• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offers last forever unless expressly revoked. Critically evaluate this statement as it relates to the formation of contracts.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Offers last forever unless expressly revoked.? Critically evaluate this statement as it relates to the formation of contracts. Basically, contract cannot come into existence until there has been a valid offer and corresponding acceptance. In other words, If an offer is withdrawn prior to acceptance, then no contract can result. Offer means an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention that it shall become binding on the offeror as soon as it is accepted by the offeree. The offer may be communicated in writing, orally, by conduct or combination of all three. If an offer is withdrawn prior to acceptance, then no contract can result. It may be contested that even if an offer has been communicated to the intended offeree, the offer will never last forever. There are several situations where an offer can be terminated and these can range from revocation of offer, lapse of time, failure of a precondition, rejection, counter-offer, death of the offeror. ...read more.

Middle

However, communication need not be made by the offeror himself, it could be made through a reliable third party as shown in the case, Dickinson v Dodds where the plaintiff was told by a neighbor that a farm which had been offered to him had been sold to a third party. The court held that the offer had been validly revoked. An offer may be terminated when reasonable time has lapsed as was in the case, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore where defendant offered to buy shares in the company. He heard nothing from the company, after five months, he was then informed the shares had been allotted to him. Defendant refused to take up the shares. The court held that offer had lapsed as five months were not a reasonable length of time for acceptance of an offer to buy shares with a rapidly fluctuating price. ...read more.

Conclusion

An offer lapses when the offeree rejects it and the offeree cannot subsequently accept the original offer. In this case, the defendant offered to sell his farm at £1000, and the claimant responded by offering to buy it at £950. It was held that this was a counter-offer which terminated the original offer which was therefore no longer open for acceptance. Lastly, it appears that the offer will lapse if the offeree knows that the offeror has died. If the offeree is unaware of the offeror’s death, it probably will not as stated in Bradbury v Morgan. If an offer requires personal performance by the offeror such as painting a picture, it will usually lapse on the offeror death. In conclusion, based on the cases expressed, we can clearly see that an offer does not last forever, as an offer can be rescinded by either parties for the reasons outlined above. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    v Kenyon and Roscorla v Thomas, where promises were made after the initial contract had been formed and performed similarly, a promise to increase wages retrospectively was held to be supported by a consideration in the past and again, this lacks reciprocity and so, such a contract will be unenforceable

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    * And it is different from asking mere information. It depends on the intention, objectively ascertained Stevenson v McLean (1880) On Saturday, the defendant offered to sell iron to the plaintiff at 40 shillings a ton, open until Monday. On Monday at 10am, the plaintiff sent a telegram asking if he could have credit terms.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    (per Wright J.) Specific performance is not granted for contracts for personal services and contracts which require constant supervision. Injunctions. An injunction is an order, normally against the defendant, not to do a particular thing. An injunction cannot be used to get round the unavailability of specific performance where personal services are involved.

  2. Void and voidable Contracts.

    As this is an innocent misrepresentation, Karen can rescind the contact but not claim damages as such, they can only be awarded by the court at its discretion. Again, as with the previous case of Smith v Hughes, '...unless there be a warranty making it part of the bargain that it possesses some particular quality...'

  1. Explain what is meant by an unfair term in a contract and describe and ...

    to be unfamiliar with the countless terms found in the small print, which are the subject of regulation. In the case of Director- General of Fair Trading v First National Bank PLC (2002)8 , Lord Goodhart QC, on behalf of the bank, submitted that no assessment might be made of

  2. DIFFEERENT AREAS OF CONTRACT LAW

    Wrench's offer of �950 constituted a counter offer which cancelled out Hyde's original offer. Accordingly Hyde's original offer was no longer open for acceptance. Nowadays though you have emails and all forms are printed with the companies own terms and conditions and terms which may cover issues in law which will govern the contract e.g.

  1. "There are occasions where terms are implied into contracts which have never been discussed ...

    Terms can also be implied by the courts in order to give meaning and sense to an agreement. Some contracts would be meaningless and inoperable without the inclusion of some terms that give sense to the agreement as in the case of Schawel v Reade.

  2. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    The courts claim the law on formation of contracts will consider what the parties intended which is a subjective approach. However, what the courts actually consider is what the ?reasonable? person would think of the facts which is an objective test.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work