• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offers last forever unless expressly revoked. Critically evaluate this statement as it relates to the formation of contracts.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Offers last forever unless expressly revoked.? Critically evaluate this statement as it relates to the formation of contracts. Basically, contract cannot come into existence until there has been a valid offer and corresponding acceptance. In other words, If an offer is withdrawn prior to acceptance, then no contract can result. Offer means an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention that it shall become binding on the offeror as soon as it is accepted by the offeree. The offer may be communicated in writing, orally, by conduct or combination of all three. If an offer is withdrawn prior to acceptance, then no contract can result. It may be contested that even if an offer has been communicated to the intended offeree, the offer will never last forever. There are several situations where an offer can be terminated and these can range from revocation of offer, lapse of time, failure of a precondition, rejection, counter-offer, death of the offeror. ...read more.

Middle

However, communication need not be made by the offeror himself, it could be made through a reliable third party as shown in the case, Dickinson v Dodds where the plaintiff was told by a neighbor that a farm which had been offered to him had been sold to a third party. The court held that the offer had been validly revoked. An offer may be terminated when reasonable time has lapsed as was in the case, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore where defendant offered to buy shares in the company. He heard nothing from the company, after five months, he was then informed the shares had been allotted to him. Defendant refused to take up the shares. The court held that offer had lapsed as five months were not a reasonable length of time for acceptance of an offer to buy shares with a rapidly fluctuating price. ...read more.

Conclusion

An offer lapses when the offeree rejects it and the offeree cannot subsequently accept the original offer. In this case, the defendant offered to sell his farm at £1000, and the claimant responded by offering to buy it at £950. It was held that this was a counter-offer which terminated the original offer which was therefore no longer open for acceptance. Lastly, it appears that the offer will lapse if the offeree knows that the offeror has died. If the offeree is unaware of the offeror’s death, it probably will not as stated in Bradbury v Morgan. If an offer requires personal performance by the offeror such as painting a picture, it will usually lapse on the offeror death. In conclusion, based on the cases expressed, we can clearly see that an offer does not last forever, as an offer can be rescinded by either parties for the reasons outlined above. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    Sir Frederick Pollock defines it in a similar way as well, in the case of Dunlop v Selfridge[1915] as being an act or forbearance of one part, or the promise thereof, is the price for which the price of the other is bought and the promise thus given is for value is enforceable.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    On Thursday, Dodds sold the house to Allan. Dickinson was told of the sale by Berry, the estate agent, and he delivered an acceptance before 9am Friday. The trial judge awarded Dickinson a decree of specific performance. The Court of Appeal reversed the decision of the judge.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    When given a document to sign, she asked what it was and was told that it exempted the company from liability for damage to the beads and sequins. She signed. The dress was returned stained. The exclusion clause actually covered "any damage howsoever caused".

  2. Void and voidable Contracts.

    Karen has clearly asked the manager, who is an informed person, for the dimensions of the sofa. He has innocently misinformed her, thus inducing her to enter the contract. Therefore the contract is voidable and gives Karen the right to withdraw from the contract if she so wishes.

  1. Explain what is meant by an unfair term in a contract and describe and ...

    to be unfamiliar with the countless terms found in the small print, which are the subject of regulation. In the case of Director- General of Fair Trading v First National Bank PLC (2002)8 , Lord Goodhart QC, on behalf of the bank, submitted that no assessment might be made of

  2. Contract Practice for Alpha construction LTD.

    CB 3.0 Production Information To discuss the nature of the production information. CB 4.0 Any other business CB 5.0 Date of next meeting To agree date of next meeting. CB Minutes 1.4 Project: Hertfordshire School of Construction Ltd Date: 14 March 2004 Time: 12:30 Location: Marylebone Campus, Library Present : Taha Sheikh-Noor (TSN), Courtney Bramwell (CB), Shazad Mahmood (SM)

  1. DIFFEERENT AREAS OF CONTRACT LAW

    This case is under the postal rule; this is a special rule where offers and acceptance are sent using the post office. It was first used in an English Case Adams v Lindsell (1818) - as was introduced as a matter of convenience.

  2. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    It is visible that the rules of offer and acceptance can be interpreted as being unfair and the postal rule can become problematic. An offer may be stated to be open for acceptance for a set period, the offeree may rely on that statement and yet the offeror may withdraw the offer within the stated period- Routledge v Grant (1828).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work