There are two types of justice. Formal or Procedural Justice which concerns the mechanism by which decisions are made.Concrete or Substantive Justice which is more concerned with the end result. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example Sally Clark whose babies died was finally acquitted of their murder as medical evidence had not been discovered and inappropriate conclusions had been drawn. Many of the reasons for the miscarriages of justice pre-date the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE). It widely recognised that ( PACE) provides safe guards during police questioning by strict Codes of Practice that is published in 38 languages. Criminal Cases Review Commission was set up in 1995. When miscarriages like Birmingham Six and Guilford Four had raised doubts about the appeal system. In my opinion, laws and justice will be up to debate and so many different views will clash with the law held. Many people will accept that justice should be the aim of any legal system. Nevertheless, some legal systems exist without any apparent notion of justice. One only has to think of the totalitarian regime in Iraq and Russia under Stalin where law was simply a means of repression not justice. ?? ?? ?? ?? Alexandra Popovici ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    The rule states that "no man is above the law" and the government itself is subject to law and is required to conduct its activities in accordance with established principles of law rather than arbitrary or discretionary means. However, this does not coincide with the doctrine of sovereignty of Parliament.

  2. Generally, one would assume that the whole purpose of law is to promote justice. ...

    Thus, the law in a philosophy view would promote justice. Followers of this idea would include Professor LL Fuller, Lord Devlin or against it like Lord Hart who link the idea of justice to that of morality (R v. Reeves 1964).

  1. Judical Creativity in Law

    Some follow the Literal Rule which states the words must be given their plain, ordinary, grammatical meaning. This can mean using the literal meaning of the words even if the result is not sensible. But the judges recognise that on some occasions other methods of interpreting the words were needed.

  2. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    The Department of Justice did not perform a cost-benefit analysis to show that conduct remedies were not sufficient and that a breakup was necessary. The government also failed to justify why it was ready to compromise a few weeks' earlier on behavioral remedies and now claimed that structural remedies were necessary.

  1. Criminal investigations and the criminal justice system

    of specialist services for ex-offenders including career advice, job search, training and work experience. Its my opinion that if their aim is to help these people stop re-offending in all this by tying to fit them in the society, its not far from believing that this part of the criminal

  2. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    Rawls himself says: "The combination of mutual disinterest and the veil of ignorance achieves the same purpose as benevolence. For this combination of conditions forces each person in the original position to take the good of others into account."2 A social contract can now be established, bearing in mind these a priori assumptions, which is built upon two principles.

  1. Juries Essay

    due to lack of capacity, these can be the mentally disordered, be resident in a hospital or similar institution, or regularly attend a medical practitioner for treatment. Other members of the population are also disqualified from being a juror, these are anyone who is on bail, anyone who has at

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    The evidence must be sufficiently reliable so that it can be used to make important decisions in cases. Although the expert may be highly reliable the evidence which they provide may not be, which clearly highlights the problems which can occur regardless whether the test for suitability is objective or subjective.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work