• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Occupiers liability - Both Mike and Nigel will have a claim in the tort of occupiers liability. Occupiers liability concerns the liability of an occupier to the claimants injury, loss or damage to property

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Occupiers liability act question 4)b) Both Mike and Nigel will have a claim in the tort of occupiers liability. Occupiers liability concerns the liability of an occupier to the claimants injury, loss or damage to property suffered whilst on the occupiers premises. It is a land based tort, so need to prove that the defendant Ken is the occupier. An occupier is some one who has a sunstaintial degree of control over the premises. As regards Ken, we are told that he owns the gardens in which the swimming pool is situatied, meaning that he has control over the premises where both the accidents occurred, so he is the occupier. ...read more.

Middle

The duty is owed in premises which are either a fixed or movable structure s1(2). As the incident occurs in a swimming pool in Kens garden, this can be said to be premises. The circumstances in which the duty is owed to a trespasser are when the occupier Is aware or has reasonable grounds to believe a danger exists. Is aware or has reasonable grounds to believe that the trespasser is in the vicinity or they may come in to the vicinity of the danger The risk is one against which, in all circumstances of the case, the occupier may reasonably be expected to offer some protection. ...read more.

Conclusion

So the fact that Mike also climbs in the garden and the swimming pool as night shows that he ought reasonably to believe that he will be there, as others previously to him have done the same. Finally, Ken has offered some sort of protection against the risk by placing a cover over it when it wasn't in use. However, this part of the test is both subjective and objective, and the focus is on all the circumstances of the case. As Ken put the cover over the swimming pool to prevent people from swimming in the pool, the fact that Mike was injured shows ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    However it is more realistic that the passer by will claim as he would not have consented to the injuries. The sports player consents to many things that occur on the field and even if something goes beyond what can reasonably be consented to it is quite unlikely that a

  2. Consider the meaning and importance of fault-based liability in English law

    The judge can give an absolute discharge if they chose to do so, if we take in to account proportionality, this is still recognised in the sentence however the defendant would still be labelled as a murderer. In cases involving negligence, the neighbour principal, established in Donoghue v Stevenson is

  1. Examine the arguments for and against strict liability illustrating your answer with example of ...

    conviction of defendant being in possessions of drugs whereas in Sweet v Parsley1970 the defendant conviction was as she did not have the mens rea of the crime. A negative cause for strict liability is that the courts may also have a clack of clarity in some judgments in Warner

  2. negligence in tort

    The treatment must be in the patients 'best interests'. The best interests test remains the most appropriate standard for providing treatment for patients who are incompetent and have left no ascertainable views as to how they wish to be treated.

  1. UNIT3 ASSIGNMENT4 LAW OF TORT

    The test is objective (i.e. what a reasonable person would consider a nuisance rather than what the claimant himself considered a nuisance), and the court takes many factors into consideration, including the purpose or motive of the defendant (Ken) and the following: The court will consider whether it was practicable

  2. Discuss the meaning of fault on the basis for criminal liability. Explain and evaluate ...

    In crimes of Absolute liability the actus reus of the crime is not needed for the defendant to be guilty, and in crimes of Strict liability, the mens rea of the crime is not needed to prove that the defendant was to blame.

  1. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    Baroness Wootton agrees on this point (along with may other points made by Lord Diplock) by saying "If the law says that certain things are not to be done, it is illogical to confine this prohibition to occasions on which they are done from malice aforethought: for at least the

  2. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    The court system in England and Wales The lowest criminal courts or Magistrates' Courts deal with minor offences with more serious cases being heard in the Crown Court, in front of a judge and jury. The Crown Court also hears cases appealed from the Magistrates' Courts on factual points.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work