• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Mandatory Minimums: A National Injustice

Extracts from this document...


Brittany Kuzman Sister Marie Hubert Kealy Composition II 22 April 2005 Mandatory Minimums: A National Injustice Mandatory minimum drug sentencing is legislation passed by Congress in 1986 to create harsher punishments for drug offenders. These laws were created at a time when drug use was beginning to rise dramatically. This type of sentencing was meant to impose harsh, excessive sentences on any type of drug offense, despite other circumstances. While these laws seem good in theory, they were not well thought out. The creators and supporters did not consider the negative consequences of these strict laws. The injustices of federal mandatory minimum sentences have been present for years in the United States justice system. These laws are costly, unjust and excessive in our society. First, the most obvious effect of mandatory minimums is what it costs our nation financially. The sentences of drug offenders are now extremely long, and keeping large numbers of people in jail for long amounts of time is very costly. The U.S. taxpayers are the ones suffering because they are the ones that are forced to pay for these increasing costs. ...read more.


Even though these facts and statistics are very shocking it is still difficult to really understand these laws' detrimental effects. The only way to truly comprehend the terrible effects is to know how it affects real people in real life situations. One example is Bill Stonner, a real estate developer in New York. He is currently serving ten years in prison, a mandatory minimum sentence for growing marijuana. His wife, Susan, knows that what her husband did was wrong and punishable, but the sentencing was not fair. She states, "But 10 years is a little excessive. It was his first offense. He had no prior records...now we have two children that miss their father terribly (Marks 1). This is just one of many examples of a family drastically affected by the extreme sentencing brought about by mandatory minimums. While Bill Stonner was in the wrong for growing drugs, he did not deserve ten years away from his family, and they are the real victims. These strict laws and system make sentencing dreadfully unjust. Mandatory minimums are practically set in stone, they do not allow the judges to use open judgment, which results in unjust punishment. ...read more.


When compared to sentencing for other crimes, mandatory minimums just seem ridiculous. The length of sentencing for a first time drug offender far succeeds those sentenced for more heinous crimes, like firearms, sexual abuse, assault, manslaughter, burglary and auto theft (Cruel). Under New York law, a person caught selling two ounces of cocaine will receive a 15 year minimum sentence, while a person convicted of rape will only serve a 5 year sentence (Easterbrook 4). Frank Bowman, a law professor at Gonzaga University, states "Long , mandatory sentences for significant drug traffickers are one thing, but rules like five years for possession of five grams of crack cocaine are morally abhorrent" (Easterbrook 4). Our nation truly needs to look over these strict laws and see what it is really doing to our society. Our government needs to look at the thousands of people affected by them. There are so many that have been prosecuted unfairly and do not deserve the harsh punishments that they have received. Those that are imposing these laws should hear the stories of those that they have imprisoned and see them as who they are, people, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, and not just another statistic. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    This act states that the punishment should fit the crime. Before this, there were no statutory aims, or anything which articulated sentencing. In accordance with CJA (1991), it is necessary to have to take into consideration certain facts when sentencing the offender.

  2. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    crime as a result of social factors and influences that stem from their everyday lives. This view would seem to suggest that the criminal justice system and its labelling process has no real effect on the path to crime that an offender may choose to pursue.

  1. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    The theory of general deterrence rests upon the crucial assumption that people are deterred from committing crime by the threat of punishment. It is of some significance that from the evidence on deterrence, the White Paper preceding the Criminal Justice Act 1991 concluded that "it is unrealistic to construct sentencing

  2. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    o All are supervised after release. Home Detention Curfew o Crime and Disorder Act 1998 allows early release if curfew included. o Longer sentence longer curfew. o Each prisoner is assessed as to viability. o If not given HDC then must serve half sentence to be released on licence.

  1. Describe the different aims of sentencing.

    offender stop and consider the possible consequences of his actions, and general deterrence are exemplary sentences which are meant to warn other potential offenders of the possible consequences. Both types have been criticised greatly as individual deterrence is not seen to be very effective as the offender becomes hardened to the punishment as the sentence increases.

  2. The Death Penalty in Canada. There are many issues surrounding the rebirth of ...

    On a large scale, maybe there is not really a wonder why Canada has a much lower amount of crime than the U.S. Some use the argument that the lethal injection death penalty is a humane way of carrying out capital punishment; however other forms of killing such as hanging, shooting, electrocution and gas chambers are still legaliv.

  1. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    Possession of market power; and 2. Willfully acquired or maintained this monopoly power as distinguished from acquisition through a superior product, business acumen, or historical accident. Contrary to popular belief, for monopolization to be illegal under U.S. antitrust law, it is not sufficient for a company to monopolize a market in the sense of possessing a very large market share, even a market share of 100%.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    This will help to prevent situations where sound techniques are applied incorrectly to the actual case. This would also help to avoid any incorrect decisions being made in the courts based upon totally unreliable and incorrect evidence. Another problem with the use of expert witnesses is the ?Prosecutors Fallacy?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work