• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

NEGLIGENCE & DUTY OF CARE - The leading case in Negligence is the case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)

Extracts from this document...


The leading case in Negligence is the case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) This case explains that, Mrs Donoghue and her friend went to a cafe in Paisley. At the cafe, Mrs Donoghues' friend bought her a drink which was a ginger beer float consisting of ginger beer that was in an opaque bottle. After Mrs Donoghue drank out of the drink in a beer cup, her friend topped up the drink, and then they found in the ginger beer bottle a decomposed remains of a snail. Mrs Donoghue claimed that the memories of seeing the snail in the ginger beer she had already drunk made her ill. ...read more.


The question was that "who then in law is my neighbour? The answer was that anyone who is closely and directly affected by your act, to reasonably have them in contemplation as being affected when you are directed to a act. Duty of care This was brought to existence by Lord Bridge in Caparon Industries v Dickman (1990) in this case: The test in this case was that it must be clarified whether the loss was foreseeable i.e. if it could have been prevented as in case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) in the neighbour principle. If the loss was foreseeable, whether there was a sufficient relationship of proximity between the parties should be taken into consideration. ...read more.


* Foreseeability of risk which states that there is no obligation on the defendant for risk other than those within reasonable contemplation. It is unfair to impose liability where risk was unforeseeable as in the case of Roe v minister of health (1954. * Magnitude or degree of risk which states that the care expected depends on the likelihood of the risk as in the case of Bolton v stone (1951). * Experts of professional. * Practicality or prevention (of the risk). Causation In English law, causation is linked to be established between the breach and the resulting damage i.e. on link no liability. In often time, there is no problem when a link is shown because it is fairly obvious that the injury sustained was caused by the negligence. ?? ?? ?? ?? NEGLIGENCE & DUTY OF CARE ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    claim would be made as it brings bad publicity to the club. Often the club will sort matters out away from the public eye and the press in private. Governing bodies such as the Football Association may become involved to enforce their own rules.

  2. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    many leading writers such as Alan Norrie have questioned the nature of this clarity 'I argue that the law of indirect intent may still remain unclear after the recent House of Lords decision in Woollin'[5] HK8 Visit coursework gf in gf fo gf for gf more project gf Do gf


    can sue. Possession includes not only physical occupation, but occupation through servants and agents. Mere use, for example by a lodger or licensee (visitor) is not 'possession' in law. Interference: This must be direct interference, either by entering on land, or remaining on the land after permission to stay has ended.

  2. British Law in Health and Social Care

    pending legal case depends on decisions in previous cases and affects how the law is applied in future cases. Common law evolves with time and the sentencing for various crimes can be made harsher or softer. It uses the idea of precedence so that punishments that have been passed before

  1. Free essay

    Kates case falls under civil litigation in the category of negligence. She was served ...

    but he is liable too for the existence of a faulty product. Product liability can be demanded from any manufacturer or retailer of a product that has caused bodily damage. In most cases strict liability claims have limited the possible defense against a product liability claim since the liability policy

  2. Law- Negligence

    The Hedley Byrne case opened new area for tortuous liability. The House of Lords imposed strict limitations upon the situations that would give rise to liability. First, a special relationship must exist between the parties before there is a possibility of liability for negligent misstatement that causes economic loss.

  1. negligence in tort

    To identify what is considered to be in the patients 'best interest', the Bolam Test comes into practice. The Bolam Test originates from, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957]4. The principle stated in this case is according to which a professional person will not be guilty of negligence if

  2. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    Tesco stores ltd). Because Bright Light PLC and Chemi-Kaze PLC share their promises, their occupiers? liability is also split specifically. Bright Light PLC is liable for the first floor as running business there and likewise Chemi-Kaze PLC is liable for the ground floor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work