• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offers last forever unless expressly revoked. Critically evaluate this statement as it relates to the formation of contracts.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Offers last forever unless expressly revoked.? Critically evaluate this statement as it relates to the formation of contracts. Basically, contract cannot come into existence until there has been a valid offer and corresponding acceptance. In other words, If an offer is withdrawn prior to acceptance, then no contract can result. Offer means an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention that it shall become binding on the offeror as soon as it is accepted by the offeree. The offer may be communicated in writing, orally, by conduct or combination of all three. If an offer is withdrawn prior to acceptance, then no contract can result. It may be contested that even if an offer has been communicated to the intended offeree, the offer will never last forever. There are several situations where an offer can be terminated and these can range from revocation of offer, lapse of time, failure of a precondition, rejection, counter-offer, death of the offeror. ...read more.

Middle

However, communication need not be made by the offeror himself, it could be made through a reliable third party as shown in the case, Dickinson v Dodds where the plaintiff was told by a neighbor that a farm which had been offered to him had been sold to a third party. The court held that the offer had been validly revoked. An offer may be terminated when reasonable time has lapsed as was in the case, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore where defendant offered to buy shares in the company. He heard nothing from the company, after five months, he was then informed the shares had been allotted to him. Defendant refused to take up the shares. The court held that offer had lapsed as five months were not a reasonable length of time for acceptance of an offer to buy shares with a rapidly fluctuating price. ...read more.

Conclusion

An offer lapses when the offeree rejects it and the offeree cannot subsequently accept the original offer. In this case, the defendant offered to sell his farm at £1000, and the claimant responded by offering to buy it at £950. It was held that this was a counter-offer which terminated the original offer which was therefore no longer open for acceptance. Lastly, it appears that the offer will lapse if the offeree knows that the offeror has died. If the offeree is unaware of the offeror’s death, it probably will not as stated in Bradbury v Morgan. If an offer requires personal performance by the offeror such as painting a picture, it will usually lapse on the offeror death. In conclusion, based on the cases expressed, we can clearly see that an offer does not last forever, as an offer can be rescinded by either parties for the reasons outlined above. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    Sir Frederick Pollock defines it in a similar way as well, in the case of Dunlop v Selfridge[1915] as being an act or forbearance of one part, or the promise thereof, is the price for which the price of the other is bought and the promise thus given is for value is enforceable.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    It was not afterwards competent for the plaintiff to revive the proposal of the defendant, by tendering an acceptance of it; and that, therefore, there existed no obligation of any sort between the parties. * And it is different from asking mere information.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157. The plaintiff sought an injunction to restrain a pop group from engaging anyone else as their management. The injunction was refused by the High Court. "It was said in this case that if an injunction is granted the Troggs could, without

  2. Void and voidable Contracts.

    Karen has clearly asked the manager, who is an informed person, for the dimensions of the sofa. He has innocently misinformed her, thus inducing her to enter the contract. Therefore the contract is voidable and gives Karen the right to withdraw from the contract if she so wishes.

  1. Explain what is meant by an unfair term in a contract and describe and ...

    to be unfamiliar with the countless terms found in the small print, which are the subject of regulation. In the case of Director- General of Fair Trading v First National Bank PLC (2002)8 , Lord Goodhart QC, on behalf of the bank, submitted that no assessment might be made of

  2. Contract Practice for Alpha construction LTD.

    Production Information TSN believed that production information should include all information required from inception to completion, so for instance during inception stage the client?s brief is considered to be part of production information, during the strategic briefing the site maps and reports are classified as production information.

  1. DIFFEERENT AREAS OF CONTRACT LAW

    and on the 1st December sent a letter to Thomson which contained a withdrawal of his earlier offer. James withdrawal letter and Thomson's letter of acceptance had crossed in the post. Both letters arrived on the 2nd of December. So did James have a contract with Thomson?

  2. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    The objective test could result in unfairness as in Felthouse v Bindley (1863); the offeror and the offeree both wished for there to be a contract and there was independence evidence to confirm this. The offeree had contacted the auctioneer holding the horse to remove the horse to remove the horse from the auction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work