• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offences Against the Person Act 1861

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A was engaged in rifle practice on a local firing range. A knew that B was 400 yards away in a trench below the target keeping score. A discharged six rounds at the target and B emerged from the protection of the trench. A decided to frighten him and fired a round over B's head. The round hit a concrete post and ricocheted and hit B who was seriously injured. Advise A of his criminal liability. As soon as he fired the round over B's head, A might have committed either a battery or an assault contrary to s 39 of the Criminal Justice Act. An assault and a battery is respectively intentionally or recklessly causing one to apprehend immediate personal violence and intentionally or recklessly applying personal violence. For battery, since the bullet hit B, there is obviously an application of force. Though A had not intended that, he commits the offence as long as he was reckless as to whether the bullet would hit B. ...read more.

Middle

In any case, it is a question of fact for the jury to decide. For B's serious injury, A could be liable for an offence contrary to s18 of the OAPA 1861, which is malicious wounding or causing of grievous bodily harm with intent. Since B sustained serious injury, the element of 'grievous bodily harm' which merely denotes 'serious bodily harm' (R v Saunders), is readily satisfied. The situation is similar for 'causing': though the round hit B indirectly because it ricocheted, A had still caused the injury by virtue of the event being a natural consequence of the firing of the round (R v Hallet). But A might have a defence on the issue of mens rea. s18 requires proof of an intent to cause grievous bodily harm, and recklessness does not suffice (Belfon). Hence A has to be proven to have been 'virtually certain' that B would sustain GBH or be wounded (Nedrick). ...read more.

Conclusion

Alternatively then, A could be charged with s 47 OAPA assault occasioning actual bodily harm. It was said in R v Roberts, as long as an assault and actual bodily harm is established and that causation is proven between the two, no further mens rea is required. The element of ABH would easily be met, since the injury falls within the definition of 'any interference with comfort' (Chan - Fook). Hence success of a conviction on s47 will depend on whether (as discussed above) there is evidence on A's foresight of application of force, and evidence of B's apprehension of immediate violence and the jury's evaluation. If R v Ireland is extended, A would be guilty of a s18 offence. If the jury is satisfied that B apprehended another episode of immediate violence right after he got hit, A would be guilty of a s47 offence as well. Otherwise, A would most probably be absolved from liability. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Murder - Notes and Evaluation.

    4 star(s)

    In Cunningham (1981), Lord Davies stated that the thought that the Mens Rea for murder should be limited to an intention to kill. However, it could also be argued that the definition of murder is too narrow, as the English definition of murder excludes recklessness as to death (e.g.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Is the current law on the non-fatal offences against the person satisfactory?

    4 star(s)

    the ordinary conduct of daily life", thus incorporating a point of law from the common law into a statute. The offence of ABH has been clarified through case law, although there are still important issues that remain unresolved.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Voluntary Manslaghter - Notes and Evaluation.

    3 star(s)

    Diminished Responsibility covers a wide range of mental conditions, including depressive illnesses, paranoia, epilepsy, severe trauma, PMT and battered women's syndrome. The courts will not recognize abnormality of the mind if it is simply jealousy.

  2. Property Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Police Powers of Search and Entry.

    For instance, the Gaming Act 1968 they have the power to enter licensed premises to carry out examinations. The other powers consist of searches for drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, and for the firearms under the Act of Firearms 1968.

  1. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    established the concept of a duty of care. Her friend bought her a ginger beer, it had a snail in it and she became ill. She couldn't sue the shop because no contract but sued the manufacture. Went to the House of Lords where they decided manufacture owed a duty of care.

  2. Non-Fatal Offences - Notes and Evaluation.

    Force may also be lawful when used in self defence or prevention of crime, but only if the force used was reasonable in the circumstances. Force may also be legal in the correction of a child by a parent, as long as it is moderate and reasonable.

  1. There are two ways of committing common assault which are assault and battery. Both ...

    In this case court found that the victim's state of mind was not only terror but terror of some immediate violence. Therefore statement shows that it is the immediacy of violence which must be proven and not the immediacy of fear.

  2. How Satisfactory Is The Current Law On The Deception Offences?

    It was true he obtained the cards by a deception, but he was not charged with obtaining the cards, only the obtaining of the goods by using the cards. The card companies were entitles to revoke his right to use the cards but until they did so he had authority

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work