• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Marbury v. Madison

Extracts from this document...


Leah Armbruster Block 2 3-16-05 Marbury v. Madison 1. Name and Citation of Case. Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. 137 (1803) 2. Facts: What happened? The case of Marbury v. Madison began on March 2, 1801. The Justices in the case were: William Cushing, William Paterson, Samuel Chase, Bushrod Washington, Alfred Moore, John Marshall, William Johnson, Gabriel Duvall, Joseph Story, Smith Thompson, John McLean, Henry Baldwin, and James M. ...read more.


The case of Marbury v. Madison was argued on February 11, 1803, and was decided on February 24, 1803. 3. Procedural of History: What did the original court decide? Who appealed to the appellate court? What was the decision of the appelate court? Who appealed to the Supreme Court? In the case of Marbury v. Madison the case was taken directly to the Supreme Court. William Marbury declared an act of Congress, and took sued for their jobs in the Supreme Court. ...read more.


5. Decision and Analysis. What did the Court decide? How did the vote of the Court breakdown? Explain the justification used by the Court to reach its decision. William Marbury asked the Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus to force James Madison to deliver his commission. The Supreme Court of the United Staes declared that:Marbury is entitled to the commission. The Court, however, cannot issue the writ because the Judiciary Act of 1789, which granted the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court of the United States has the power to judicial review. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. R v David Smith. - ABH, criminal law

    Sentencing: The maximum available penalty for Assault occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (section 47, Offences against the persons Act 1861) is 5 years imprisonment. Obviously it is not a standardised rule that this is given, and it is important to look at cases and relevant authorities in order to ascertain a correct and just punishment for Mr.

  2. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    there are also what Dworkin refers to as "abstract moral principles" (Dworkin Freedom's Law p7) such as the provision in the fourteenth amendment for "equal protection of the law" or "due process" in the fifth amendment. These clauses have to be 'converted' into practice, and this is the remit of the Supreme Court.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work