• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offers last forever unless expressly revoked. Critically evaluate this statement as it relates to the formation of contracts.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Offers last forever unless expressly revoked.? Critically evaluate this statement as it relates to the formation of contracts. Basically, contract cannot come into existence until there has been a valid offer and corresponding acceptance. In other words, If an offer is withdrawn prior to acceptance, then no contract can result. Offer means an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention that it shall become binding on the offeror as soon as it is accepted by the offeree. The offer may be communicated in writing, orally, by conduct or combination of all three. If an offer is withdrawn prior to acceptance, then no contract can result. It may be contested that even if an offer has been communicated to the intended offeree, the offer will never last forever. There are several situations where an offer can be terminated and these can range from revocation of offer, lapse of time, failure of a precondition, rejection, counter-offer, death of the offeror. ...read more.

Middle

However, communication need not be made by the offeror himself, it could be made through a reliable third party as shown in the case, Dickinson v Dodds where the plaintiff was told by a neighbor that a farm which had been offered to him had been sold to a third party. The court held that the offer had been validly revoked. An offer may be terminated when reasonable time has lapsed as was in the case, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore where defendant offered to buy shares in the company. He heard nothing from the company, after five months, he was then informed the shares had been allotted to him. Defendant refused to take up the shares. The court held that offer had lapsed as five months were not a reasonable length of time for acceptance of an offer to buy shares with a rapidly fluctuating price. ...read more.

Conclusion

An offer lapses when the offeree rejects it and the offeree cannot subsequently accept the original offer. In this case, the defendant offered to sell his farm at £1000, and the claimant responded by offering to buy it at £950. It was held that this was a counter-offer which terminated the original offer which was therefore no longer open for acceptance. Lastly, it appears that the offer will lapse if the offeree knows that the offeror has died. If the offeree is unaware of the offeror’s death, it probably will not as stated in Bradbury v Morgan. If an offer requires personal performance by the offeror such as painting a picture, it will usually lapse on the offeror death. In conclusion, based on the cases expressed, we can clearly see that an offer does not last forever, as an offer can be rescinded by either parties for the reasons outlined above. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    Sir Frederick Pollock defines it in a similar way as well, in the case of Dunlop v Selfridge[1915] as being an act or forbearance of one part, or the promise thereof, is the price for which the price of the other is bought and the promise thus given is for value is enforceable.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    Routledge v Grant The defendant offered to sell his house but stated the acceptance must be made within six weeks....but before the acceptance is made. The offeror then withdraw his offer. The court held that there is no binding contract formed.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    It included an exclusion clause in the small print. What if the person signs the contract because of fraud or misrepresentation? Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dying Co [1951] 1 KB 805. The claimant took a wedding dress trimmed with beads and sequins to be cleaned.

  2. Void and voidable Contracts.

    leading him to believe that he could make higher profits than he possibly could. Dan can sue for negligent misrepresentation and can claim damages for financial loss. In the case of Esso Petroleum v Mardon [1976], Esso's experienced representative told Mardon that Esso estimated that the throughput of petrol on a certain site would reach 200,000 gallons.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The commission was payable on hire. (Taken from Common Law 1 BPP) Liverpool Corporation V Irwin 1976 "The condition of a council tower block deteriorated: there were defects in the stairs and lifts and internal rubbish chutes became blocked. The Irwins alleged a breach on the part of the council of its implied covenant for their quiet enjoyment of the property."

  2. Contract Practice for Alpha construction LTD.

    which are required but is not part of the building itself i.e. preambles. Identified that specification and bills of quantities can be categorised under ?Written documentation? which purpose is to accompany the drawings and provide information which cannot be expressed in the form of illustrations.

  1. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    Some of these defects may be easily remedied - others clearly cannot be. Thus some potential breaches may be described as minor whereas others would be fundamental. This is the type of term that it is not sensible to classify either as a warranty or as a condition.

  2. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    The objective test could result in unfairness as in Felthouse v Bindley (1863); the offeror and the offeree both wished for there to be a contract and there was independence evidence to confirm this. The offeree had contacted the auctioneer holding the horse to remove the horse to remove the horse from the auction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work