• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Notes on the law on murder

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Murder There are three types of unlawful homicide: murder, voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. The degree of seriousness applied to each offence is essentially a reflection of the defendant?s state of mind. With regard to the killing ? murder is the most serious category of unlawful homicide. Definition: ?Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being under Queen?s peace with malice aforethought?. Actus Reus of Murder (Pagett, Jordan, Smith and Blaue) The actus reus of murder simply consists of the unlawful killing of a human being under Queen?s peace. It can be broken down into three main elements: The unlawful killing ? the killing must be unlawful. ...read more.

Middle

The prosecution must prove that defendant?s act was both legal and factual cause of death. Factual ? use the ?But for? test. But for the defendants conduct, would the consequences have occurred? R v Pagett ? Pagett?s girlfriend was killed by police bullets while Pagett was using her as a shield. Legal ? the defendants act must be an operative and substantial cause of death. R v Smith ? two soldiers had a fight which resulted in the victim receiving a bayonet wound. Doctor failed to diagnose punctured lung and gave bad treatment. (The chain of causation wasn?t broken ? at the time of death, the original wound was still operating and substantial cause.) ...read more.

Conclusion

(Victims refusal to accept transfusion did not break the chain of causation) Mens Rea of Murder ( Vickers, Cunningham) Mens rea of murder is simply stated as intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm (GBH) with malice aforethought, which is an element of planning. There are two definite cases for mens rea of murder ? stated below. In Vickers, the defendant broke into a sweet shop and beat the elderly owner down. He was convicted of murder as the element of planning was there. R v Cunningham - the defendant had repeatedly struck his victim with a chair leg and the victim died. The House of Lords stated that it amounts to murder because the intention to cause ?very serious injury (GBH) was there. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Murder - Notes and Evaluation.

    4 star(s)

    Cato (1976). The defendant must also take the victim as he finds him. This is known as the thin skull rule, and means that if the victim has something about him which makes an injury more serious, the defendant is liable for the more serious injury, e.g. Blaue (1975). 4.)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Voluntary Manslaghter - Notes and Evaluation.

    3 star(s)

    immediate, but was successful on the grounds of Diminished Responsibility as "slow burn anger" is a recognized symptom of battered women's syndrome. The Court of Appeal has made it clear that a defence of provocation can succeed if there is a series of events over time which drove the woman to murder (Humphreys 1995).

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    So this brings me back to my earlier point - if parliament wont spend the time to change the law on murder to something which is a more reasonable sentence, then why cant it be change in cases, like it always has been?

  2. Non-Fatal Offences - Notes and Evaluation.

    Critical Evaluation Of Non-Fatal Offences Recommendations for the reform of this area of the law have been made by both the Criminal Law Revision Committee and the Law Commission. The Law Commission pointed out that there are three main problems with the OAPA 1861.

  1. Looking at the offences of Assault, Battery, Actual bodily harm and Grievous really serious ...

    and grievous bodily harm, which is that GBH, is the more serious injury. For a defendant to be guilty of wounding the victim, the wound would have broken both layers of the skin, the dermis and epidermis. After both layers have been broken bleeding must result from the injury.

  2. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    The cause was the natural condition, sleep?. In Burgess, the defendant and his girlfriend were watching video?s in his flat. They fell asleep, and in his sleep Burgess attacked his girlfriend with a video recorder and a wine bottle, and then grasped her by the throat.

  1. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    is transferred to the actual victim. This was illustrated in R v Latimer where A went to hit B with a belt which recoiled and hit C instead. Latimer?s intent to harm was transferred to C. The actus reus and the mens rea must still coincide so where A plans

  2. The History and Main Features of Criminal Law in the USA.

    The most serious type of homicide is a murder. Penalties are more severe when the killing was intentional rather than a result recklessness or negligence.[10] Historically, the term public morals originated in medieval days when the monarchs and the churches were jostling for jurisdiction over nonviolent sexual conduct; the churches, which considered themselves the guardians of public morals, labeled

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work