• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Title: LAW REPORT on Macgregor's case The Problem Peter booked a room for a week at MacGregor's Hotel. At the reception desk, where he made the booking, was a notice in the form laid down by the hotel Proprietors Act 1956 limiting the hotel's liability for loss of, or damage to guest's property. Peter asked the receptionist to look after his expensive Olympus camera but she refused saying that there was no room in the hotel safe. On the second night of his stay he invited his friend Beatrice to dinner in the hotel's restaurant. At dinner, without consulting Beatrice, Peter ordered Helford oysters for both of them. The oysters that were served to them in fact came from Whitstable and several of them were bad. Later in the meal Beatrice, already beginning to feel the effects of the oysters, left table in search of a lavatory. On her way there, suddenly overcome by dizziness, she tripped on a piece of torn stair carpet and fell heavily, breaking her arm. The meal was abandoned and Peter returned to his room hungry and bad tempered only to discover that his Olympus camera had been stolen. Being the defence advice MacGregor about his legal liabilities. Introduction This brief advises MacGregor as to the legal liabilities he faces as a consequence of the incidents as detailed above. It is advised that if this matter proceeds to court, which is likely, then Beatrice's personal injury case may be heard either at the County Court, probably under the Fast Track (personal injury claim value �1000-�15,000) ...read more.

Middle

and no plea in mitigation of contributory negligence (Sayers v Harlow Urban District Council (1958)7) would be successful in relation to the fact that Beatrice left the room in a dizzy condition. McGregor hotel took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of such an offence. According to Food and Safety act 1990 section 21 subsection 3A, states that: 'The ommission of the offence was due to an act or default of another person who was not under his control or to reliance on information supplied by such a person' Regarding to that I will give an example of case Tesco Supermarkets v Nattrass 1972. To prove that MacGregor hotel is not responsible for the wrong description of the oysters. Tesco Supermarkets v Nattrass 1972. Where Tesco relied upon the defence of the 'act or omission of another person'. Tesco had a special offer on washing powder, with a poster relating to the offer displayed in the store. They ran out of the specially marked low price packets but failed to remove the poster when higher priced stock was put on the shelves and someone was overcharged. Tesco is a big company all over the UK with thousands of employees. The have managers responsible for different stores. The store manager should check the pricing and on this occasion he failed to follow their instructions. As we know McGregor is a big hotel chain all over the UK with about 1500 employees. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, in this case Beatrice can not be blamed for carelessness because the food she had from the hotel caused her dizziness on her way to lavatory. This Act makes it clear that even though Beatrice did not make the contract with the MacGregor's restaurant, the contract was made for her benefit too. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 section 7 states that the liability of a person by virtue of this part to a person who has suffered damages caused wholly or partly by a defect in a product. Now, we can support our case with one old similar case like Donoghue v Stevenson 1993. In this case a person bought a bottle of ginger beer from the retailer and passed it on the defendant, Ms Donoghue, who drank it and became seriously ill only to find out later that the bottle contained a partially decomposed snail. The defendant went on to pursue a legal action against the manufacturer of the ginger beer. Her claim was successful on the basis that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to all those who might be expected to consume their products. Beatrice is a secretary with income of �25,000 per year. The reason why she is unable to work is the negligence of the hotel occupiers. Her medical report states that she will not be able to work for the next 3 months. The total expenses she will be suffering and its interest is �6500. Additional expenses such as cost of travel to receive medical treatment, cost of medication etc. will come extra. Considering the above facts Beatrice should receive the maximum compensation from the MacGregor Hotel. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

A good essay, written very well and quite comprehensively. Focus is duly given to core issues such as exclusion of contractual terms and occupiers' liability.

4 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 18/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    and relied on by parties in legal proceeding before national courts.7 This was confirmed in Van Gend en Loos8 which was a matter for European law to determine itself being "binding on all the member state, no matter what their national legal systems would provide"9 this shows the superiority of

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Law and Fault

    4 star(s)

    This is evidence of the law ensuring that only those who really are to blame for a crime are punished. The actus reus also includes omissions which is a failure to act. For an omission to result in an actus reus, there must be a duty for the defendant to act.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how judges are appointed and how the courts and legal service act 1990 ...

    3 star(s)

    The main overall role of the legal service act was to give equal powers to the solicitors and barristers. Other examples of changes in training of judges has been the implementation of Children's Act 1989, and the Human Rights Act 1998.

  2. Before 2005 there were three main problems with the appointment procedures which is the ...

    The Minister cannot choose somebody who has not been recommended to him or her by the Commission. He or she is, however able to ask for a candidate who is not initially recommended by the Commission to be reconsidered, and can refuse the appointment recommend and ask for a new name to be put forward.

  1. Evaluate police powers of arrest, detention and search.

    best be achieved by abolishing the distinction between arrestable and non-arrestable offences. This policy was enacted in PACE s.24A. The amended legislation extends police powers of arrest for any offence in the following terms: A constable may arrest without a warrant: anyone who is about to commit an offence; anyone

  2. Free essay

    Legal personnel

    Although the GDL is for students who already have a degree, there are also other alternatives such as the Common Professional exam (CPE); for mature students with achievements in other fields. Although this course is not recommended by the Law society, as they would rather students gain access into the

  1. Explain (a) the process of selecting magistrates and (b) the work that they carry ...

    They must be between the ages of 18 and 65. The person has to be of reasonably good character, with personal integrity. The person has to have a reasonable level of common sense. They must have the ability to weigh evidence and reach a reasoned decision..

  2. Explain the work & training of barristers & solicitors

    Around half of the 900 pupils each year receive funding of �6000 for their 12-month pupilage from their cambers, but for the rest, finance can be a major obstacle. Pupils may take on cases in their second six months, but the fees for that work are generally not high, and are not paid until some time after the works done.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work