• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Non-fatal Offences?

Extracts from this document...


How satisfactory is the current law on Non-fatal Offences? Non-fatal offences against the person are assault, battery, assault or battery occasioning actually bodily harm (ABH), malicious wounding and Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH) with intent. The first two offences are defined in the Criminal Justice Act 1988, with the remainder being found in the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA). There is a variety of sentences available ranging from imprisonment for six months to a life sentence for the most serious offence of GBH with intent (s.18 OAPA 1861). Moreover it could be argued that the current law on non fatal offences is not satisfactory and it is long over due for reform. Professor Horder of the Law Commission has stated that it is time to 'rethink non fatal offences against the person'. He has also argued that 'the desire for certainty and the fair labeling principle point to the need for greater distinctions between offences'. However to further this Henry LJ describes the current law as 'yet another example of how dreadful and appalling the present state of law is'.It is then no surprise that there are numerous calls for reform in this area. ...read more.


Thus when compared to the common assaults, it seems rather similar, does it not? Furthermore s47 has not yet been really explained as in certain cases such as Chan-fook, Miller etc it just merely states what could amount to ABH but not how it could amount to ABH. This makes the law unclear as the judiciary does not know what they are looking for. Consequently s20 is defined as a more serious offence than s47; nevertheless they carry the same maximum penalty of five years, this is absurd, is it not? Therefore it could be argued that the boundary between assault, battery and ABH and s47 to s20 is too vague and again people may be treated unfairly. It is unjust that a person who causes a small cut can be charged with a more serious offence of s20 instead of s47. Hence the law on non fatal offences is not satisfactory and is seriously over due to be reformed. To further this, the only significant difference between s.20 and s.18 is arguably a slightly more serious mens rea, but this time the sentence leaps from five years to life imprisonment. ...read more.


This would enable more people to understand the current law and maybe might reduce the crime levels, as they might know what there actions could amount to. Under the Bill the structure has been severely revised. For example s.18 is replaced by 'intentionally causing serious injury' which will contain maxima of life, whereas s20 by 'recklessly causing injury' will contain maxima of 5 years. Additionally s47 will be by 'intention and or recklessness and will have a maximum of 2 years. By improving the structure and simplifying would make life a great deal better. This is because the current structure is too complicated. Nevertheless the term assault will still be used but for two separate offences of assault and battery. The aforementioned reforms should make the law clearer and classifying an offence should be less complicated. However one aspect which also should be considered is the idea of codification, joining all the offences and acts together as currently they are all disjointed. A new enactment should be created and established and this would contain everything associated with non fatal offences. It would fundamentally make the law easy, as all the aspects would be in one place. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A reasonably well structured essay which show some of the problems associated with the current non-fatal offences and discusses suggestions for reform. It could be improved by describing the offences and some of the problems more accurately. Rating ***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 18/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    disinterested people would unanimously choose to belong if such a choice were available. His theory was based upon a hypothesis of what a group of individuals placed in what he named "the original position" would agree upon. Rawls argues that traditional self interest would lead an individual to agree to

  2. Woolf Reforms

    The first rule lays down an overriding objective; meaning that the rules should enable courts to deal with cases 'justly'. This objective prevails over all other rules in a case on conflict. Lord Woolf also felt that a change in attitude among the lawyers was vital for any new rules to succeed.

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    This could either show that Anytus despised of Socrates for personal reasons, or it could be taken as proof that his ways of philosophising were truly teaching the young to break up moral values, such as questioning parents in society.

  2. International Institutions and Human Rights. The three international institutions and their impact on ...

    The two are linked; however, in that adherence to the Convention is now effectively a condition of membership of the EU. Additionally, the European Court of Justice refers to the Convention which influences its decisions, even though the EU is not a member of the Convention.

  1. Law and Morality. Within the justice system there is a genuine relationship between law ...

    These recommendations had been later legislated, prostitution was allowed as the 'harm' was only between two consenting individuals, but what the law does not allow soliciting immoral earnings. The age of consent for homosexuals to have sex also dropped to 16 - the same as heterosexuals.

  2. The Bail Act 1976 gives a general right to bail, no matter how serious ...

    the current policy on bail that it usually given unless the defendant poses harm to the public. Also it may be difficult to get lawyers as they are less likely to want to represent someone who they would believe that there is a strong possibility that they are guilty.

  1. Explain the requirements of lawful arrest and detention

    The solicitor from the Criminal Defence Services Direct will give you advice through the telephone. However you can meet them in person if it?s serious crime and have a private talk to them. Silence You as and detain person has the rights to be silence, however if you did do

  2. Describe the use of the Practice Statement using the sources and other cases. [15 ...

    when the House of Lords decision in A V Hoare overruled the decision in Stubbings V Webb. The two cases were based around whether you could make a claim for damages against your rapist when the six year limitation had expired.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work