• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Notes on the law on murder

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Murder There are three types of unlawful homicide: murder, voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. The degree of seriousness applied to each offence is essentially a reflection of the defendant?s state of mind. With regard to the killing ? murder is the most serious category of unlawful homicide. Definition: ?Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being under Queen?s peace with malice aforethought?. Actus Reus of Murder (Pagett, Jordan, Smith and Blaue) The actus reus of murder simply consists of the unlawful killing of a human being under Queen?s peace. It can be broken down into three main elements: The unlawful killing ? the killing must be unlawful. ...read more.

Middle

The prosecution must prove that defendant?s act was both legal and factual cause of death. Factual ? use the ?But for? test. But for the defendants conduct, would the consequences have occurred? R v Pagett ? Pagett?s girlfriend was killed by police bullets while Pagett was using her as a shield. Legal ? the defendants act must be an operative and substantial cause of death. R v Smith ? two soldiers had a fight which resulted in the victim receiving a bayonet wound. Doctor failed to diagnose punctured lung and gave bad treatment. (The chain of causation wasn?t broken ? at the time of death, the original wound was still operating and substantial cause.) ...read more.

Conclusion

(Victims refusal to accept transfusion did not break the chain of causation) Mens Rea of Murder ( Vickers, Cunningham) Mens rea of murder is simply stated as intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm (GBH) with malice aforethought, which is an element of planning. There are two definite cases for mens rea of murder ? stated below. In Vickers, the defendant broke into a sweet shop and beat the elderly owner down. He was convicted of murder as the element of planning was there. R v Cunningham - the defendant had repeatedly struck his victim with a chair leg and the victim died. The House of Lords stated that it amounts to murder because the intention to cause ?very serious injury (GBH) was there. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Murder - Notes and Evaluation.

    4 star(s)

    It is not certain whether a person who is 'brain dead' would be considered as a reasonable creature in being or not - it is suggested that 'brain death' is the recognised test for death, but there has been no case on this point.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    This leads me in to my next point which is connected to the first. What is intention, and how do you prove the difference between the intention to kill and the intention to do GBH? The courts find it difficult trying to find out what is meant by intention, for

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Voluntary Manslaghter - Notes and Evaluation.

    3 star(s)

    could modify the reasonable man test further than being an adult who was physically and mentally normal, as in Bedder v DPP (1954), but only if the characteristic of the defendant is relevant to the provocation. These included age, sex, race, colour, ethnic origin, physical deformity, impotence, their history or their circumstances at the time.

  2. Non-Fatal Offences - Notes and Evaluation.

    Intention cannot be found unless the harm caused was a virtual certainty as a result of the defendant actions and the defendant realised that this was so (Woollin 1998). When the defendant is trying to resist or prevent arrest or detention, then the level of intention regarding the injury is lower.

  1. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    The judges will also weigh up the cost of precautions and will not expect excessive costs to be taken although this will be according to the circumstances, thus in Latimer v AEC it was held that putting sawdust on the factory floor was an adequate precaution as otherwise the factory would have to close down.

  2. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    In T, it could have been decided by the judges that post-traumatic stress was a disease of the mind, and so the appropriate defence is insanity. Because of the decision in Quick, she was able to rely on the defence of automatism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work