• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

NEGLIGENCE & DUTY OF CARE - The leading case in Negligence is the case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)

Extracts from this document...


The leading case in Negligence is the case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) This case explains that, Mrs Donoghue and her friend went to a cafe in Paisley. At the cafe, Mrs Donoghues' friend bought her a drink which was a ginger beer float consisting of ginger beer that was in an opaque bottle. After Mrs Donoghue drank out of the drink in a beer cup, her friend topped up the drink, and then they found in the ginger beer bottle a decomposed remains of a snail. Mrs Donoghue claimed that the memories of seeing the snail in the ginger beer she had already drunk made her ill. ...read more.


The question was that "who then in law is my neighbour? The answer was that anyone who is closely and directly affected by your act, to reasonably have them in contemplation as being affected when you are directed to a act. Duty of care This was brought to existence by Lord Bridge in Caparon Industries v Dickman (1990) in this case: The test in this case was that it must be clarified whether the loss was foreseeable i.e. if it could have been prevented as in case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) in the neighbour principle. If the loss was foreseeable, whether there was a sufficient relationship of proximity between the parties should be taken into consideration. ...read more.


* Foreseeability of risk which states that there is no obligation on the defendant for risk other than those within reasonable contemplation. It is unfair to impose liability where risk was unforeseeable as in the case of Roe v minister of health (1954. * Magnitude or degree of risk which states that the care expected depends on the likelihood of the risk as in the case of Bolton v stone (1951). * Experts of professional. * Practicality or prevention (of the risk). Causation In English law, causation is linked to be established between the breach and the resulting damage i.e. on link no liability. In often time, there is no problem when a link is shown because it is fairly obvious that the injury sustained was caused by the negligence. ?? ?? ?? ?? NEGLIGENCE & DUTY OF CARE ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Law- Negligence

    and the owners of a guest house in Walton v North Cornwall District Council [1997]. Problems have arisen with Hedley Byrne duties of care as statements, whether oral or written, are often passed on and can easily reach an "indeterminate class".

  2. Gross negligence and recklessness.

    But if recklessness involved a more objective, gross negligence test, evidence of drunkenness would be irrelevant. In a majority judgment, Lord Diplock (with Lords Keith and Roskill concurring) considered and rejected the Cunningham approach and the suggestion that the Criminal Damage Act of 1971 was in fact drafted with that very decision in mind.


    can sue. Possession includes not only physical occupation, but occupation through servants and agents. Mere use, for example by a lodger or licensee (visitor) is not 'possession' in law. Interference: This must be direct interference, either by entering on land, or remaining on the land after permission to stay has ended.

  2. Free essay

    Kates case falls under civil litigation in the category of negligence. She was served ...

    but he is liable too for the existence of a faulty product. Product liability can be demanded from any manufacturer or retailer of a product that has caused bodily damage. In most cases strict liability claims have limited the possible defense against a product liability claim since the liability policy

  1. British Law in Health and Social Care

    (Holdsworth, 2006) Common Law Common law forms a major part of England's law. It covers common crimes that happen on a day to day basis and have always existed such as rape, assault, murder and theft. Common law is law created and refined by judges: a decision in a currently

  2. negligence in tort

    Duty means 'proximity' in the legal sense, and proximity means the level of closeness of relationship required for the particular kind of damage. Foresight of damage is required in all cases of negligence and there is a policy element, which is expressed by the view that it must be just

  1. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    Tesco stores ltd). Because Bright Light PLC and Chemi-Kaze PLC share their promises, their occupiers? liability is also split specifically. Bright Light PLC is liable for the first floor as running business there and likewise Chemi-Kaze PLC is liable for the ground floor.

  2. Tort law assignment. Brian fell against the standard of care a reasonable man would ...

    duty of care have been provided by the Court of Appeal in James McNaughten v Hicks Anderson 1991: The purpose for which the statement was made The purpose for which it was communicated The relationship between the person giving the advice, the person receiving the advice and any relevant third

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work