• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law and Justice Essay

Extracts from this document...


Law And Justice Justice is hard to define, as it means differently to different people. Generally, it means fairness and equality. The dictionary definition would be the upholding of rights and the punishments of wrongs, by law. There are different doctrines relating to justice. Rules of Natural Justice are meant to ensure that trials are fair and that both parties must have the opportunity to put their case forward and to have both sides of the story, an example of this is seen, in R v Bingham where defendant was convicted after a chair of magistrates said that he always believed a police officer in cases where evidence consisted of a policeman's word against defendant's. Aristotle taught that fairness is the basis of justice that we find in two forms. Distributive Justice regarding the allocation of assets where the aim of justice is to achieve proportion. ...read more.


Its functions should be limited to the basic needs such as protecting the individual against force, theft and fraud. The problem with this theory is that some can not afford training for a good job. Marx believed that the law is made to protect the middle class and their property from the working class. He thought everyone should be equal. Utilitarian's ( Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill) is based on a principle of utility, approving every action that increases human happiness and this approving every action that diminishes it. A law is just if it results in a not gain in happiness even at the expense of minorities. There are two types of justice. Formal or Procedural Justice which concerns the mechanism by which decisions are made.Concrete or Substantive Justice which is more concerned with the end result. ...read more.


For example Sally Clark whose babies died was finally acquitted of their murder as medical evidence had not been discovered and inappropriate conclusions had been drawn. Many of the reasons for the miscarriages of justice pre-date the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE). It widely recognised that ( PACE) provides safe guards during police questioning by strict Codes of Practice that is published in 38 languages. Criminal Cases Review Commission was set up in 1995. When miscarriages like Birmingham Six and Guilford Four had raised doubts about the appeal system. In my opinion, laws and justice will be up to debate and so many different views will clash with the law held. Many people will accept that justice should be the aim of any legal system. Nevertheless, some legal systems exist without any apparent notion of justice. One only has to think of the totalitarian regime in Iraq and Russia under Stalin where law was simply a means of repression not justice. ?? ?? ?? ?? Alexandra Popovici ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    as former head of state did not confer immunity from extradition proceedings based on allegations by a third country of torture and other violations of human rights. It later came to light that one of the judges had been a director of the charity Amnesty International that had been involved

  2. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    a trial takes place, the defendant is likely to be sentenced to a custodial sentence and if found guilty is likely to have a longer sentence. The last objection to a formalised plea bargaining system in terms of justice and equality is that we should not reward a defendant if they are actually guilty.

  1. R v David Smith. - ABH, criminal law

    Even when handcuffed, a third officer had to stop him lashing out. Both Officers needed medical attention once back at the station. This begs the question that if the defendant can do this to police officers, what could he do to an innocent and off-guard member of the public?

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    Incarceration also demoralizes aboriginal community values and is "seen as counterproductive, creating further obstacles to the restoration of balance and harmony after an anti- social act".13 The vital elements of reconciliation and restoration required by the aboriginal society cannot be achieved when the offender has been banished without resolution within the community having first been sought.

  1. Juries Essay

    due to lack of capacity, these can be the mentally disordered, be resident in a hospital or similar institution, or regularly attend a medical practitioner for treatment. Other members of the population are also disqualified from being a juror, these are anyone who is on bail, anyone who has at

  2. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    The following Antitrust Law applies to this case: 1. Section 2 of the Antitrust Acts "Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony."

  1. The Criminal Justice System: A Questionable Egalitarian Model

    From this perspective, as stated by Vago, this is because there is "a thin line between discretion and discrimination in discretionary law enforcement" (p. 161). In other words, many police officers might be inclined to regard particular suspects as being likely criminals, simply because they match a preconceived notion of the type of person most likely to commit crimes.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    One of these key issues highlighted is the fact that in theory the role of an expert witness? testimony is to convey their knowledge to a jury so that the jury can make an informed decision upon the evidence which the testimony relates.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work