• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Legal Studies Assess Two

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Case 1: R v Milat (1996) 87 A Crim R 446). 1. Author and date of the article. Brett Cox, 03-09-2008. 2. Facts of the case. Ivan Milat was arrested in May 1994 for the murder of seven people. All seven were backpackers, whose bodies were found in Belanglo State Forrest. According to the evidence, Milat murdered his victims between 1989 and 1992. Because all of his victims were backpackers, the media called the case the case of the "backpacker murders". The key reason that Milat was convicted was that one of his potential victims, Paul Onions had gotten away before Milat could kill him, and so Onions was able to identify Milat as his attacker. Milat's trial began in March 1996 and finished four months later in July. 3. Area of law. The area of law in this case is criminal law. McGregor says that criminal law deals with acts or omissions (failures to act) committed against the entire community. Even though a criminal offence may only be against one individual, they have a negative effect on the whole of society. In criminal law cases, the prosecution must prove that the defendant is guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" which means that there must be no reasonable doubt that the alleged offender did not commit the crime. ...read more.

Middle

Because of this he argued that his common law right to legal representation had been breached. This right was established in Dietrich v The Queen, and Milat relied on this case in his appeal. However, his appeal was dismissed by the court because they said that Milat could only be successful if the quality of his legal representation was so low that he would have been better off without it. The court said that the quality of legal representation provided by Milat's defence lawyer Terry Martin's was adequate. 2. Appeal to the High Court of Australia in 2004. Milat appealed this time on the grounds that the first judge, Justice Hunt, had let the prosecution put a case to the jury which was not supported by its own witness. This appeal was also dismissed, with Justice McHugh saying that the appeal was brought out of time. Even though Milat still claims that he is innocent, he has never appealed on that ground. This could be because of the amount of evidence against Milat that suggests that he did murder the seven people found in the forest. As Justice McClelland said, "the material provided by the applicant does not raise a doubt or question about his guilt". In the article by Brett Cox, it also states that "there is overwhelming evidence that Milat was the murderer, and they are the simple facts of the case". ...read more.

Conclusion

In the trial, Justice Heydon even asked the question, "how can the birth of a healthy child, or any child for that matter, be considered an injury rather than a blessing?". In the article by Virginia Bourke, Justice Heydon is also quoted as saying "human life is invaluable in the sense that it is incapable of valuation". I do not think that it is fair for the child to grow up knowing that he was unwanted. However, one of the judges in the majority, Justice Kirby said that "it is difficult to accept that children in today's age learning such facts would not realise, if explained to them, that the claim was brought simply for the economic consequences of medical negligence". Even if this is true, I still think that the outcome of this case was unjust. Students at university who are studying medicine may even decide that they do not want to specialise in fertility because of the risk that they will be sued like Dr Cattanach. 8. Whether there will be an appeal. As already mentioned, this case was first heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The defendant, Dr Cattanach then appealed to the High Court of Australia, where his appeal was dismissed. No further appeals can be made by Dr Cattanach because the High Court is the last court of appeal. Once an appeal is dismissed from the High Court, the case is completely finished. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    contract the terms of another contract between the parties, or a draft agreement between them23 - contract between one of them and a third party Brogden v MRC (1877) B supplied coal to MRC for many years without an agreement.

  2. e-commerce legal issues

    Therefore, firstly, the relationship between sellers and buyers are created through online sales contract. Secondly, eBay as online service provider provides services to eBay's users and regulate their acts. 1) The legal relationship between eBay buyer and seller Under English law, the formation of a contract requires four elements: offer, acceptance, consideration and an intention to create legal relations.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The plaintiff took his ticket from a machine at the entrance. The ticket had some small print stating that it was issued subject to conditions displayed on the premises. Within the car park was a notice displaying the conditions, one of which was that the garage would not be liable for any injury to the customer.

  2. DIFFEERENT AREAS OF CONTRACT LAW

    Case study three This case study will go under remedies for breach of contract and limitation of actions. A breach means that one of the parties has broken the agreement in some way. Or failed to have carried out their side of the bargain.

  1. Conveyancing: Practice and Procedure.

    They will also give details of any restrictive covenants or easements relating to the property. A restrictive covenant is where the use of the property is restricted in some way i.e. The owner may not use the property as a place of business or is not allowed to park a caravan outside the front of the property.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    Offeror and offeree An offeror is the negotiating because he controls the terms and conditions of the offer i.e. he controls the price and how long the offer stands. An offeree is the person who is prepared to accept the offer.

  1. Several tests have been developed to identify and categorise different types of workers.

    Also that there must be some element of control by the employer, and finally that the other terms of the contract must not be inconsistent with the existence of a contract of employment. The fact that the driver could, and did employ a substitute driver was crucial in deciding that they were self-employed haulage contractors.

  2. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    common intention)12 to share ownership by way of constructive trust. Also, he was suffered to his detriment in some way by contributing to the purchase of property. Then, constructive trust can so operate to redress the limitation of financial contribution to provide remedies for wife or unmarried partner contributed in non-financial activities, i.e.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work