• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Legal Studies Assess Two

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Case 1: R v Milat (1996) 87 A Crim R 446). 1. Author and date of the article. Brett Cox, 03-09-2008. 2. Facts of the case. Ivan Milat was arrested in May 1994 for the murder of seven people. All seven were backpackers, whose bodies were found in Belanglo State Forrest. According to the evidence, Milat murdered his victims between 1989 and 1992. Because all of his victims were backpackers, the media called the case the case of the "backpacker murders". The key reason that Milat was convicted was that one of his potential victims, Paul Onions had gotten away before Milat could kill him, and so Onions was able to identify Milat as his attacker. Milat's trial began in March 1996 and finished four months later in July. 3. Area of law. The area of law in this case is criminal law. McGregor says that criminal law deals with acts or omissions (failures to act) committed against the entire community. Even though a criminal offence may only be against one individual, they have a negative effect on the whole of society. In criminal law cases, the prosecution must prove that the defendant is guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" which means that there must be no reasonable doubt that the alleged offender did not commit the crime. ...read more.

Middle

Because of this he argued that his common law right to legal representation had been breached. This right was established in Dietrich v The Queen, and Milat relied on this case in his appeal. However, his appeal was dismissed by the court because they said that Milat could only be successful if the quality of his legal representation was so low that he would have been better off without it. The court said that the quality of legal representation provided by Milat's defence lawyer Terry Martin's was adequate. 2. Appeal to the High Court of Australia in 2004. Milat appealed this time on the grounds that the first judge, Justice Hunt, had let the prosecution put a case to the jury which was not supported by its own witness. This appeal was also dismissed, with Justice McHugh saying that the appeal was brought out of time. Even though Milat still claims that he is innocent, he has never appealed on that ground. This could be because of the amount of evidence against Milat that suggests that he did murder the seven people found in the forest. As Justice McClelland said, "the material provided by the applicant does not raise a doubt or question about his guilt". In the article by Brett Cox, it also states that "there is overwhelming evidence that Milat was the murderer, and they are the simple facts of the case". ...read more.

Conclusion

In the trial, Justice Heydon even asked the question, "how can the birth of a healthy child, or any child for that matter, be considered an injury rather than a blessing?". In the article by Virginia Bourke, Justice Heydon is also quoted as saying "human life is invaluable in the sense that it is incapable of valuation". I do not think that it is fair for the child to grow up knowing that he was unwanted. However, one of the judges in the majority, Justice Kirby said that "it is difficult to accept that children in today's age learning such facts would not realise, if explained to them, that the claim was brought simply for the economic consequences of medical negligence". Even if this is true, I still think that the outcome of this case was unjust. Students at university who are studying medicine may even decide that they do not want to specialise in fertility because of the risk that they will be sued like Dr Cattanach. 8. Whether there will be an appeal. As already mentioned, this case was first heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The defendant, Dr Cattanach then appealed to the High Court of Australia, where his appeal was dismissed. No further appeals can be made by Dr Cattanach because the High Court is the last court of appeal. Once an appeal is dismissed from the High Court, the case is completely finished. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    .Such a replies is not an acceptance but a counter-offer24 which the original offeror can accept or reject Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl (1983) The buyers, an English company, by a telex, sent from London to Vienna, accepted the terms of sale offered by the sellers, an Austrian company.

  2. e-commerce legal issues

    Therefore, firstly, the relationship between sellers and buyers are created through online sales contract. Secondly, eBay as online service provider provides services to eBay's users and regulate their acts. 1) The legal relationship between eBay buyer and seller Under English law, the formation of a contract requires four elements: offer, acceptance, consideration and an intention to create legal relations.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The defendant tried to rely on exclusions clauses, which were found on a risk note that customers usually signed. On this occasion, this had not happened. The clauses were also on notices both inside and outsider the defendant's offices at the pier.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    being unable to enter into a binding contract because they might not be in the position to fully understand the agreement. People under the age of 18 (minors) can enter into a contract with another party but it has to be on certain terms.

  1. DIFFEERENT AREAS OF CONTRACT LAW

    of restraint is unreasonable - UK, EU and global is far too much * The restraint is not in the public interest - can restrict consumer choice If it may be seen as anti competitive and abusive it can be removed or severed as null or void, it also may

  2. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    Clearly, the exceptional conducts apart from traditional domestic activities will give rise to an inference of common intention as (a) substantial contribution to purchase price17, and (b) non-financial contribution18, i.e. housekeeping expense as indirect contribution to enable mortgage to be paid.

  1. Conveyancing: Practice and Procedure.

    Office copies of the title to the property. These are documents obtained from the Land Registry, which show an Ordnance Survey map of the area and the boundaries of the property to be sold. They will also give a description of the property, and details of the registered owner, and of any charges against the property, such as mortgages.

  2. Several tests have been developed to identify and categorise different types of workers.

    Also that there must be some element of control by the employer, and finally that the other terms of the contract must not be inconsistent with the existence of a contract of employment. The fact that the driver could, and did employ a substitute driver was crucial in deciding that they were self-employed haulage contractors.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work