• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Non-fatal Offences?

Extracts from this document...


How satisfactory is the current law on Non-fatal Offences? Non-fatal offences against the person are assault, battery, assault or battery occasioning actually bodily harm (ABH), malicious wounding and Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH) with intent. The first two offences are defined in the Criminal Justice Act 1988, with the remainder being found in the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA). There is a variety of sentences available ranging from imprisonment for six months to a life sentence for the most serious offence of GBH with intent (s.18 OAPA 1861). Moreover it could be argued that the current law on non fatal offences is not satisfactory and it is long over due for reform. Professor Horder of the Law Commission has stated that it is time to 'rethink non fatal offences against the person'. He has also argued that 'the desire for certainty and the fair labeling principle point to the need for greater distinctions between offences'. However to further this Henry LJ describes the current law as 'yet another example of how dreadful and appalling the present state of law is'.It is then no surprise that there are numerous calls for reform in this area. ...read more.


Thus when compared to the common assaults, it seems rather similar, does it not? Furthermore s47 has not yet been really explained as in certain cases such as Chan-fook, Miller etc it just merely states what could amount to ABH but not how it could amount to ABH. This makes the law unclear as the judiciary does not know what they are looking for. Consequently s20 is defined as a more serious offence than s47; nevertheless they carry the same maximum penalty of five years, this is absurd, is it not? Therefore it could be argued that the boundary between assault, battery and ABH and s47 to s20 is too vague and again people may be treated unfairly. It is unjust that a person who causes a small cut can be charged with a more serious offence of s20 instead of s47. Hence the law on non fatal offences is not satisfactory and is seriously over due to be reformed. To further this, the only significant difference between s.20 and s.18 is arguably a slightly more serious mens rea, but this time the sentence leaps from five years to life imprisonment. ...read more.


This would enable more people to understand the current law and maybe might reduce the crime levels, as they might know what there actions could amount to. Under the Bill the structure has been severely revised. For example s.18 is replaced by 'intentionally causing serious injury' which will contain maxima of life, whereas s20 by 'recklessly causing injury' will contain maxima of 5 years. Additionally s47 will be by 'intention and or recklessness and will have a maximum of 2 years. By improving the structure and simplifying would make life a great deal better. This is because the current structure is too complicated. Nevertheless the term assault will still be used but for two separate offences of assault and battery. The aforementioned reforms should make the law clearer and classifying an offence should be less complicated. However one aspect which also should be considered is the idea of codification, joining all the offences and acts together as currently they are all disjointed. A new enactment should be created and established and this would contain everything associated with non fatal offences. It would fundamentally make the law easy, as all the aspects would be in one place. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A reasonably well structured essay which show some of the problems associated with the current non-fatal offences and discusses suggestions for reform. It could be improved by describing the offences and some of the problems more accurately. Rating ***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 18/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. International Institutions and Human Rights. The three international institutions and their impact on ...

    The Human Rights Act 1998 gives further legal effect in the UK to the fundamental rights and freedoms contained in the European Convention on Human Rights. These rights not only impact matters of life and death, they also affect the rights you have in your everyday life: what you

  2. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    deterrence for the simple fact that they do not care enough about what the consequences are if and when they get caught. Jeremy Bentham discusses general deterrence and believes that sentencing should be fairer and that it should aim to achieve general deterrence, but there are some crimes which general deterrence does not apply to.

  1. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    Utilitarianism is the theory that society should work towards the greatest happiness for the greatest number, regardless of whether some individuals lose out or not. A Utilitarian would assess whether a law was just or not by finding the consequences of the law, and deciding if said law maximised happiness, well-being, or any other desirable effect for the majority.

  2. Law and Morality. Within the justice system there is a genuine relationship between law ...

    Lord Devlin disapproved of their recommendations proposed by the Wolfenden Committee. He argued that there should be a 'common morality' (determined by what a right minded person to consider immoral) that society should follow and that society must punish an act that weakens this shared morality.

  1. Explain the requirements of lawful arrest and detention

    The solicitor from the Criminal Defence Services Direct will give you advice through the telephone. However you can meet them in person if it?s serious crime and have a private talk to them. Silence You as and detain person has the rights to be silence, however if you did do

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    For them, they thought they have their men. The trial rested on two pieces or evidence, the forensic test, and a confession which one of the men had made to the police. But although there were many people who said they could have identified the suspects, they did not do so.

  1. Describe the use of the Practice Statement using the sources and other cases. [15 ...

    that times had changed and people do eventually speak out about rape and they needed to accommodate for this. Havana Railways 1968 had ruled that if you apply for compensation in a British court, you can only claim that compensation in the British currency.

  2. Tribunals are specialist judicial bodies which deals with disputes concerning particular areas of law.

    There are routes leading up to High Court or Court of Appeal. Final appeals go to Supreme court. Appeals can only be made when the decision is perverse. No appeal can be made against decision by Mental Health review Tribunals, decision are binding.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work