• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law reforms occurs when there is a change in law to meet a change in need in society, Describe ways this is done.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Law reforms occurs when there is a change in law to meet a change in need in the socirty, Various ways to do this. Judicial change is when courts perform law reform. For example, in the case of RvR the courts departed from common law and held that rape within marriage amounts to a crime. This contributed to a change in society for the position of women. According to Norman Marsh Reform for the UK, reforms like this rarely happen. There is no state funded systematic process to bring about law reform. It depends on citizens to bring a case to courts and relies on individual?s time need and expense. Hence it is haphazard as it is not in order, and not priorities. The court cannot commission research on the effects of the possible changes in law, they can only decide on how the cases are presented. Precedent also means that it is rigid and very difficult to depart from previous decision. ...read more.


It is unlikely that the Bill would not go through. These problems hinder the effectiveness of the Parliament. Other major reforms can also be made by Law Commission, which is a permanent body set up in 1965, which consists of a Chairman(High court judge), A Queen Counsel with expertise in criminal law, a solicitor with expertise in land law and equity and 2 legal academics. Their job is to remove anomalies, repeal consolidate simplify and modernize law. They handle projects recommended by Lord Chancellor, government department or where they think needs reforms. They usually first identify the defects in the law and examine foreign legal systems to see how they deal with it. Then a consultation paper is released which contains shortcomings of the present system, possible ways to reform and opinions to reform. A final document is sent to the government department to decide whether to approve or reject proposals and passes any necessary bills to parliament. ...read more.


For example the Royal Commission of the Criminal Procedure stated that under the PACE, individuals are entitled to free legal advice. However, lack of legal funding frustrated such aims. Another problem is waste of expertise as the Royal Commission is disbanded after the proposal is made. There is no one single ministry that is responsible for law reform. Other agencies that participate in law reforms are pressure groups such as AGE UK, Shelter, Law Society and JUSTICE. Their effectiveness is based on size persistence and power. Public opinions also contribute to law reforms- people may write to their MPs or newspapers. There should be a single ministry that is responsible for law reforms. There would be higher level of expertise and accountability developed over time. It should include non-legal and legal experts for different perspectives and the government should be required to take into account proposals. The current agencies of law reform in England and Wales are effective in some ways but this effectiveness in hindered by many problems. It would be better to have one single ministry responsible for law reform. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Common Law and Equity

    5 star(s)

    The last equitable remedy is rescission, if one party to a contract wish to cancel a contract they may apply for the agreement to be rescinded. This will be like the contract never existed. The range of injunctions available was extended in the 1970's and two new important remedies were created.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and ...

    3 star(s)

    For example, when a defendant is being interviewed within a police interview room, whatever activities are carried out within the room are stated to the tape. So, if someone came in showing evidence, it will be stated who came in and what evidence was found.

  1. To what extent do you think these aims have been (or will be) facilitated ...

    1 Property: Everything which is the subject of ownership; the highest right a man can have to anything; describes the rights one possesses - Cavendish Law cards Series LAND LAW 2 'It differs from other forms of property in that it is both permanent and indestructible' LAND LAW Mark Thompson p.

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    the family unit has already broken down, and he his not living with the child. It might be instead to recognise the role a father can play in a child's life, regardless of the state of the parental relationship.24 There are a variety of issues surrounding the concept of parental

  1. Sources of Law

    The hierarchy of the civil courts is as follows: European Court of Justice, House of Lords, Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Divisional Courts, High Court, County Court, and finally Magistrates' Court at the lowest level which must abide by the rules set by all of the above.

  2. AS LAW - Judicial Precedent

    Operation of the Doctrine of Precedent 1. Every court is bound by a court above it in the hierarchy. 2. In general, appellate (appeal) courts are bound by their own private decisions. (But there are exceptions to this rule, especially for the House of Lords since the 1966 Practice Statement.)

  1. Statutory Interpretation

    This has often been deemed to have given judges the maximum power possible. Following the discussions on s.4, the question does arise; does s.4 undermine the supremacy of the Parliament? The answer is a resounding 'no'. Under the provisions of s.4 judges may only deem an Act of Parliament to

  2. Statutory interpretation

    A final example of the mischief rule in practice is shown in the case (Tesco v Brent LBC, 1993). In this case a 14yr old was sold a video with an '18' classification and so the supermarket chain was charged for an offence under the Video recordings Act 1984.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work