• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law of Contract - Law 103

Extracts from this document...


Law of Contract Law 103 Assignment 1 ~ Seaburn Cycles Gemma Bolt 053047962 A contract is a legally binding enforceable agreement between two or more parties. Where an issue of a breach of contract arises in court, the court has to decide whether or not a contract has been made. To do this they must establish whether an offer has been made or whether it was simply an invitation to treat. If an offer has been made the courts must then look to establish whether there has been an acceptance. An offer is a statement of willingness by one party to enter into a contract on certain terms made with the intention that it shall become binding on acceptance. Whereas an invitation to treat is an expression of willingness to enter into negotiations which will eventually lead to a contract being formed. Acceptance is an unqualified expression of assent to the terms of the contract proposed by the offeror. The first thing to establish is whether an offer or an invitation to treat was made. In this situation, following the case of Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204, the initial advertisement in the newspaper would constitute an invitation to treat. ...read more.


David stated that if he did not hear anything from Jason he would assume he accepted the offer. However there is another rule in acceptance that acceptance of an offer will not be implied through mere silence. Also an offeror cannot impose a contractual obligation upon on offeree by stating that unless the offeree specifically rejects the offer, he will have accepted it. This was shown in the case of Felthouse v Bindley (1802) 11 CB (NS) 869. This means that Jason has not accepted the offer and is therefore not contractually bound to sell him the stock of bicycles. In this situation the only possible acceptance of the original offer would be by Martin meaning that Jason would only be contractually bound to sell Martin the stock of bicycles for �25,000. In addition to this Jason entered into a unilateral contract with Darren to carry out electrical work for �2,000. A unilateral contract is a contract whereby one party promises to pay the other a sum of money if that party completes a specified task. With a unilateral contract acceptance only takes place when the specified task has been fully completed. This was illustrated in the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. ...read more.


Due to this the contact would be void meaning Jason does not have to pay Peter the additional �500. This form of duress was illustrated in the case of North Ocean Shipping Co v Hyundai Construction Co (The Atlantic Baron) [1979] QB 705. Jason did however agree to the counter offer which would normally create a binding contract. However because the agreement was obtained as a result of duress the contact would not be valid meaning that Jason would not be contractually bound to Peter. In conclusion Jason would only be contractually bound to sell his stock of bicycles to Martin and pay �2,000 to Darren for completing all electrical work. Text Books 1. McKendrick, P. (2005) Contract Law) 6th edition, Hampshire, Palgrave, Macmillan Law Masters, pp32 - 53, 356 - 362. Case List 1. Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl [1983] 2 AC 34 2. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] 1 QB 256 3. Entores v Miles Far East Corp. [1955] 2 QB 327 4. Felthouse v Bindley (1802) 11 CB (NS) 869 5. Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334 6. North Ocean Shipping Co v Hyundai Construction Co (The Atlantic Baron) [1979] QB 705 7. Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204 Articles 1. Article 19 of the Vienna Convention ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    by the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company to any person who contract the increasing epidemic of influenza, colds, or any disease caused by taking cold, after having used the ball three times daily for two weeks according to the printed direction supplied with each ball.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    In this Assignment I am going to describe the requirements of a valid contract ...

    3 star(s)

    Any material used or goods supplied in providing the service must be of satisfactory quality. The Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that requires traders to provide services to a proper standard of workmanship.

  1. Entores ltd V. Miles Far East Corperation [1955] 2 QB 327(CA)

    If for any reason the offeror did not get an acceptance, hence there is no contract. However, if the offeree taps out the message again and the offeror receives it then there is a contract. Overall Lord Birkett and Lord Parker have agreed with the decision above.

  2. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    If the analogy of The Brimmes 1975 case is used to then the tender submitted by Mintex would have become effective at 6 p.m. on the 9th of September, if this was normal business hours for Astonia, if not the tender would have become effective at the start of business the next day.

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    The conviction was quashed as it was said that the advertisement was an invitation to treat. It is clear that when it comes to revocation, clearer authority is needed on the issue of revocation in unilateral contracts. Later on Sheena finds a pair of shoes labelled � 25.


    The provisions contained within s.12-15 relating to title, sale by description, satisfactory quality, fitness for purpose and sale by sample are implied into every contract for the sale of goods where the seller sells in the course of business. (c)

  1. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    There is often a small distinction between a counter-offer and a request for information. The former terminates the offer while the latter leaves the offer open for acceptance; it is unlikely that a party to negotiations unless a commercial lawyer would be able to draw such a fine distinction between the two, but the difference is crucial.

  2. Aspects of Contract and Business Law Case Studies

    price and therefore Ben had a right to reject the price offered. There was no contract made between the two parties because Ben didn?t accept the bid offer and therefore Tracy cannot take Ben to court because there wasn?t a binding contract formed between the two parties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work